Cargando…
1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process
BACKGROUND: In 2018, a review of the scientific literature identifed biofilm studies in the past 3 years. Wherein, the role of the biofilm in the progression of the diabetic foot ulcer with the presence of biofilm is reviewed. As a result, tissue sampling is more effective than transcure, Levin, and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777837/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1728 |
_version_ | 1783630996242956288 |
---|---|
author | Loveras, Alexander A Ozoria Espinal, Jacques Paré de luna, David Acevedo, Noemi |
author_facet | Loveras, Alexander A Ozoria Espinal, Jacques Paré de luna, David Acevedo, Noemi |
author_sort | Loveras, Alexander A Ozoria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2018, a review of the scientific literature identifed biofilm studies in the past 3 years. Wherein, the role of the biofilm in the progression of the diabetic foot ulcer with the presence of biofilm is reviewed. As a result, tissue sampling is more effective than transcure, Levin, and aspiration. A study in Cuba evaluate the effectiveness of a new proposal for antimicrobial treatment in patients with diabetic foot infection in 2017. The method used was a experimental type of two groups. The control group, was treated with the treatment scheme proposed in the Comprehensive Care Program for the patient with diabetic foot ulcer (PAIPUPD). Instead, the other experimental group was treated according to the scheme based on the local microbial map. They used a random distribution. Using the Wagner classification, there were patients classificate with a grade of W2 (13% of patients), W3 (66%) and W4 (12%). The most frequent germs found were Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Enterobacter sp. The experimental group required less days with hospitalization. METHODS: This is an observational study of primary source with a non-probability sample with 58 patients. Adult patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with diabetic foot, Wagner classification 1, 2 and 3, who attended the healing area of the Institute of Diabetes of Santiago were included. After identifying the colonized pathogen, its cicatrization process was evaluate for four weeks. RESULTS: Of the total sample, 12.07% belonged to Wagner 1, 43.1% to Wagner 2 and 44.83% to the Wagner 3 classification. In the case of the Wagner 3 group, S. aureus and Pseudomona aeruginosa were present in 6 cases. Despite the infectious processes detected by the culture, the patients showed a successful cicatrization process after four weeks of evaluation. Graph 1: Isolated Microorganism Vs Wagner’s Degree (n=60) [Image: see text] Graph 2: Gram positive microorganism vs. healing process per week in patients with diabetic foot (n=22) [Image: see text] Graph 3: Gram-negative microorganism vs. healing process (n=33) [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: During the four weeks of clinical evaluation, more than 88% of patients progressed positively to clinical recovery, regardless of the type of bacteria colonized and/or their resistance to antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7777837 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77778372021-01-07 1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process Loveras, Alexander A Ozoria Espinal, Jacques Paré de luna, David Acevedo, Noemi Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: In 2018, a review of the scientific literature identifed biofilm studies in the past 3 years. Wherein, the role of the biofilm in the progression of the diabetic foot ulcer with the presence of biofilm is reviewed. As a result, tissue sampling is more effective than transcure, Levin, and aspiration. A study in Cuba evaluate the effectiveness of a new proposal for antimicrobial treatment in patients with diabetic foot infection in 2017. The method used was a experimental type of two groups. The control group, was treated with the treatment scheme proposed in the Comprehensive Care Program for the patient with diabetic foot ulcer (PAIPUPD). Instead, the other experimental group was treated according to the scheme based on the local microbial map. They used a random distribution. Using the Wagner classification, there were patients classificate with a grade of W2 (13% of patients), W3 (66%) and W4 (12%). The most frequent germs found were Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Enterobacter sp. The experimental group required less days with hospitalization. METHODS: This is an observational study of primary source with a non-probability sample with 58 patients. Adult patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with diabetic foot, Wagner classification 1, 2 and 3, who attended the healing area of the Institute of Diabetes of Santiago were included. After identifying the colonized pathogen, its cicatrization process was evaluate for four weeks. RESULTS: Of the total sample, 12.07% belonged to Wagner 1, 43.1% to Wagner 2 and 44.83% to the Wagner 3 classification. In the case of the Wagner 3 group, S. aureus and Pseudomona aeruginosa were present in 6 cases. Despite the infectious processes detected by the culture, the patients showed a successful cicatrization process after four weeks of evaluation. Graph 1: Isolated Microorganism Vs Wagner’s Degree (n=60) [Image: see text] Graph 2: Gram positive microorganism vs. healing process per week in patients with diabetic foot (n=22) [Image: see text] Graph 3: Gram-negative microorganism vs. healing process (n=33) [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: During the four weeks of clinical evaluation, more than 88% of patients progressed positively to clinical recovery, regardless of the type of bacteria colonized and/or their resistance to antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777837/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1728 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Loveras, Alexander A Ozoria Espinal, Jacques Paré de luna, David Acevedo, Noemi 1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process |
title | 1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process |
title_full | 1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process |
title_fullStr | 1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process |
title_full_unstemmed | 1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process |
title_short | 1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process |
title_sort | 1548. association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777837/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1728 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loverasalexanderaozoria 1548associationofbacterialcolonizationinulcerativelesionsofthediabeticfoottogetherwiththecicatrizationprocess AT espinaljacquespare 1548associationofbacterialcolonizationinulcerativelesionsofthediabeticfoottogetherwiththecicatrizationprocess AT delunadavid 1548associationofbacterialcolonizationinulcerativelesionsofthediabeticfoottogetherwiththecicatrizationprocess AT acevedonoemi 1548associationofbacterialcolonizationinulcerativelesionsofthediabeticfoottogetherwiththecicatrizationprocess |