Cargando…

270. Clinical Outcomes of Ceftriaxone versus Penicillin G for Complicated Viridans Group Streptococci Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: Viridans group streptococci (VGS) is an infrequent yet significant cause of bloodstream infections, and complicated cases may require prolonged antibiotic therapy. Ceftriaxone (CTX) and penicillin G (PCN G) are both considered first line options for VGS infections, but comparisons betwee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wo, Stephanie, Dubrovskaya, Yanina, Siegfried, Justin, Papadopoulos, John, Jen, Shin-Pung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778066/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.314
_version_ 1783631050642030592
author Wo, Stephanie
Dubrovskaya, Yanina
Siegfried, Justin
Papadopoulos, John
Jen, Shin-Pung
author_facet Wo, Stephanie
Dubrovskaya, Yanina
Siegfried, Justin
Papadopoulos, John
Jen, Shin-Pung
author_sort Wo, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Viridans group streptococci (VGS) is an infrequent yet significant cause of bloodstream infections, and complicated cases may require prolonged antibiotic therapy. Ceftriaxone (CTX) and penicillin G (PCN G) are both considered first line options for VGS infections, but comparisons between these agents are limited. We evaluated the clinical outcomes amongst patients treated with CTX and PCN G for complicated VGS bacteremia. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study of adult patients with ≥1 positive VGS blood culture who were treated with either CTX or PCN G/ampicillin (both included in PCN G arm) between January 2013 and June 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of safety endpoints, including hospital readmission due to VGS or an adverse event (AE) from therapy, Clostridioides difficile infections, treatment modification or discontinuation due to an antibiotic-related AE, and development of extended-spectrum beta lactamase resistance. Secondary outcomes included the individual safety endpoints, VGS bacteremia recurrence, hospital readmission, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of 328 patients screened for inclusion, 94 patients met eligibility criteria (CTX n= 64, PCN G n=34). Median age was 68 years (IQR 56–81) and 68% were male. Study patients did not present with critical illness, as reflected by a median Pitt bacteremia score of 0 in the CTX and 1 in the PCN G arms, P=0.764. Streptococcus mitis was the most common VGS isolate and infective endocarditis (IE) was the predominant source of infection. CTX was not significantly associated with increased risk of the primary outcome (14% vs. 27%; P= 0.139). The driver of the composite outcome was hospital readmission due to VGS bacteremia or therapy complications. Results were similar in the subgroup of patients with IE (12.5% vs. 23.5%). No secondary endpoints differed significantly between groups. On multivariate analysis, source removal was a protective factor of the primary outcome (OR 0.1; 95% CI 0.020–0.6771; P= 0.017). CONCLUSION: Despite potential safety concerns with the prolonged use of CTX in complicated VGS bacteremia, this study did not demonstrate a higher rate of treatment failure, adverse events, or resistance. These findings warrant further exploration. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7778066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77780662021-01-07 270. Clinical Outcomes of Ceftriaxone versus Penicillin G for Complicated Viridans Group Streptococci Bacteremia Wo, Stephanie Dubrovskaya, Yanina Siegfried, Justin Papadopoulos, John Jen, Shin-Pung Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Viridans group streptococci (VGS) is an infrequent yet significant cause of bloodstream infections, and complicated cases may require prolonged antibiotic therapy. Ceftriaxone (CTX) and penicillin G (PCN G) are both considered first line options for VGS infections, but comparisons between these agents are limited. We evaluated the clinical outcomes amongst patients treated with CTX and PCN G for complicated VGS bacteremia. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study of adult patients with ≥1 positive VGS blood culture who were treated with either CTX or PCN G/ampicillin (both included in PCN G arm) between January 2013 and June 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of safety endpoints, including hospital readmission due to VGS or an adverse event (AE) from therapy, Clostridioides difficile infections, treatment modification or discontinuation due to an antibiotic-related AE, and development of extended-spectrum beta lactamase resistance. Secondary outcomes included the individual safety endpoints, VGS bacteremia recurrence, hospital readmission, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of 328 patients screened for inclusion, 94 patients met eligibility criteria (CTX n= 64, PCN G n=34). Median age was 68 years (IQR 56–81) and 68% were male. Study patients did not present with critical illness, as reflected by a median Pitt bacteremia score of 0 in the CTX and 1 in the PCN G arms, P=0.764. Streptococcus mitis was the most common VGS isolate and infective endocarditis (IE) was the predominant source of infection. CTX was not significantly associated with increased risk of the primary outcome (14% vs. 27%; P= 0.139). The driver of the composite outcome was hospital readmission due to VGS bacteremia or therapy complications. Results were similar in the subgroup of patients with IE (12.5% vs. 23.5%). No secondary endpoints differed significantly between groups. On multivariate analysis, source removal was a protective factor of the primary outcome (OR 0.1; 95% CI 0.020–0.6771; P= 0.017). CONCLUSION: Despite potential safety concerns with the prolonged use of CTX in complicated VGS bacteremia, this study did not demonstrate a higher rate of treatment failure, adverse events, or resistance. These findings warrant further exploration. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7778066/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.314 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Wo, Stephanie
Dubrovskaya, Yanina
Siegfried, Justin
Papadopoulos, John
Jen, Shin-Pung
270. Clinical Outcomes of Ceftriaxone versus Penicillin G for Complicated Viridans Group Streptococci Bacteremia
title 270. Clinical Outcomes of Ceftriaxone versus Penicillin G for Complicated Viridans Group Streptococci Bacteremia
title_full 270. Clinical Outcomes of Ceftriaxone versus Penicillin G for Complicated Viridans Group Streptococci Bacteremia
title_fullStr 270. Clinical Outcomes of Ceftriaxone versus Penicillin G for Complicated Viridans Group Streptococci Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 270. Clinical Outcomes of Ceftriaxone versus Penicillin G for Complicated Viridans Group Streptococci Bacteremia
title_short 270. Clinical Outcomes of Ceftriaxone versus Penicillin G for Complicated Viridans Group Streptococci Bacteremia
title_sort 270. clinical outcomes of ceftriaxone versus penicillin g for complicated viridans group streptococci bacteremia
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778066/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.314
work_keys_str_mv AT wostephanie 270clinicaloutcomesofceftriaxoneversuspenicillingforcomplicatedviridansgroupstreptococcibacteremia
AT dubrovskayayanina 270clinicaloutcomesofceftriaxoneversuspenicillingforcomplicatedviridansgroupstreptococcibacteremia
AT siegfriedjustin 270clinicaloutcomesofceftriaxoneversuspenicillingforcomplicatedviridansgroupstreptococcibacteremia
AT papadopoulosjohn 270clinicaloutcomesofceftriaxoneversuspenicillingforcomplicatedviridansgroupstreptococcibacteremia
AT jenshinpung 270clinicaloutcomesofceftriaxoneversuspenicillingforcomplicatedviridansgroupstreptococcibacteremia