Cargando…

122. The Buck Stops Here. PICC Line Utilization: Stewardship Is Not Only About Antimicrobials Any More

BACKGROUND: The Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend avoiding placement of PICCs in patients with GFRs less than 45. A recent study found that 1 in 4 PICCs are placed in patients with CKD and the majority of PICCs are for antibiotics. Recent studies have demonstrated early and safe transition from I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridder, Mark, Cawcutt, Kelly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777479/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.167
_version_ 1783630911264260096
author Ridder, Mark
Cawcutt, Kelly
author_facet Ridder, Mark
Cawcutt, Kelly
author_sort Ridder, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend avoiding placement of PICCs in patients with GFRs less than 45. A recent study found that 1 in 4 PICCs are placed in patients with CKD and the majority of PICCs are for antibiotics. Recent studies have demonstrated early and safe transition from IV to PO antibiotics forgoing PICC use. To our knowledge no studies assess opportunities to reduce PICC use and adverse events through infectious disease. This study aims to identify opportunities for improved PICC utilization. METHODS: This was a single center retrospective analysis of all PICCs in adults from January 2017 to October 2019 at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC). Data was abstracted via chart review including demographics, index hospital stay, PICC details, PICC indication(s), PICC duration, GFR prior to PICC placement. If present, antimicrobial indication, and infection information. RESULTS: 211 patients were included. PICC lines were placed in 18.0% (n=38) of patients with GFR < 45. 123 PICCs were for antibiotics. Breakdown of IV antibiotic duration in Figure 1. Infection types treated in < 7 days noted in Figure 2. Infection types treated in 7 – 13 days noted in Figure 2. There was a statistically significant finding of increased duration of antibiotics when infectious disease was consulted with 90.0% (n=63) of cases 14 + days, 60.9% (n = 14) for 7 – 13 days, and 56.7% (n=17) in cases < 7 days (p=0.002). Figure 1 [Image: see text] Figure 2 [Image: see text] Figure 3 [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Infectious disease providers are trained to consider antimicrobial stewardship. Antimicrobials directly impact therapeutic choices for patients. However, less frequently considered is the insertion of PICCs in patients with tenuous renal function. Given the prevalence of PICCs in patients with GFR < 45, contrary to guideline recommendations, as well as increasing evidence for use of shorter durations and oral antibiotics for treatment there is opportunity for quality improvement and intersectional synergy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77774792021-01-07 122. The Buck Stops Here. PICC Line Utilization: Stewardship Is Not Only About Antimicrobials Any More Ridder, Mark Cawcutt, Kelly Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: The Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend avoiding placement of PICCs in patients with GFRs less than 45. A recent study found that 1 in 4 PICCs are placed in patients with CKD and the majority of PICCs are for antibiotics. Recent studies have demonstrated early and safe transition from IV to PO antibiotics forgoing PICC use. To our knowledge no studies assess opportunities to reduce PICC use and adverse events through infectious disease. This study aims to identify opportunities for improved PICC utilization. METHODS: This was a single center retrospective analysis of all PICCs in adults from January 2017 to October 2019 at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC). Data was abstracted via chart review including demographics, index hospital stay, PICC details, PICC indication(s), PICC duration, GFR prior to PICC placement. If present, antimicrobial indication, and infection information. RESULTS: 211 patients were included. PICC lines were placed in 18.0% (n=38) of patients with GFR < 45. 123 PICCs were for antibiotics. Breakdown of IV antibiotic duration in Figure 1. Infection types treated in < 7 days noted in Figure 2. Infection types treated in 7 – 13 days noted in Figure 2. There was a statistically significant finding of increased duration of antibiotics when infectious disease was consulted with 90.0% (n=63) of cases 14 + days, 60.9% (n = 14) for 7 – 13 days, and 56.7% (n=17) in cases < 7 days (p=0.002). Figure 1 [Image: see text] Figure 2 [Image: see text] Figure 3 [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Infectious disease providers are trained to consider antimicrobial stewardship. Antimicrobials directly impact therapeutic choices for patients. However, less frequently considered is the insertion of PICCs in patients with tenuous renal function. Given the prevalence of PICCs in patients with GFR < 45, contrary to guideline recommendations, as well as increasing evidence for use of shorter durations and oral antibiotics for treatment there is opportunity for quality improvement and intersectional synergy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777479/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.167 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Ridder, Mark
Cawcutt, Kelly
122. The Buck Stops Here. PICC Line Utilization: Stewardship Is Not Only About Antimicrobials Any More
title 122. The Buck Stops Here. PICC Line Utilization: Stewardship Is Not Only About Antimicrobials Any More
title_full 122. The Buck Stops Here. PICC Line Utilization: Stewardship Is Not Only About Antimicrobials Any More
title_fullStr 122. The Buck Stops Here. PICC Line Utilization: Stewardship Is Not Only About Antimicrobials Any More
title_full_unstemmed 122. The Buck Stops Here. PICC Line Utilization: Stewardship Is Not Only About Antimicrobials Any More
title_short 122. The Buck Stops Here. PICC Line Utilization: Stewardship Is Not Only About Antimicrobials Any More
title_sort 122. the buck stops here. picc line utilization: stewardship is not only about antimicrobials any more
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777479/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.167
work_keys_str_mv AT riddermark 122thebuckstopsherepicclineutilizationstewardshipisnotonlyaboutantimicrobialsanymore
AT cawcuttkelly 122thebuckstopsherepicclineutilizationstewardshipisnotonlyaboutantimicrobialsanymore