Cargando…

142. Frequency of Short-course Empiric Antibiotic Use as an Antimicrobial Stewardship Metric

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship metrics that provide actionable guidance are needed to support efforts to improve hospital use of antibiotics. Antibiotics such as vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam are common empiric agents used frequently when the infectious process remains unknown. Thus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGregor, Jessina C, McCracken, Caitlin M, Hohmann, Samuel F, Pakyz, Amy L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777923/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.452
_version_ 1783631016805531648
author McGregor, Jessina C
McCracken, Caitlin M
Hohmann, Samuel F
Pakyz, Amy L
author_facet McGregor, Jessina C
McCracken, Caitlin M
Hohmann, Samuel F
Pakyz, Amy L
author_sort McGregor, Jessina C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship metrics that provide actionable guidance are needed to support efforts to improve hospital use of antibiotics. Antibiotics such as vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam are common empiric agents used frequently when the infectious process remains unknown. Thus short, incomplete courses of therapy are used more frequently for such agents. We aimed to evaluate the variability in short courses of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam use across U.S. hospitals. [Image: see text] METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study among U.S. hospitals that contributed inpatient pharmacy data to the Vizient clinical database in 2016. We identified vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam courses initiated within the 48 hours of admission, measured as days of therapy received. We calculated the percent of patients that received 1, 2, 3, 4 or >4 days of therapy at each facility to describe short course empiric therapy use. To describe the variability across facilities, we then assessed the median, interquartile range (IQR), and total range of that percentage. RESULTS: We identified 145 hospitals representing approximately 3.7 million patient encounters for inclusion in this study. Within 48 hours of admission, 13.9% of encounters received vancomycin, 7.7% piperacillin/tazobactam, and 4.6% received both. The figure demonstrates the variability in the frequency of short course antibiotic use across hospitals; boxes indicate the IQR with the transecting line representing the median and whiskers representing the full range. The proportion of patients that received one day of therapy varied most across hospitals, with vancomycin ranging from 0–100%. In contrast, the frequency of patients that received greater than four days of therapy varied considerably less across hospitals; 0–33% for vancomycin. CONCLUSION: The variability in use of short course empiric therapies suggests that use for non-infectious processes or infections not appropriately treated by these agents varies greatly across facilities. Measuring short course use for common empiric agents may serve as an important antimicrobial stewardship metric. Such a metric could inform antimicrobial stewardship efforts to reduce unnecessary initiation of empiric antimicrobial therapy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77779232021-01-07 142. Frequency of Short-course Empiric Antibiotic Use as an Antimicrobial Stewardship Metric McGregor, Jessina C McCracken, Caitlin M Hohmann, Samuel F Pakyz, Amy L Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship metrics that provide actionable guidance are needed to support efforts to improve hospital use of antibiotics. Antibiotics such as vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam are common empiric agents used frequently when the infectious process remains unknown. Thus short, incomplete courses of therapy are used more frequently for such agents. We aimed to evaluate the variability in short courses of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam use across U.S. hospitals. [Image: see text] METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study among U.S. hospitals that contributed inpatient pharmacy data to the Vizient clinical database in 2016. We identified vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam courses initiated within the 48 hours of admission, measured as days of therapy received. We calculated the percent of patients that received 1, 2, 3, 4 or >4 days of therapy at each facility to describe short course empiric therapy use. To describe the variability across facilities, we then assessed the median, interquartile range (IQR), and total range of that percentage. RESULTS: We identified 145 hospitals representing approximately 3.7 million patient encounters for inclusion in this study. Within 48 hours of admission, 13.9% of encounters received vancomycin, 7.7% piperacillin/tazobactam, and 4.6% received both. The figure demonstrates the variability in the frequency of short course antibiotic use across hospitals; boxes indicate the IQR with the transecting line representing the median and whiskers representing the full range. The proportion of patients that received one day of therapy varied most across hospitals, with vancomycin ranging from 0–100%. In contrast, the frequency of patients that received greater than four days of therapy varied considerably less across hospitals; 0–33% for vancomycin. CONCLUSION: The variability in use of short course empiric therapies suggests that use for non-infectious processes or infections not appropriately treated by these agents varies greatly across facilities. Measuring short course use for common empiric agents may serve as an important antimicrobial stewardship metric. Such a metric could inform antimicrobial stewardship efforts to reduce unnecessary initiation of empiric antimicrobial therapy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777923/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.452 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
McGregor, Jessina C
McCracken, Caitlin M
Hohmann, Samuel F
Pakyz, Amy L
142. Frequency of Short-course Empiric Antibiotic Use as an Antimicrobial Stewardship Metric
title 142. Frequency of Short-course Empiric Antibiotic Use as an Antimicrobial Stewardship Metric
title_full 142. Frequency of Short-course Empiric Antibiotic Use as an Antimicrobial Stewardship Metric
title_fullStr 142. Frequency of Short-course Empiric Antibiotic Use as an Antimicrobial Stewardship Metric
title_full_unstemmed 142. Frequency of Short-course Empiric Antibiotic Use as an Antimicrobial Stewardship Metric
title_short 142. Frequency of Short-course Empiric Antibiotic Use as an Antimicrobial Stewardship Metric
title_sort 142. frequency of short-course empiric antibiotic use as an antimicrobial stewardship metric
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777923/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.452
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgregorjessinac 142frequencyofshortcourseempiricantibioticuseasanantimicrobialstewardshipmetric
AT mccrackencaitlinm 142frequencyofshortcourseempiricantibioticuseasanantimicrobialstewardshipmetric
AT hohmannsamuelf 142frequencyofshortcourseempiricantibioticuseasanantimicrobialstewardshipmetric
AT pakyzamyl 142frequencyofshortcourseempiricantibioticuseasanantimicrobialstewardshipmetric