Cargando…

102. Effects of an Antimicrobial Stewardship-guided MRSA Nasal Screening Review on Vancomycin Utilization for Respiratory Infections: A Quasi-Experimental Study

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a significant pathogen in patients with respiratory infections. Guidelines recommend empiric MRSA coverage in patients at increased risk, resulting in substantial vancomycin use. Recent literature highlights the use of MRSA nasal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pineda, Ross, Kanatani, Meganne, Deville, Jaime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777579/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.147
_version_ 1783630934886580224
author Pineda, Ross
Kanatani, Meganne
Deville, Jaime
author_facet Pineda, Ross
Kanatani, Meganne
Deville, Jaime
author_sort Pineda, Ross
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a significant pathogen in patients with respiratory infections. Guidelines recommend empiric MRSA coverage in patients at increased risk, resulting in substantial vancomycin use. Recent literature highlights the use of MRSA nasal assays as a rapid screening tool for MRSA pneumonia, demonstrating high negative predictive values and allowing for shorter empiric coverage. We aimed to evaluate the impact of MRSA nasal screening review by the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on vancomycin utilization for respiratory infections. METHODS: This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental, pre-post intervention study. The intervention saw the addition of an MRSA screening review tool into the ASP electronic record, highlighting patients on vancomycin (actively or recently administered) with a negative MRSA screening. Vancomycin days of therapy (DOT) was collected for all orders indicated for a respiratory infection in the two weeks following a negative screening. Additional outcomes include vancomycin total dose and DOT per 1,000 patient days. Outcomes were compared via independent samples t-tests. RESULTS: 1,110 MRSA screenings resulted across 2 months, of which the majority were excluded for either not having vancomycin ordered, or for having vancomycin ordered for a non-respiratory indication, leaving 37 and 35 evaluable screenings in the pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively. Regarding vancomycin DOT, we did not identify a significant difference between pre- and post-intervention groups with respective means of 2.45 (SD=1.52) and 2.14 (SD=1.12) (p=0.35). We identified a total 8.78 vancomycin DOT per 1,000 patient days in the pre-intervention group versus 6.69 in the post-intervention group. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: ASP-guided review of MRSA screenings was associated with a nonsignificant decrease in mean vancomycin DOT and lower total DOT per 1,000 patient days for respiratory infections following a negative screen. Given the recent implementation of our intervention, our analysis covered a small sample size, highlighting the need for continued data collection. MRSA screenings are not always fully or immediately utilized in our institution, demonstrating room to de-escalate MRSA-targeted antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77775792021-01-07 102. Effects of an Antimicrobial Stewardship-guided MRSA Nasal Screening Review on Vancomycin Utilization for Respiratory Infections: A Quasi-Experimental Study Pineda, Ross Kanatani, Meganne Deville, Jaime Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a significant pathogen in patients with respiratory infections. Guidelines recommend empiric MRSA coverage in patients at increased risk, resulting in substantial vancomycin use. Recent literature highlights the use of MRSA nasal assays as a rapid screening tool for MRSA pneumonia, demonstrating high negative predictive values and allowing for shorter empiric coverage. We aimed to evaluate the impact of MRSA nasal screening review by the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on vancomycin utilization for respiratory infections. METHODS: This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental, pre-post intervention study. The intervention saw the addition of an MRSA screening review tool into the ASP electronic record, highlighting patients on vancomycin (actively or recently administered) with a negative MRSA screening. Vancomycin days of therapy (DOT) was collected for all orders indicated for a respiratory infection in the two weeks following a negative screening. Additional outcomes include vancomycin total dose and DOT per 1,000 patient days. Outcomes were compared via independent samples t-tests. RESULTS: 1,110 MRSA screenings resulted across 2 months, of which the majority were excluded for either not having vancomycin ordered, or for having vancomycin ordered for a non-respiratory indication, leaving 37 and 35 evaluable screenings in the pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively. Regarding vancomycin DOT, we did not identify a significant difference between pre- and post-intervention groups with respective means of 2.45 (SD=1.52) and 2.14 (SD=1.12) (p=0.35). We identified a total 8.78 vancomycin DOT per 1,000 patient days in the pre-intervention group versus 6.69 in the post-intervention group. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: ASP-guided review of MRSA screenings was associated with a nonsignificant decrease in mean vancomycin DOT and lower total DOT per 1,000 patient days for respiratory infections following a negative screen. Given the recent implementation of our intervention, our analysis covered a small sample size, highlighting the need for continued data collection. MRSA screenings are not always fully or immediately utilized in our institution, demonstrating room to de-escalate MRSA-targeted antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777579/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.147 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Pineda, Ross
Kanatani, Meganne
Deville, Jaime
102. Effects of an Antimicrobial Stewardship-guided MRSA Nasal Screening Review on Vancomycin Utilization for Respiratory Infections: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title 102. Effects of an Antimicrobial Stewardship-guided MRSA Nasal Screening Review on Vancomycin Utilization for Respiratory Infections: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_full 102. Effects of an Antimicrobial Stewardship-guided MRSA Nasal Screening Review on Vancomycin Utilization for Respiratory Infections: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_fullStr 102. Effects of an Antimicrobial Stewardship-guided MRSA Nasal Screening Review on Vancomycin Utilization for Respiratory Infections: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_full_unstemmed 102. Effects of an Antimicrobial Stewardship-guided MRSA Nasal Screening Review on Vancomycin Utilization for Respiratory Infections: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_short 102. Effects of an Antimicrobial Stewardship-guided MRSA Nasal Screening Review on Vancomycin Utilization for Respiratory Infections: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_sort 102. effects of an antimicrobial stewardship-guided mrsa nasal screening review on vancomycin utilization for respiratory infections: a quasi-experimental study
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777579/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.147
work_keys_str_mv AT pinedaross 102effectsofanantimicrobialstewardshipguidedmrsanasalscreeningreviewonvancomycinutilizationforrespiratoryinfectionsaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT kanatanimeganne 102effectsofanantimicrobialstewardshipguidedmrsanasalscreeningreviewonvancomycinutilizationforrespiratoryinfectionsaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT devillejaime 102effectsofanantimicrobialstewardshipguidedmrsanasalscreeningreviewonvancomycinutilizationforrespiratoryinfectionsaquasiexperimentalstudy