Cargando…

254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections

BACKGROUND: AmpC beta-lactamase producing organisms are traditionally treated with carbapenem or fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Recent studies, however, describe similar clinical outcomes in patients that receive cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam. We sought to assess outcomes in patients with bloods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staicu, Mary L, Baumeister, Tyler, Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778046/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.298
_version_ 1783631046145736704
author Staicu, Mary L
Baumeister, Tyler
Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R
author_facet Staicu, Mary L
Baumeister, Tyler
Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R
author_sort Staicu, Mary L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: AmpC beta-lactamase producing organisms are traditionally treated with carbapenem or fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Recent studies, however, describe similar clinical outcomes in patients that receive cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam. We sought to assess outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections caused by AmpC-producing organisms that received beta-lactams compared non-beta-lactam therapy. METHODS: Data was obtained retrospectively from the electronic health record (EHR) from January 2012 to February 2020. The primary objective was 30-day mortality from the day of first positive blood cultures with Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., or Serratia spp. in patients who received non-beta-lactam therapy (carbapenem, fluoroquinolone, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) to those who received beta-lactam therapy (cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam). Secondary objectives included 30-day recurrence of bacteremia, pathogen isolated, source of bacteremia, hospital length of stay, and duration of antimicrobial therapy. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were included, 50 in the non-beta lactam group and 40 in the beta-lactam group. Demographics were similar between groups. Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in the beta-lactam group (20% vs 2%, p=0.009). Enterobacter spp. was the most frequently identified pathogen (67%), most commonly isolated from a urinary (31%) or intra-abdominal source (22%). The average duration of antibiotic therapy was significantly higher in the non-beta lactam group (18 vs 12 days, p=0.001). In contrast, there was no significant difference found in hospital length of stay, recurrence of bacteremia, pathogen isolated or source of bacteremia between groups. CONCLUSION: Beta-lactam therapy for the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by Amp-C producing organisms was associated with significantly greater 30-day mortality compared to patients that received non-beta-lactam therapy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7778046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77780462021-01-07 254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections Staicu, Mary L Baumeister, Tyler Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: AmpC beta-lactamase producing organisms are traditionally treated with carbapenem or fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Recent studies, however, describe similar clinical outcomes in patients that receive cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam. We sought to assess outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections caused by AmpC-producing organisms that received beta-lactams compared non-beta-lactam therapy. METHODS: Data was obtained retrospectively from the electronic health record (EHR) from January 2012 to February 2020. The primary objective was 30-day mortality from the day of first positive blood cultures with Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., or Serratia spp. in patients who received non-beta-lactam therapy (carbapenem, fluoroquinolone, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) to those who received beta-lactam therapy (cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam). Secondary objectives included 30-day recurrence of bacteremia, pathogen isolated, source of bacteremia, hospital length of stay, and duration of antimicrobial therapy. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were included, 50 in the non-beta lactam group and 40 in the beta-lactam group. Demographics were similar between groups. Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in the beta-lactam group (20% vs 2%, p=0.009). Enterobacter spp. was the most frequently identified pathogen (67%), most commonly isolated from a urinary (31%) or intra-abdominal source (22%). The average duration of antibiotic therapy was significantly higher in the non-beta lactam group (18 vs 12 days, p=0.001). In contrast, there was no significant difference found in hospital length of stay, recurrence of bacteremia, pathogen isolated or source of bacteremia between groups. CONCLUSION: Beta-lactam therapy for the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by Amp-C producing organisms was associated with significantly greater 30-day mortality compared to patients that received non-beta-lactam therapy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7778046/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.298 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Staicu, Mary L
Baumeister, Tyler
Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R
254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
title 254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
title_full 254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
title_fullStr 254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
title_full_unstemmed 254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
title_short 254. Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Beta-lactam vs Non-beta-lactam Therapy for AmpC Producing Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
title_sort 254. review of clinical outcomes in patients treated with beta-lactam vs non-beta-lactam therapy for ampc producing bacterial bloodstream infections
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778046/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.298
work_keys_str_mv AT staicumaryl 254reviewofclinicaloutcomesinpatientstreatedwithbetalactamvsnonbetalactamtherapyforampcproducingbacterialbloodstreaminfections
AT baumeistertyler 254reviewofclinicaloutcomesinpatientstreatedwithbetalactamvsnonbetalactamtherapyforampcproducingbacterialbloodstreaminfections
AT laguiovilamaryroser 254reviewofclinicaloutcomesinpatientstreatedwithbetalactamvsnonbetalactamtherapyforampcproducingbacterialbloodstreaminfections