Cargando…
65. Vaccine Confidence, COVID19, and the Influence of Peer Networks
BACKGROUND: An increased appreciation for vaccines could be expected due to COVID-19. However, surveys show a polarization in opinions with about 20% of Americans preemptively rejecting any COVID-19 vaccine, partly due to inconsistent risk communication. While Health Care Professionals (HCPs) will b...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777688/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.375 |
_version_ | 1783630961056940032 |
---|---|
author | Vojtek, Ivo Palsenbarg, Vanessa Smyser, Joe |
author_facet | Vojtek, Ivo Palsenbarg, Vanessa Smyser, Joe |
author_sort | Vojtek, Ivo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An increased appreciation for vaccines could be expected due to COVID-19. However, surveys show a polarization in opinions with about 20% of Americans preemptively rejecting any COVID-19 vaccine, partly due to inconsistent risk communication. While Health Care Professionals (HCPs) will be heavily relied upon to encourage uptake of a COVID-19 vaccine and 70% of Americans receive their vaccine information from HCPs, 84% also rely on peer networks. Understanding that HCPs have an important, but not exclusive, influence on health decision making can signal a new approach. This study provides data on where women, the main decision-makers regarding immunization in most families access information about vaccination. METHODS: Through an online survey conducted in UK, Brazil, Germany, Italy and Canada from 10 to 19-March 2020, we collected data on where, and from whom, women aged 25–54 years access information about vaccination. We set 1000 respondents/country quotas to reflect regional differences with data weighted as necessary. RESULTS: 5,036 women who met inclusion criteria responded: from the UK (1,003), Brazil (1,002), Germany (1,008), Italy (1,007), and Canada (1,016). Though most likely to receive vaccination info via their HCP: in Germany, women are least likely to be influenced by HCPs, with those aged 25–34 years more likely to turn to family members or online sources; in the UK, they are more likely to find info via a health authority’s website; and in Brazil, they are more likely to see info in traditional media and on Facebook. Only 50% ranked vaccine efficacy and disease risk in the Top 5 factors influencing their vaccine decisions, alongside the opinion of an HCP, recommendation of a Public Health Authority and impact of the disease. CONCLUSION: HCPs, families and peers are important sources of info regarding vaccination. COVID-19 is unlikely to improve vaccine confidence as the issue becomes increasingly polarized and communications more inconsistent. We can respond by investing in health promotion and harmonized communications through peer networks. Since caregivers, their families and peers have increased weight in vaccination decisions, then they should have increased weight in preventive health strategies. DISCLOSURES: Ivo Vojtek, PharmD, PhD, MSc, FRSM, RPh, GSK Vaccines (Employee, Shareholder) Vanessa Palsenbarg, MA, GSK Vaccines (Employee, Shareholder) Joe Smyser, PhD, Public Good Project (Board Member, Employee) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7777688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77776882021-01-07 65. Vaccine Confidence, COVID19, and the Influence of Peer Networks Vojtek, Ivo Palsenbarg, Vanessa Smyser, Joe Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: An increased appreciation for vaccines could be expected due to COVID-19. However, surveys show a polarization in opinions with about 20% of Americans preemptively rejecting any COVID-19 vaccine, partly due to inconsistent risk communication. While Health Care Professionals (HCPs) will be heavily relied upon to encourage uptake of a COVID-19 vaccine and 70% of Americans receive their vaccine information from HCPs, 84% also rely on peer networks. Understanding that HCPs have an important, but not exclusive, influence on health decision making can signal a new approach. This study provides data on where women, the main decision-makers regarding immunization in most families access information about vaccination. METHODS: Through an online survey conducted in UK, Brazil, Germany, Italy and Canada from 10 to 19-March 2020, we collected data on where, and from whom, women aged 25–54 years access information about vaccination. We set 1000 respondents/country quotas to reflect regional differences with data weighted as necessary. RESULTS: 5,036 women who met inclusion criteria responded: from the UK (1,003), Brazil (1,002), Germany (1,008), Italy (1,007), and Canada (1,016). Though most likely to receive vaccination info via their HCP: in Germany, women are least likely to be influenced by HCPs, with those aged 25–34 years more likely to turn to family members or online sources; in the UK, they are more likely to find info via a health authority’s website; and in Brazil, they are more likely to see info in traditional media and on Facebook. Only 50% ranked vaccine efficacy and disease risk in the Top 5 factors influencing their vaccine decisions, alongside the opinion of an HCP, recommendation of a Public Health Authority and impact of the disease. CONCLUSION: HCPs, families and peers are important sources of info regarding vaccination. COVID-19 is unlikely to improve vaccine confidence as the issue becomes increasingly polarized and communications more inconsistent. We can respond by investing in health promotion and harmonized communications through peer networks. Since caregivers, their families and peers have increased weight in vaccination decisions, then they should have increased weight in preventive health strategies. DISCLOSURES: Ivo Vojtek, PharmD, PhD, MSc, FRSM, RPh, GSK Vaccines (Employee, Shareholder) Vanessa Palsenbarg, MA, GSK Vaccines (Employee, Shareholder) Joe Smyser, PhD, Public Good Project (Board Member, Employee) Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777688/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.375 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Vojtek, Ivo Palsenbarg, Vanessa Smyser, Joe 65. Vaccine Confidence, COVID19, and the Influence of Peer Networks |
title | 65. Vaccine Confidence, COVID19, and the Influence of Peer Networks |
title_full | 65. Vaccine Confidence, COVID19, and the Influence of Peer Networks |
title_fullStr | 65. Vaccine Confidence, COVID19, and the Influence of Peer Networks |
title_full_unstemmed | 65. Vaccine Confidence, COVID19, and the Influence of Peer Networks |
title_short | 65. Vaccine Confidence, COVID19, and the Influence of Peer Networks |
title_sort | 65. vaccine confidence, covid19, and the influence of peer networks |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777688/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.375 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vojtekivo 65vaccineconfidencecovid19andtheinfluenceofpeernetworks AT palsenbargvanessa 65vaccineconfidencecovid19andtheinfluenceofpeernetworks AT smyserjoe 65vaccineconfidencecovid19andtheinfluenceofpeernetworks |