Cargando…
143. Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Ambulatory Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Viral Infections
BACKGROUND: Between 15–50% of patients seen in ambulatory settings are prescribed an antibiotic. At least one third of this usage is considered unnecessary. In 2019, our institution implemented the MITIGATE Toolkit, endorsed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to reduce inappropriate a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777875/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.188 |
_version_ | 1783631005373956096 |
---|---|
author | Escobar, Zahra Kassamali Bouchard, Todd Lansang, Jose Mari Thomassen, Scott Huang, Joanne Lynch, John B May, Larissa Kvak, Staci D’Angeli, Marisa A Bryson-Cahn, Chloe |
author_facet | Escobar, Zahra Kassamali Bouchard, Todd Lansang, Jose Mari Thomassen, Scott Huang, Joanne Lynch, John B May, Larissa Kvak, Staci D’Angeli, Marisa A Bryson-Cahn, Chloe |
author_sort | Escobar, Zahra Kassamali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Between 15–50% of patients seen in ambulatory settings are prescribed an antibiotic. At least one third of this usage is considered unnecessary. In 2019, our institution implemented the MITIGATE Toolkit, endorsed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral respiratory infections in emergency and urgent care settings. In February 2020 we identified our first hospitalized patient with SARS-CoV(2). In March, efforts to limit person-to-person contact led to shelter in place orders and substantial reorganization of our healthcare system. During this time we continued to track rates of unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. METHODS: This was a single center observational study. Electronic medical record data were accessed to determine antibiotic prescribing and diagnosis codes. We provided monthly individual feedback to urgent care prescribers, (Sep 2019-Mar 2020), primary care, and ED providers (Jan 2020 – Mar 2020) notifying them of their specific rate of unnecessary antibiotic prescribing and labeling them as a top performer or not a top performer compared to their peers. The primary outcome was rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. RESULTS: Pre toolkit intervention, 14,398 patient visits met MITIGATE inclusion criteria and 12% received an antibiotic unnecessarily in Jan-April 2019. Post-toolkit intervention, 12,328 patient visits met inclusion criteria and 7% received an antibiotic unnecessarily in Jan-April 2020. In April 2020, patient visits dropped to 10–50% of what they were in March 2020 and April 2019. During this time the unnecessary antibiotic prescribing rate doubled in urgent care to 7.8% from 3.6% the previous month and stayed stable in primary care and the ED at 3.2% and 11.8% respectively in April compared to 4.6% and 10.4% in the previous month. CONCLUSION: Rates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were reduced nearly in half from 2019 to 2020 across 3 ambulatory care settings. The increase in prescribing in April seen in urgent care and after providers stopped receiving their monthly feedback is concerning. Many factors may have contributed to this increase, but it raises concerns for increased inappropriate antibacterial usage as a side effect of the SARS-CoV(2) pandemic. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7777875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77778752021-01-07 143. Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Ambulatory Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Viral Infections Escobar, Zahra Kassamali Bouchard, Todd Lansang, Jose Mari Thomassen, Scott Huang, Joanne Lynch, John B May, Larissa Kvak, Staci D’Angeli, Marisa A Bryson-Cahn, Chloe Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Between 15–50% of patients seen in ambulatory settings are prescribed an antibiotic. At least one third of this usage is considered unnecessary. In 2019, our institution implemented the MITIGATE Toolkit, endorsed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral respiratory infections in emergency and urgent care settings. In February 2020 we identified our first hospitalized patient with SARS-CoV(2). In March, efforts to limit person-to-person contact led to shelter in place orders and substantial reorganization of our healthcare system. During this time we continued to track rates of unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. METHODS: This was a single center observational study. Electronic medical record data were accessed to determine antibiotic prescribing and diagnosis codes. We provided monthly individual feedback to urgent care prescribers, (Sep 2019-Mar 2020), primary care, and ED providers (Jan 2020 – Mar 2020) notifying them of their specific rate of unnecessary antibiotic prescribing and labeling them as a top performer or not a top performer compared to their peers. The primary outcome was rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. RESULTS: Pre toolkit intervention, 14,398 patient visits met MITIGATE inclusion criteria and 12% received an antibiotic unnecessarily in Jan-April 2019. Post-toolkit intervention, 12,328 patient visits met inclusion criteria and 7% received an antibiotic unnecessarily in Jan-April 2020. In April 2020, patient visits dropped to 10–50% of what they were in March 2020 and April 2019. During this time the unnecessary antibiotic prescribing rate doubled in urgent care to 7.8% from 3.6% the previous month and stayed stable in primary care and the ED at 3.2% and 11.8% respectively in April compared to 4.6% and 10.4% in the previous month. CONCLUSION: Rates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were reduced nearly in half from 2019 to 2020 across 3 ambulatory care settings. The increase in prescribing in April seen in urgent care and after providers stopped receiving their monthly feedback is concerning. Many factors may have contributed to this increase, but it raises concerns for increased inappropriate antibacterial usage as a side effect of the SARS-CoV(2) pandemic. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777875/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.188 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Escobar, Zahra Kassamali Bouchard, Todd Lansang, Jose Mari Thomassen, Scott Huang, Joanne Lynch, John B May, Larissa Kvak, Staci D’Angeli, Marisa A Bryson-Cahn, Chloe 143. Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Ambulatory Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Viral Infections |
title | 143. Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Ambulatory Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Viral Infections |
title_full | 143. Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Ambulatory Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Viral Infections |
title_fullStr | 143. Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Ambulatory Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Viral Infections |
title_full_unstemmed | 143. Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Ambulatory Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Viral Infections |
title_short | 143. Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Ambulatory Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Viral Infections |
title_sort | 143. initial impact of covid-19 on ambulatory antibiotic prescribing for respiratory viral infections |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777875/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT escobarzahrakassamali 143initialimpactofcovid19onambulatoryantibioticprescribingforrespiratoryviralinfections AT bouchardtodd 143initialimpactofcovid19onambulatoryantibioticprescribingforrespiratoryviralinfections AT lansangjosemari 143initialimpactofcovid19onambulatoryantibioticprescribingforrespiratoryviralinfections AT thomassenscott 143initialimpactofcovid19onambulatoryantibioticprescribingforrespiratoryviralinfections AT huangjoanne 143initialimpactofcovid19onambulatoryantibioticprescribingforrespiratoryviralinfections AT lynchjohnb 143initialimpactofcovid19onambulatoryantibioticprescribingforrespiratoryviralinfections AT maylarissa 143initialimpactofcovid19onambulatoryantibioticprescribingforrespiratoryviralinfections AT kvakstaci 143initialimpactofcovid19onambulatoryantibioticprescribingforrespiratoryviralinfections AT dangelimarisaa 143initialimpactofcovid19onambulatoryantibioticprescribingforrespiratoryviralinfections AT brysoncahnchloe 143initialimpactofcovid19onambulatoryantibioticprescribingforrespiratoryviralinfections |