Cargando…
254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
BACKGROUND: AmpC beta-lactamase producing organisms are traditionally treated with carbapenem or fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Recent studies, however, describe similar clinical outcomes in patients that receive cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam. We sought to assess outcomes in patients with bloods...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778046/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.298 |
_version_ | 1783631046145736704 |
---|---|
author | Staicu, Mary L Baumeister, Tyler Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R |
author_facet | Staicu, Mary L Baumeister, Tyler Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R |
author_sort | Staicu, Mary L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: AmpC beta-lactamase producing organisms are traditionally treated with carbapenem or fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Recent studies, however, describe similar clinical outcomes in patients that receive cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam. We sought to assess outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections caused by AmpC-producing organisms that received beta-lactams compared non-beta-lactam therapy. METHODS: Data was obtained retrospectively from the electronic health record (EHR) from January 2012 to February 2020. The primary objective was 30-day mortality from the day of first positive blood cultures with Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., or Serratia spp. in patients who received non-beta-lactam therapy (carbapenem, fluoroquinolone, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) to those who received beta-lactam therapy (cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam). Secondary objectives included 30-day recurrence of bacteremia, pathogen isolated, source of bacteremia, hospital length of stay, and duration of antimicrobial therapy. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were included, 50 in the non-beta lactam group and 40 in the beta-lactam group. Demographics were similar between groups. Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in the beta-lactam group (20% vs 2%, p=0.009). Enterobacter spp. was the most frequently identified pathogen (67%), most commonly isolated from a urinary (31%) or intra-abdominal source (22%). The average duration of antibiotic therapy was significantly higher in the non-beta lactam group (18 vs 12 days, p=0.001). In contrast, there was no significant difference found in hospital length of stay, recurrence of bacteremia, pathogen isolated or source of bacteremia between groups. CONCLUSION: Beta-lactam therapy for the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by Amp-C producing organisms was associated with significantly greater 30-day mortality compared to patients that received non-beta-lactam therapy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7778046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77780462021-01-07 254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections Staicu, Mary L Baumeister, Tyler Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: AmpC beta-lactamase producing organisms are traditionally treated with carbapenem or fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Recent studies, however, describe similar clinical outcomes in patients that receive cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam. We sought to assess outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections caused by AmpC-producing organisms that received beta-lactams compared non-beta-lactam therapy. METHODS: Data was obtained retrospectively from the electronic health record (EHR) from January 2012 to February 2020. The primary objective was 30-day mortality from the day of first positive blood cultures with Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., or Serratia spp. in patients who received non-beta-lactam therapy (carbapenem, fluoroquinolone, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) to those who received beta-lactam therapy (cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam). Secondary objectives included 30-day recurrence of bacteremia, pathogen isolated, source of bacteremia, hospital length of stay, and duration of antimicrobial therapy. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were included, 50 in the non-beta lactam group and 40 in the beta-lactam group. Demographics were similar between groups. Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in the beta-lactam group (20% vs 2%, p=0.009). Enterobacter spp. was the most frequently identified pathogen (67%), most commonly isolated from a urinary (31%) or intra-abdominal source (22%). The average duration of antibiotic therapy was significantly higher in the non-beta lactam group (18 vs 12 days, p=0.001). In contrast, there was no significant difference found in hospital length of stay, recurrence of bacteremia, pathogen isolated or source of bacteremia between groups. CONCLUSION: Beta-lactam therapy for the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by Amp-C producing organisms was associated with significantly greater 30-day mortality compared to patients that received non-beta-lactam therapy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7778046/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.298 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Staicu, Mary L Baumeister, Tyler Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R 254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections |
title | 254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections |
title_full | 254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections |
title_fullStr | 254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections |
title_full_unstemmed | 254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections |
title_short | 254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections |
title_sort | 254. review of clinical outcomes in patients treated with beta-lactam vs non-beta-lactam therapy for ampc producing bacterial bloodstream infections |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778046/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.298 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT staicumaryl 254reviewofclinicaloutcomesinpatientstreatedwithbetalactamvsnonbetalactamtherapyforampcproducingbacterialbloodstreaminfections AT baumeistertyler 254reviewofclinicaloutcomesinpatientstreatedwithbetalactamvsnonbetalactamtherapyforampcproducingbacterialbloodstreaminfections AT laguiovilamaryroser 254reviewofclinicaloutcomesinpatientstreatedwithbetalactamvsnonbetalactamtherapyforampcproducingbacterialbloodstreaminfections |