Cargando…

1680. Evaluation of the Urinalysis Reflex to Culture Sensitivity and Impact on Antibiotic Utilization

BACKGROUND: In June of 2016 at ChristianaCare a urinalysis with reflex to culture (UARC) order set was made available, which allows for urine cultures to be performed automatically if pre-defined criteria for a positive urinalysis are met. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wellen, Jacob, Harrington, Nicole, Leri, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777961/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1858
_version_ 1783631025933385728
author Wellen, Jacob
Harrington, Nicole
Leri, Jessica
author_facet Wellen, Jacob
Harrington, Nicole
Leri, Jessica
author_sort Wellen, Jacob
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In June of 2016 at ChristianaCare a urinalysis with reflex to culture (UARC) order set was made available, which allows for urine cultures to be performed automatically if pre-defined criteria for a positive urinalysis are met. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of the UARC as it relates to identifying a symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI), as well as to describe the impact of UARC on antibiotic utilization. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients aged 18 to 89 ordered a UARC. Patients were excluded if they were currently pregnant, had an absolute neutrophil count of < 100 cells/mm(3), were undergoing a urological procedure, or receiving antibiotics for another indication. The primary outcome of this study was to determine the utility of the UARC in identifying a symptomatic UTI, as determined by the Youden index. Secondary outcomes evaluated included mean days antibiotics and length of stay, adherence to duration of treatment guidelines, 30 day post discharge readmissions, 30 day post discharge mortality, and new Clostridioides difficile infection within 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were included in this study. A Youden index of 7.2% was calculated for the primary outcome. Patients with a positive UARC and UTI symptoms received an average of 7.54 days of antibiotics. Asymptomatic patients with a positive UARC received significantly more antibiotics than those with a negative UARC (3.05 vs 0 days, respectively,p=0.02). Adherence to duration of treatment guidelines was found to be 77.8%, 66.7%, and 50% for uncomplicated cystitis, complicated cystitis and pyelonephritis respectively. No difference was observed between groups for length of stay, 30 day post discharge readmissions, and 30 day post discharge mortality. No cases of new C. difficile infection were identified. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the UARC does not have utility as a diagnostic test for predicting a symptomatic UTI. The presence of a positive UARC in the absence of symptoms attributable to a UTI resulted in inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics. Further evaluation of how a UARC is ordered, perhaps requiring prescribers to document urinary symptoms, in addition to caregiver education is warranted DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77779612021-01-07 1680. Evaluation of the Urinalysis Reflex to Culture Sensitivity and Impact on Antibiotic Utilization Wellen, Jacob Harrington, Nicole Leri, Jessica Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: In June of 2016 at ChristianaCare a urinalysis with reflex to culture (UARC) order set was made available, which allows for urine cultures to be performed automatically if pre-defined criteria for a positive urinalysis are met. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of the UARC as it relates to identifying a symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI), as well as to describe the impact of UARC on antibiotic utilization. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients aged 18 to 89 ordered a UARC. Patients were excluded if they were currently pregnant, had an absolute neutrophil count of < 100 cells/mm(3), were undergoing a urological procedure, or receiving antibiotics for another indication. The primary outcome of this study was to determine the utility of the UARC in identifying a symptomatic UTI, as determined by the Youden index. Secondary outcomes evaluated included mean days antibiotics and length of stay, adherence to duration of treatment guidelines, 30 day post discharge readmissions, 30 day post discharge mortality, and new Clostridioides difficile infection within 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were included in this study. A Youden index of 7.2% was calculated for the primary outcome. Patients with a positive UARC and UTI symptoms received an average of 7.54 days of antibiotics. Asymptomatic patients with a positive UARC received significantly more antibiotics than those with a negative UARC (3.05 vs 0 days, respectively,p=0.02). Adherence to duration of treatment guidelines was found to be 77.8%, 66.7%, and 50% for uncomplicated cystitis, complicated cystitis and pyelonephritis respectively. No difference was observed between groups for length of stay, 30 day post discharge readmissions, and 30 day post discharge mortality. No cases of new C. difficile infection were identified. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the UARC does not have utility as a diagnostic test for predicting a symptomatic UTI. The presence of a positive UARC in the absence of symptoms attributable to a UTI resulted in inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics. Further evaluation of how a UARC is ordered, perhaps requiring prescribers to document urinary symptoms, in addition to caregiver education is warranted DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777961/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1858 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Wellen, Jacob
Harrington, Nicole
Leri, Jessica
1680. Evaluation of the Urinalysis Reflex to Culture Sensitivity and Impact on Antibiotic Utilization
title 1680. Evaluation of the Urinalysis Reflex to Culture Sensitivity and Impact on Antibiotic Utilization
title_full 1680. Evaluation of the Urinalysis Reflex to Culture Sensitivity and Impact on Antibiotic Utilization
title_fullStr 1680. Evaluation of the Urinalysis Reflex to Culture Sensitivity and Impact on Antibiotic Utilization
title_full_unstemmed 1680. Evaluation of the Urinalysis Reflex to Culture Sensitivity and Impact on Antibiotic Utilization
title_short 1680. Evaluation of the Urinalysis Reflex to Culture Sensitivity and Impact on Antibiotic Utilization
title_sort 1680. evaluation of the urinalysis reflex to culture sensitivity and impact on antibiotic utilization
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777961/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1858
work_keys_str_mv AT wellenjacob 1680evaluationoftheurinalysisreflextoculturesensitivityandimpactonantibioticutilization
AT harringtonnicole 1680evaluationoftheurinalysisreflextoculturesensitivityandimpactonantibioticutilization
AT lerijessica 1680evaluationoftheurinalysisreflextoculturesensitivityandimpactonantibioticutilization