Cargando…

732. Evaulation of Micafungin Treatment at Pediatric Patients: A cross-sectional Study from Tertiary Pediatric Centre

BACKGROUND: Micafungin is one of three currently available echinocandin for treatment of candidiasis and candidemia. METHODS: Children who were treated for micafungin for possible or proven invasive Candidia infection between May 2017 and October 2019 were included. RESULTS: In this cross-sectional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arıkan, Kamile, Bayram, Nuri, devrim, İlker, Akaslan-Kara, Ayküke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777664/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.924
_version_ 1783630955342200832
author Arıkan, Kamile
Bayram, Nuri
devrim, İlker
Akaslan-Kara, Ayküke
author_facet Arıkan, Kamile
Bayram, Nuri
devrim, İlker
Akaslan-Kara, Ayküke
author_sort Arıkan, Kamile
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Micafungin is one of three currently available echinocandin for treatment of candidiasis and candidemia. METHODS: Children who were treated for micafungin for possible or proven invasive Candidia infection between May 2017 and October 2019 were included. RESULTS: In this cross-sectional study, totally 78 children with a median age of 3 months (8 days -17 years), 50 (64.1%, F/M: 0.56) male were included. Thirty four (43.6%) patients were neonate, 26 (76 %) of them were premature. Thirty seven patients (47.4%) received micafungin for candidemia and 41 (52.6%) patients received micafungin empirically for IC. Twelve (32.4%) Candida spp cultured were C. albicans, the rest twenty five (67.6%) Candida spp were non-albicans Candida spp. The most commonly cultured Candida spp was Candida parapsilosis (C. parapsilosis) (n=13) followed by C. albicans (n=12), C. glabrata (n=3), C. tropicalis (n=3), C. guilliermondii (n=3), C. krusei (n=2) respectively. Resistance rate of C. parapsilosis (n=13) isolates to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin, micafungin were as follows respectively; 66.7%, 100%, 69.2%, 90.9%, 37.5% respectively. Resistance rate of C. albicans (n=11) isolates to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin, micafungin were as follows respectively; 50%, 50%, 12.5%, 42.9%, 0% respectively. None of the C. tropicalis, C. guilliermondii and C. krusei isolates were resistant to micafungin. Culture negativity could not be achieved at the end of 14th day of micafungin treatment in the 15 (16.9%) candidemia episodes. The most commonly isolated Candida spp in patients with treatment failure was C. parapsilosis (n=7), the other species were; C. albicans (n=5), C. guilliermondii (n=1), C. tropicalis (n=1) and C. tropicalis and C. guilliermondii coinfection (n=1) respectively. Median serum AST, ALT and creatinin levels didn’t increase during and at the end of micafungin therapy. None of these patients had experienced an anormal kidney or liver function tests due to micafungin usage. Characteristics of patients who received micafungin.and cultured Candida spp [Image: see text] Antifungal resistance patterns of Candida spp. [Image: see text] Laboratory change before and after micafungin treatment [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Increase in fluconazole resistant Candida spp makes micafungin a reasonable and effective choice for suspected or proven invasive candidiasis DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77776642021-01-07 732. Evaulation of Micafungin Treatment at Pediatric Patients: A cross-sectional Study from Tertiary Pediatric Centre Arıkan, Kamile Bayram, Nuri devrim, İlker Akaslan-Kara, Ayküke Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Micafungin is one of three currently available echinocandin for treatment of candidiasis and candidemia. METHODS: Children who were treated for micafungin for possible or proven invasive Candidia infection between May 2017 and October 2019 were included. RESULTS: In this cross-sectional study, totally 78 children with a median age of 3 months (8 days -17 years), 50 (64.1%, F/M: 0.56) male were included. Thirty four (43.6%) patients were neonate, 26 (76 %) of them were premature. Thirty seven patients (47.4%) received micafungin for candidemia and 41 (52.6%) patients received micafungin empirically for IC. Twelve (32.4%) Candida spp cultured were C. albicans, the rest twenty five (67.6%) Candida spp were non-albicans Candida spp. The most commonly cultured Candida spp was Candida parapsilosis (C. parapsilosis) (n=13) followed by C. albicans (n=12), C. glabrata (n=3), C. tropicalis (n=3), C. guilliermondii (n=3), C. krusei (n=2) respectively. Resistance rate of C. parapsilosis (n=13) isolates to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin, micafungin were as follows respectively; 66.7%, 100%, 69.2%, 90.9%, 37.5% respectively. Resistance rate of C. albicans (n=11) isolates to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin, micafungin were as follows respectively; 50%, 50%, 12.5%, 42.9%, 0% respectively. None of the C. tropicalis, C. guilliermondii and C. krusei isolates were resistant to micafungin. Culture negativity could not be achieved at the end of 14th day of micafungin treatment in the 15 (16.9%) candidemia episodes. The most commonly isolated Candida spp in patients with treatment failure was C. parapsilosis (n=7), the other species were; C. albicans (n=5), C. guilliermondii (n=1), C. tropicalis (n=1) and C. tropicalis and C. guilliermondii coinfection (n=1) respectively. Median serum AST, ALT and creatinin levels didn’t increase during and at the end of micafungin therapy. None of these patients had experienced an anormal kidney or liver function tests due to micafungin usage. Characteristics of patients who received micafungin.and cultured Candida spp [Image: see text] Antifungal resistance patterns of Candida spp. [Image: see text] Laboratory change before and after micafungin treatment [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Increase in fluconazole resistant Candida spp makes micafungin a reasonable and effective choice for suspected or proven invasive candidiasis DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777664/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.924 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Arıkan, Kamile
Bayram, Nuri
devrim, İlker
Akaslan-Kara, Ayküke
732. Evaulation of Micafungin Treatment at Pediatric Patients: A cross-sectional Study from Tertiary Pediatric Centre
title 732. Evaulation of Micafungin Treatment at Pediatric Patients: A cross-sectional Study from Tertiary Pediatric Centre
title_full 732. Evaulation of Micafungin Treatment at Pediatric Patients: A cross-sectional Study from Tertiary Pediatric Centre
title_fullStr 732. Evaulation of Micafungin Treatment at Pediatric Patients: A cross-sectional Study from Tertiary Pediatric Centre
title_full_unstemmed 732. Evaulation of Micafungin Treatment at Pediatric Patients: A cross-sectional Study from Tertiary Pediatric Centre
title_short 732. Evaulation of Micafungin Treatment at Pediatric Patients: A cross-sectional Study from Tertiary Pediatric Centre
title_sort 732. evaulation of micafungin treatment at pediatric patients: a cross-sectional study from tertiary pediatric centre
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777664/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.924
work_keys_str_mv AT arıkankamile 732evaulationofmicafungintreatmentatpediatricpatientsacrosssectionalstudyfromtertiarypediatriccentre
AT bayramnuri 732evaulationofmicafungintreatmentatpediatricpatientsacrosssectionalstudyfromtertiarypediatriccentre
AT devrimilker 732evaulationofmicafungintreatmentatpediatricpatientsacrosssectionalstudyfromtertiarypediatriccentre
AT akaslankaraaykuke 732evaulationofmicafungintreatmentatpediatricpatientsacrosssectionalstudyfromtertiarypediatriccentre