Cargando…

1069. Loss to follow-up does not impact SVR for HCV infection

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in hepatitis C treatment using direct acting antiviral (DAA) agents can lead to sustained virologic response (SVR) in almost all treated subjects. These data along with the availability of generic DAAs have generated optimism to eliminate HCV infection globally. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kottilil, Sita K, Kamat, Mrunal, Gupte, Amit, Shah, Samir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777501/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1255
_version_ 1783630916357193728
author Kottilil, Sita K
Kamat, Mrunal
Gupte, Amit
Shah, Samir
author_facet Kottilil, Sita K
Kamat, Mrunal
Gupte, Amit
Shah, Samir
author_sort Kottilil, Sita K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent advances in hepatitis C treatment using direct acting antiviral (DAA) agents can lead to sustained virologic response (SVR) in almost all treated subjects. These data along with the availability of generic DAAs have generated optimism to eliminate HCV infection globally. However, recent pilot projects aimed at HCV elimination have resulted in disappointing SVR due to lack of follow up of patients after they complete treatment. In this study, we evaluated the SVR among those who did not follow up for the 12 week post treatment visit versus that of those who did, Aim – To determine SVR among those who follow up compared to those who have delayed follow up to assess SVR. Table [Image: see text] METHODS: 226 patients who underwent treatment for hepatitis C in a subspecialty clinic in Mumbai, India between 2014-16, with complete laboratory and clinical data available were included in this analysis. All patients completed 12 weeks of treatment with an approved DAA regimen. 137 patients had adequate follow up post treatment for SVR (Group A) and 89 patients were “no shows” for SVR (Group B) and had to be actively followed to obtain HCV RNA levels at least 4 weeks after SVR visit. Graph Pad prizm and student t test were used to determine the difference between SVR among the two groups. RESULTS: Demographics of both groups of patients are shown in the table below. SVR for the patients with good follow up (Group A) was 97.1% (133/137) and that of patients with poor follow up (Group B) was 97.8% (87/89), which was not statistically different (p >0.05). There were no baseline demographics that was associated with poor follow up, including age, gender, genotype, baseline fibrosis score, ALT levels, previous treatment status, or duration of treatment (P >0.05) CONCLUSION: Lack of follow up after completion of treatment with DAAs is associated with identical SVR compared to those with adequate follow up. These findings suggest lack of follow up after completion of treatment should have minimal effect on HCV elimination projects. In the future, HCV elimination projects need not focus on determination of SVR as long as treatment follow up is ensured DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77775012021-01-07 1069. Loss to follow-up does not impact SVR for HCV infection Kottilil, Sita K Kamat, Mrunal Gupte, Amit Shah, Samir Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Recent advances in hepatitis C treatment using direct acting antiviral (DAA) agents can lead to sustained virologic response (SVR) in almost all treated subjects. These data along with the availability of generic DAAs have generated optimism to eliminate HCV infection globally. However, recent pilot projects aimed at HCV elimination have resulted in disappointing SVR due to lack of follow up of patients after they complete treatment. In this study, we evaluated the SVR among those who did not follow up for the 12 week post treatment visit versus that of those who did, Aim – To determine SVR among those who follow up compared to those who have delayed follow up to assess SVR. Table [Image: see text] METHODS: 226 patients who underwent treatment for hepatitis C in a subspecialty clinic in Mumbai, India between 2014-16, with complete laboratory and clinical data available were included in this analysis. All patients completed 12 weeks of treatment with an approved DAA regimen. 137 patients had adequate follow up post treatment for SVR (Group A) and 89 patients were “no shows” for SVR (Group B) and had to be actively followed to obtain HCV RNA levels at least 4 weeks after SVR visit. Graph Pad prizm and student t test were used to determine the difference between SVR among the two groups. RESULTS: Demographics of both groups of patients are shown in the table below. SVR for the patients with good follow up (Group A) was 97.1% (133/137) and that of patients with poor follow up (Group B) was 97.8% (87/89), which was not statistically different (p >0.05). There were no baseline demographics that was associated with poor follow up, including age, gender, genotype, baseline fibrosis score, ALT levels, previous treatment status, or duration of treatment (P >0.05) CONCLUSION: Lack of follow up after completion of treatment with DAAs is associated with identical SVR compared to those with adequate follow up. These findings suggest lack of follow up after completion of treatment should have minimal effect on HCV elimination projects. In the future, HCV elimination projects need not focus on determination of SVR as long as treatment follow up is ensured DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777501/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1255 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Kottilil, Sita K
Kamat, Mrunal
Gupte, Amit
Shah, Samir
1069. Loss to follow-up does not impact SVR for HCV infection
title 1069. Loss to follow-up does not impact SVR for HCV infection
title_full 1069. Loss to follow-up does not impact SVR for HCV infection
title_fullStr 1069. Loss to follow-up does not impact SVR for HCV infection
title_full_unstemmed 1069. Loss to follow-up does not impact SVR for HCV infection
title_short 1069. Loss to follow-up does not impact SVR for HCV infection
title_sort 1069. loss to follow-up does not impact svr for hcv infection
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777501/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1255
work_keys_str_mv AT kottililsitak 1069losstofollowupdoesnotimpactsvrforhcvinfection
AT kamatmrunal 1069losstofollowupdoesnotimpactsvrforhcvinfection
AT gupteamit 1069losstofollowupdoesnotimpactsvrforhcvinfection
AT shahsamir 1069losstofollowupdoesnotimpactsvrforhcvinfection