Cargando…

1560. Microbiology of Necrotizing Fasciitis and Implications on Antimicrobial Stewardship

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare but deadly soft tissue infection. Early diagnosis, antibiotics, and surgical management are critical in treatment. Current IDSA guidelines recommend broad empiric antibiotics (eg, vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam or a carbapenem). At our instituti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Glen, Kim, Brian, Jeng, Arthur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778111/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1740
_version_ 1783631061384691712
author Huang, Glen
Kim, Brian
Jeng, Arthur
author_facet Huang, Glen
Kim, Brian
Jeng, Arthur
author_sort Huang, Glen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare but deadly soft tissue infection. Early diagnosis, antibiotics, and surgical management are critical in treatment. Current IDSA guidelines recommend broad empiric antibiotics (eg, vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam or a carbapenem). At our institution, this invariably consists of empiric treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and resistant gram-negative organisms (eg, Pseudomonas aeruginosa), usually with piperacillin-tazobactam. Clindamycin is the common third agent used empirically; however, the literature supports use of clindamycin only in confirmed cases of Group A Streptococcus (GAS). With the increasing dangers of antibiotic resistance, use of such broad agents may not be necessary for NF. We evaluated the microbiology of NF and the implications on empiric antibiotic treatment. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of NF from January 2016 to May 2020. RESULTS: Twenty-five cases of NF in 22 patients were recorded. The median age was 54.5 (IQR 37-59.8) and 15 (60%) were male. On presentation, 24 (96%) met systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria with a median laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis score of 15 (IQR 9-31.3, n = 20). The median presenting white blood cell count was 17.5 x 103 cells/uL (IQR 13.5-25.2), median C-reactive protein was 321.6 mg/L (IQR 25.9-37.6) and median creatinine was 1.2 mg/dL (IQR 0.7-1.6). The most frequently isolated organisms were anaerobes (n=9, 36%) and Streptococci other than GAS (n = 9, 36%). GAS was isolated in 6 patients (24%) and S. aureus in 2 patients (8%). All cases of S. aureus were methicillin-susceptible. No Pseudomonas species (PsA) or extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) gram negative organisms were isolated. Three patients (12%) had no organisms isolated from surgical cultures. Seven patients (28%) had positive blood cultures. Of the empiric antibiotics used, 24 (96%) patients were exposed to clindamycin and an anti-pseudomonal antibiotic. CONCLUSION: Empiric treatment of PsA and ESBL organisms is not necessary in NF. This infection should be considered a priority target for antimicrobial stewardship to reduce prescribing of broad-spectrum antibiotics to empirically treat these organisms. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7778111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77781112021-01-07 1560. Microbiology of Necrotizing Fasciitis and Implications on Antimicrobial Stewardship Huang, Glen Kim, Brian Jeng, Arthur Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare but deadly soft tissue infection. Early diagnosis, antibiotics, and surgical management are critical in treatment. Current IDSA guidelines recommend broad empiric antibiotics (eg, vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam or a carbapenem). At our institution, this invariably consists of empiric treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and resistant gram-negative organisms (eg, Pseudomonas aeruginosa), usually with piperacillin-tazobactam. Clindamycin is the common third agent used empirically; however, the literature supports use of clindamycin only in confirmed cases of Group A Streptococcus (GAS). With the increasing dangers of antibiotic resistance, use of such broad agents may not be necessary for NF. We evaluated the microbiology of NF and the implications on empiric antibiotic treatment. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of NF from January 2016 to May 2020. RESULTS: Twenty-five cases of NF in 22 patients were recorded. The median age was 54.5 (IQR 37-59.8) and 15 (60%) were male. On presentation, 24 (96%) met systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria with a median laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis score of 15 (IQR 9-31.3, n = 20). The median presenting white blood cell count was 17.5 x 103 cells/uL (IQR 13.5-25.2), median C-reactive protein was 321.6 mg/L (IQR 25.9-37.6) and median creatinine was 1.2 mg/dL (IQR 0.7-1.6). The most frequently isolated organisms were anaerobes (n=9, 36%) and Streptococci other than GAS (n = 9, 36%). GAS was isolated in 6 patients (24%) and S. aureus in 2 patients (8%). All cases of S. aureus were methicillin-susceptible. No Pseudomonas species (PsA) or extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) gram negative organisms were isolated. Three patients (12%) had no organisms isolated from surgical cultures. Seven patients (28%) had positive blood cultures. Of the empiric antibiotics used, 24 (96%) patients were exposed to clindamycin and an anti-pseudomonal antibiotic. CONCLUSION: Empiric treatment of PsA and ESBL organisms is not necessary in NF. This infection should be considered a priority target for antimicrobial stewardship to reduce prescribing of broad-spectrum antibiotics to empirically treat these organisms. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7778111/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1740 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Huang, Glen
Kim, Brian
Jeng, Arthur
1560. Microbiology of Necrotizing Fasciitis and Implications on Antimicrobial Stewardship
title 1560. Microbiology of Necrotizing Fasciitis and Implications on Antimicrobial Stewardship
title_full 1560. Microbiology of Necrotizing Fasciitis and Implications on Antimicrobial Stewardship
title_fullStr 1560. Microbiology of Necrotizing Fasciitis and Implications on Antimicrobial Stewardship
title_full_unstemmed 1560. Microbiology of Necrotizing Fasciitis and Implications on Antimicrobial Stewardship
title_short 1560. Microbiology of Necrotizing Fasciitis and Implications on Antimicrobial Stewardship
title_sort 1560. microbiology of necrotizing fasciitis and implications on antimicrobial stewardship
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778111/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1740
work_keys_str_mv AT huangglen 1560microbiologyofnecrotizingfasciitisandimplicationsonantimicrobialstewardship
AT kimbrian 1560microbiologyofnecrotizingfasciitisandimplicationsonantimicrobialstewardship
AT jengarthur 1560microbiologyofnecrotizingfasciitisandimplicationsonantimicrobialstewardship