Cargando…

1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process

BACKGROUND: In 2018, a review of the scientific literature identifed biofilm studies in the past 3 years. Wherein, the role of the biofilm in the progression of the diabetic foot ulcer with the presence of biofilm is reviewed. As a result, tissue sampling is more effective than transcure, Levin, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loveras, Alexander A Ozoria, Espinal, Jacques Paré, de luna, David, Acevedo, Noemi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777837/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1728
_version_ 1783630996242956288
author Loveras, Alexander A Ozoria
Espinal, Jacques Paré
de luna, David
Acevedo, Noemi
author_facet Loveras, Alexander A Ozoria
Espinal, Jacques Paré
de luna, David
Acevedo, Noemi
author_sort Loveras, Alexander A Ozoria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2018, a review of the scientific literature identifed biofilm studies in the past 3 years. Wherein, the role of the biofilm in the progression of the diabetic foot ulcer with the presence of biofilm is reviewed. As a result, tissue sampling is more effective than transcure, Levin, and aspiration. A study in Cuba evaluate the effectiveness of a new proposal for antimicrobial treatment in patients with diabetic foot infection in 2017. The method used was a experimental type of two groups. The control group, was treated with the treatment scheme proposed in the Comprehensive Care Program for the patient with diabetic foot ulcer (PAIPUPD). Instead, the other experimental group was treated according to the scheme based on the local microbial map. They used a random distribution. Using the Wagner classification, there were patients classificate with a grade of W2 (13% of patients), W3 (66%) and W4 (12%). The most frequent germs found were Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Enterobacter sp. The experimental group required less days with hospitalization. METHODS: This is an observational study of primary source with a non-probability sample with 58 patients. Adult patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with diabetic foot, Wagner classification 1, 2 and 3, who attended the healing area of the Institute of Diabetes of Santiago were included. After identifying the colonized pathogen, its cicatrization process was evaluate for four weeks. RESULTS: Of the total sample, 12.07% belonged to Wagner 1, 43.1% to Wagner 2 and 44.83% to the Wagner 3 classification. In the case of the Wagner 3 group, S. aureus and Pseudomona aeruginosa were present in 6 cases. Despite the infectious processes detected by the culture, the patients showed a successful cicatrization process after four weeks of evaluation. Graph 1: Isolated Microorganism Vs Wagner’s Degree (n=60) [Image: see text] Graph 2: Gram positive microorganism vs. healing process per week in patients with diabetic foot (n=22) [Image: see text] Graph 3: Gram-negative microorganism vs. healing process (n=33) [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: During the four weeks of clinical evaluation, more than 88% of patients progressed positively to clinical recovery, regardless of the type of bacteria colonized and/or their resistance to antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77778372021-01-07 1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process Loveras, Alexander A Ozoria Espinal, Jacques Paré de luna, David Acevedo, Noemi Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: In 2018, a review of the scientific literature identifed biofilm studies in the past 3 years. Wherein, the role of the biofilm in the progression of the diabetic foot ulcer with the presence of biofilm is reviewed. As a result, tissue sampling is more effective than transcure, Levin, and aspiration. A study in Cuba evaluate the effectiveness of a new proposal for antimicrobial treatment in patients with diabetic foot infection in 2017. The method used was a experimental type of two groups. The control group, was treated with the treatment scheme proposed in the Comprehensive Care Program for the patient with diabetic foot ulcer (PAIPUPD). Instead, the other experimental group was treated according to the scheme based on the local microbial map. They used a random distribution. Using the Wagner classification, there were patients classificate with a grade of W2 (13% of patients), W3 (66%) and W4 (12%). The most frequent germs found were Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Enterobacter sp. The experimental group required less days with hospitalization. METHODS: This is an observational study of primary source with a non-probability sample with 58 patients. Adult patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with diabetic foot, Wagner classification 1, 2 and 3, who attended the healing area of the Institute of Diabetes of Santiago were included. After identifying the colonized pathogen, its cicatrization process was evaluate for four weeks. RESULTS: Of the total sample, 12.07% belonged to Wagner 1, 43.1% to Wagner 2 and 44.83% to the Wagner 3 classification. In the case of the Wagner 3 group, S. aureus and Pseudomona aeruginosa were present in 6 cases. Despite the infectious processes detected by the culture, the patients showed a successful cicatrization process after four weeks of evaluation. Graph 1: Isolated Microorganism Vs Wagner’s Degree (n=60) [Image: see text] Graph 2: Gram positive microorganism vs. healing process per week in patients with diabetic foot (n=22) [Image: see text] Graph 3: Gram-negative microorganism vs. healing process (n=33) [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: During the four weeks of clinical evaluation, more than 88% of patients progressed positively to clinical recovery, regardless of the type of bacteria colonized and/or their resistance to antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777837/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1728 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Loveras, Alexander A Ozoria
Espinal, Jacques Paré
de luna, David
Acevedo, Noemi
1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process
title 1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process
title_full 1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process
title_fullStr 1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process
title_full_unstemmed 1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process
title_short 1548. Association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process
title_sort 1548. association of bacterial colonization in ulcerative lesions of the diabetic foot together with the cicatrization process
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777837/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1728
work_keys_str_mv AT loverasalexanderaozoria 1548associationofbacterialcolonizationinulcerativelesionsofthediabeticfoottogetherwiththecicatrizationprocess
AT espinaljacquespare 1548associationofbacterialcolonizationinulcerativelesionsofthediabeticfoottogetherwiththecicatrizationprocess
AT delunadavid 1548associationofbacterialcolonizationinulcerativelesionsofthediabeticfoottogetherwiththecicatrizationprocess
AT acevedonoemi 1548associationofbacterialcolonizationinulcerativelesionsofthediabeticfoottogetherwiththecicatrizationprocess