Cargando…

173. Identification of Inappropriate Antibiotic Orders During a Pharmacy-Supported Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the Primary Care Setting: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND: In Florida, the number of antibiotic prescriptions has increased from 710–779 prescription/1000 population in 2012 to 748–839 prescription/1000 population in 2017. Antimicrobial stewardship in the outpatient setting is a suggested solution to combat antibiotics misuse in ambulatory pract...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eckardt, Paula, Mohammed, Sheerida Hosein, Singh-Franco, Devada, Wolowich, William R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777694/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.217
_version_ 1783630962486149120
author Eckardt, Paula
Mohammed, Sheerida Hosein
Singh-Franco, Devada
Wolowich, William R
author_facet Eckardt, Paula
Mohammed, Sheerida Hosein
Singh-Franco, Devada
Wolowich, William R
author_sort Eckardt, Paula
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Florida, the number of antibiotic prescriptions has increased from 710–779 prescription/1000 population in 2012 to 748–839 prescription/1000 population in 2017. Antimicrobial stewardship in the outpatient setting is a suggested solution to combat antibiotics misuse in ambulatory practices. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of oral antimicrobial orders generated by primary care providers. The research protocol received approval from Memorial Healthcare System’s Institutional Review Board prior to any research related analysis being conducted. Orders from January 1-December 31, 2018 were reviewed for appropriateness by pharmacy based on IDSA guidelines. Appropriateness was assessed based on the need to prescribe the antibiotic for indication, selection, dose and duration of therapy. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze data. RESULTS: Of 2995 orders, 50.2% were inappropriate. The most common infections associated with inappropriate antibiotic use were upper/lower respiratory tract infections (URTIs (65%) and LRTIs (61%)), oral cavity infections (61%), and skin/soft tissue infections (SSTI (54%)). Inappropriately-prescribed antibiotics were penicillin (62%), cephalosporins (56%), quinolones (50%), macrolides (49%), and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (46%). Penicillin use for URTIs were inappropriate (406 orders) for the following reasons: duration of therapy only 116/137 (85%); dose and duration 36/58 (62%), drug and dose 12/58 (21%) and all three (drug, dose, duration 85/93 (91%)). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a pharmacist-driven antibiotic stewardship program in the primary care setting identified a significant proportion of orders that were inappropriate for type of antibiotic, dose, and duration of therapy in the management of patients with URTIs. These results serve as an avenue to implement the audit feedback process to promote appropriate use of antibiotics. A process improvement plan will include sharing of the findings, educating primary care physicians per IDSA guidelines and continuous review of prescribing trends. A programmatic evaluation will continue on an on-going basis to decrease the number of inappropriately prescribed antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77776942021-01-07 173. Identification of Inappropriate Antibiotic Orders During a Pharmacy-Supported Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the Primary Care Setting: A Retrospective Analysis Eckardt, Paula Mohammed, Sheerida Hosein Singh-Franco, Devada Wolowich, William R Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: In Florida, the number of antibiotic prescriptions has increased from 710–779 prescription/1000 population in 2012 to 748–839 prescription/1000 population in 2017. Antimicrobial stewardship in the outpatient setting is a suggested solution to combat antibiotics misuse in ambulatory practices. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of oral antimicrobial orders generated by primary care providers. The research protocol received approval from Memorial Healthcare System’s Institutional Review Board prior to any research related analysis being conducted. Orders from January 1-December 31, 2018 were reviewed for appropriateness by pharmacy based on IDSA guidelines. Appropriateness was assessed based on the need to prescribe the antibiotic for indication, selection, dose and duration of therapy. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze data. RESULTS: Of 2995 orders, 50.2% were inappropriate. The most common infections associated with inappropriate antibiotic use were upper/lower respiratory tract infections (URTIs (65%) and LRTIs (61%)), oral cavity infections (61%), and skin/soft tissue infections (SSTI (54%)). Inappropriately-prescribed antibiotics were penicillin (62%), cephalosporins (56%), quinolones (50%), macrolides (49%), and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (46%). Penicillin use for URTIs were inappropriate (406 orders) for the following reasons: duration of therapy only 116/137 (85%); dose and duration 36/58 (62%), drug and dose 12/58 (21%) and all three (drug, dose, duration 85/93 (91%)). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a pharmacist-driven antibiotic stewardship program in the primary care setting identified a significant proportion of orders that were inappropriate for type of antibiotic, dose, and duration of therapy in the management of patients with URTIs. These results serve as an avenue to implement the audit feedback process to promote appropriate use of antibiotics. A process improvement plan will include sharing of the findings, educating primary care physicians per IDSA guidelines and continuous review of prescribing trends. A programmatic evaluation will continue on an on-going basis to decrease the number of inappropriately prescribed antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777694/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.217 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Eckardt, Paula
Mohammed, Sheerida Hosein
Singh-Franco, Devada
Wolowich, William R
173. Identification of Inappropriate Antibiotic Orders During a Pharmacy-Supported Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the Primary Care Setting: A Retrospective Analysis
title 173. Identification of Inappropriate Antibiotic Orders During a Pharmacy-Supported Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the Primary Care Setting: A Retrospective Analysis
title_full 173. Identification of Inappropriate Antibiotic Orders During a Pharmacy-Supported Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the Primary Care Setting: A Retrospective Analysis
title_fullStr 173. Identification of Inappropriate Antibiotic Orders During a Pharmacy-Supported Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the Primary Care Setting: A Retrospective Analysis
title_full_unstemmed 173. Identification of Inappropriate Antibiotic Orders During a Pharmacy-Supported Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the Primary Care Setting: A Retrospective Analysis
title_short 173. Identification of Inappropriate Antibiotic Orders During a Pharmacy-Supported Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the Primary Care Setting: A Retrospective Analysis
title_sort 173. identification of inappropriate antibiotic orders during a pharmacy-supported antimicrobial stewardship program in the primary care setting: a retrospective analysis
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777694/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.217
work_keys_str_mv AT eckardtpaula 173identificationofinappropriateantibioticordersduringapharmacysupportedantimicrobialstewardshipprogramintheprimarycaresettingaretrospectiveanalysis
AT mohammedsheeridahosein 173identificationofinappropriateantibioticordersduringapharmacysupportedantimicrobialstewardshipprogramintheprimarycaresettingaretrospectiveanalysis
AT singhfrancodevada 173identificationofinappropriateantibioticordersduringapharmacysupportedantimicrobialstewardshipprogramintheprimarycaresettingaretrospectiveanalysis
AT wolowichwilliamr 173identificationofinappropriateantibioticordersduringapharmacysupportedantimicrobialstewardshipprogramintheprimarycaresettingaretrospectiveanalysis