Cargando…
171. Effectiveness and Feasibility of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy De-Labeling Pilot Program
BACKGROUND: Prevalence of true hypersensitivity to penicillins is low (0.5–2%). Documented penicillin allergies have been associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, Clostridioides difficile infections, and surgical site in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777876/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.215 |
_version_ | 1783631005606739968 |
---|---|
author | Song, Youchan Nelson, Zachary Gens, Krista |
author_facet | Song, Youchan Nelson, Zachary Gens, Krista |
author_sort | Song, Youchan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prevalence of true hypersensitivity to penicillins is low (0.5–2%). Documented penicillin allergies have been associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, Clostridioides difficile infections, and surgical site infections. “De-labeling” of inappropriately documented allergies can decrease the use of unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics and prevent negative outcomes, but labor-intensive skin testing and oral challenges can be a barrier to program implementation. The goal of this project is to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labeling process that does not involve skin testing or oral challenges. METHODS: Adult patients with penicillin allergies were identified using a report within the electronic health record during a 3-month pilot period. Patients identified were interviewed by an infectious diseases pharmacy resident, and an allergy history was assessed utilizing a standardized checklist. The patients’ answers determined the ability to de-label via pharmacist utilization of an evidence-based and standardized checklist developed for this project. All documentation included a detailed patient allergy history along with a beta-lactam cross-reactivity chart to help guide future antibiotic choices. RESULTS: 66 patients were interviewed during the pilot. 12 patients (18%) met criteria for de-labeling and consented to the removal of the allergy. 4 patients (6%) met criteria for de-labeling but declined the removal of the allergy. Average time spent during patient interview was 5.2 minutes per patient. 58.3% of patients (7/12) who were de-labeled were subsequently prescribed a beta-lactam, and 100% (7/7) were able to tolerate the agents. 1 out of 4 patients (25%) who declined de-labeling but had their allergy updated to reflect intolerance was prescribed beta-lactams and was able to tolerate the agents (1/1, 100%). CONCLUSION: A pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labeling process utilizing a standardized checklist is an effective method for removing penicillin allergies in patients who do not have a true allergy to penicillins. This pharmacist-led process is a feasible method for sites unable to perform oral challenges or skin testing. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7777876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77778762021-01-07 171. Effectiveness and Feasibility of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy De-Labeling Pilot Program Song, Youchan Nelson, Zachary Gens, Krista Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Prevalence of true hypersensitivity to penicillins is low (0.5–2%). Documented penicillin allergies have been associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, Clostridioides difficile infections, and surgical site infections. “De-labeling” of inappropriately documented allergies can decrease the use of unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics and prevent negative outcomes, but labor-intensive skin testing and oral challenges can be a barrier to program implementation. The goal of this project is to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labeling process that does not involve skin testing or oral challenges. METHODS: Adult patients with penicillin allergies were identified using a report within the electronic health record during a 3-month pilot period. Patients identified were interviewed by an infectious diseases pharmacy resident, and an allergy history was assessed utilizing a standardized checklist. The patients’ answers determined the ability to de-label via pharmacist utilization of an evidence-based and standardized checklist developed for this project. All documentation included a detailed patient allergy history along with a beta-lactam cross-reactivity chart to help guide future antibiotic choices. RESULTS: 66 patients were interviewed during the pilot. 12 patients (18%) met criteria for de-labeling and consented to the removal of the allergy. 4 patients (6%) met criteria for de-labeling but declined the removal of the allergy. Average time spent during patient interview was 5.2 minutes per patient. 58.3% of patients (7/12) who were de-labeled were subsequently prescribed a beta-lactam, and 100% (7/7) were able to tolerate the agents. 1 out of 4 patients (25%) who declined de-labeling but had their allergy updated to reflect intolerance was prescribed beta-lactams and was able to tolerate the agents (1/1, 100%). CONCLUSION: A pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labeling process utilizing a standardized checklist is an effective method for removing penicillin allergies in patients who do not have a true allergy to penicillins. This pharmacist-led process is a feasible method for sites unable to perform oral challenges or skin testing. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777876/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.215 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Song, Youchan Nelson, Zachary Gens, Krista 171. Effectiveness and Feasibility of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy De-Labeling Pilot Program |
title | 171. Effectiveness and Feasibility of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy De-Labeling Pilot Program |
title_full | 171. Effectiveness and Feasibility of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy De-Labeling Pilot Program |
title_fullStr | 171. Effectiveness and Feasibility of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy De-Labeling Pilot Program |
title_full_unstemmed | 171. Effectiveness and Feasibility of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy De-Labeling Pilot Program |
title_short | 171. Effectiveness and Feasibility of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy De-Labeling Pilot Program |
title_sort | 171. effectiveness and feasibility of pharmacist-driven penicillin allergy de-labeling pilot program |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777876/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songyouchan 171effectivenessandfeasibilityofpharmacistdrivenpenicillinallergydelabelingpilotprogram AT nelsonzachary 171effectivenessandfeasibilityofpharmacistdrivenpenicillinallergydelabelingpilotprogram AT genskrista 171effectivenessandfeasibilityofpharmacistdrivenpenicillinallergydelabelingpilotprogram |