Cargando…

1603. Comparison of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam Activity Against P. aeruginosa: A Multicenter Evaluation

BACKGROUND: Recent data have shown high rates of resistance and co-resistance of P. aeruginosa (PsA) to traditional first-line β-lactam antibiotics (piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, and meropenem), with < 45% susceptibility to the others when resistance to one agent is present, dri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moise, Pamela, DeRyke, C Andrew, Gonzalez, Marcela, Alekseeva, Irina, Lopez, Diego, Akrich, Brune, Sahm, Daniel F, Hackel, Meredith, Young, Katherine, Motyl, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778114/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1783
_version_ 1783631062097723392
author Moise, Pamela
DeRyke, C Andrew
Gonzalez, Marcela
Alekseeva, Irina
Lopez, Diego
Akrich, Brune
Sahm, Daniel F
Hackel, Meredith
Young, Katherine
Motyl, Mary
author_facet Moise, Pamela
DeRyke, C Andrew
Gonzalez, Marcela
Alekseeva, Irina
Lopez, Diego
Akrich, Brune
Sahm, Daniel F
Hackel, Meredith
Young, Katherine
Motyl, Mary
author_sort Moise, Pamela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent data have shown high rates of resistance and co-resistance of P. aeruginosa (PsA) to traditional first-line β-lactam antibiotics (piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, and meropenem), with < 45% susceptibility to the others when resistance to one agent is present, driving a large medical need for newer agents. We compared the in vitro activity of newer Gram-negative antibiotics ceftolozane/tazobactam (CT), ceftazidime/avibactam (CA), and meropenem/vaborbactam (MV) against a global collection of PsA isolates. METHODS: Data were collected from multiple US hospitals as part of the SMART Surveillance Program (2019). Susceptibility testing (MIC, mg/L) was performed by broth microdilution, with susceptibility determined by CLSI breakpoints except for MV where EUCAST breakpoints were applied due to CLSI offering no susceptibility breakpoint criteria. RESULTS: 865 clinical P. aeruginosa isolates (one unique initial isolate per patient) were submitted from 21 US medical centers in 2019. 32% were from ICU patients; 71% were from lower respiratory tract infections. The phenotypic β-lactam susceptibility profile in this population was piperacillin/tazobactam (79%), ceftazidime (82%), cefepime (83%), and meropenem (78%). The table provides the comparative susceptibility rates. Co-resistance between commonly prescribed first line β-lactam antibiotics was common. CT, CA and MV were more active than traditional β-lactams, with CT having higher in vitro activity regardless of phenotype, followed by CA and then MV. Table. Probability of Coverage for P. aeruginosa when Non-Susceptibility or Resistance to a Given First Line β-lactam Antibiotic [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest multicenter head to head comparison of the activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam among P. aeruginosa with varying resistant phenotypes. Among the newer agents, ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated the most reliable in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa with resistance to traditional first-line β-lactams. Further studies are needed to translate the potential clinical relevance of these findings in different practice settings with varying rates of antimicrobial resistance among P. aeruginosa. DISCLOSURES: Pamela Moise, PharmD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) C. Andrew DeRyke, PharmD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Marcela Gonzalez, MD, MSD (Employee, Shareholder) Irina Alekseeva, MD, PhD, MSD (Employee, Shareholder) Diego Lopez, MD, MSD (Employee, Shareholder) Brune Akrich, MD, MSD (Employee, Shareholder) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant)Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Independent Contractor) Katherine Young, MS, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Mary Motyl, PhD, Merck & Co, Inc (Employee, Shareholder)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7778114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77781142021-01-07 1603. Comparison of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam Activity Against P. aeruginosa: A Multicenter Evaluation Moise, Pamela DeRyke, C Andrew Gonzalez, Marcela Alekseeva, Irina Lopez, Diego Akrich, Brune Sahm, Daniel F Hackel, Meredith Young, Katherine Motyl, Mary Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Recent data have shown high rates of resistance and co-resistance of P. aeruginosa (PsA) to traditional first-line β-lactam antibiotics (piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, and meropenem), with < 45% susceptibility to the others when resistance to one agent is present, driving a large medical need for newer agents. We compared the in vitro activity of newer Gram-negative antibiotics ceftolozane/tazobactam (CT), ceftazidime/avibactam (CA), and meropenem/vaborbactam (MV) against a global collection of PsA isolates. METHODS: Data were collected from multiple US hospitals as part of the SMART Surveillance Program (2019). Susceptibility testing (MIC, mg/L) was performed by broth microdilution, with susceptibility determined by CLSI breakpoints except for MV where EUCAST breakpoints were applied due to CLSI offering no susceptibility breakpoint criteria. RESULTS: 865 clinical P. aeruginosa isolates (one unique initial isolate per patient) were submitted from 21 US medical centers in 2019. 32% were from ICU patients; 71% were from lower respiratory tract infections. The phenotypic β-lactam susceptibility profile in this population was piperacillin/tazobactam (79%), ceftazidime (82%), cefepime (83%), and meropenem (78%). The table provides the comparative susceptibility rates. Co-resistance between commonly prescribed first line β-lactam antibiotics was common. CT, CA and MV were more active than traditional β-lactams, with CT having higher in vitro activity regardless of phenotype, followed by CA and then MV. Table. Probability of Coverage for P. aeruginosa when Non-Susceptibility or Resistance to a Given First Line β-lactam Antibiotic [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest multicenter head to head comparison of the activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam among P. aeruginosa with varying resistant phenotypes. Among the newer agents, ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated the most reliable in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa with resistance to traditional first-line β-lactams. Further studies are needed to translate the potential clinical relevance of these findings in different practice settings with varying rates of antimicrobial resistance among P. aeruginosa. DISCLOSURES: Pamela Moise, PharmD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) C. Andrew DeRyke, PharmD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Marcela Gonzalez, MD, MSD (Employee, Shareholder) Irina Alekseeva, MD, PhD, MSD (Employee, Shareholder) Diego Lopez, MD, MSD (Employee, Shareholder) Brune Akrich, MD, MSD (Employee, Shareholder) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant)Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Independent Contractor) Katherine Young, MS, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Mary Motyl, PhD, Merck & Co, Inc (Employee, Shareholder) Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7778114/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1783 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Moise, Pamela
DeRyke, C Andrew
Gonzalez, Marcela
Alekseeva, Irina
Lopez, Diego
Akrich, Brune
Sahm, Daniel F
Hackel, Meredith
Young, Katherine
Motyl, Mary
1603. Comparison of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam Activity Against P. aeruginosa: A Multicenter Evaluation
title 1603. Comparison of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam Activity Against P. aeruginosa: A Multicenter Evaluation
title_full 1603. Comparison of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam Activity Against P. aeruginosa: A Multicenter Evaluation
title_fullStr 1603. Comparison of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam Activity Against P. aeruginosa: A Multicenter Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed 1603. Comparison of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam Activity Against P. aeruginosa: A Multicenter Evaluation
title_short 1603. Comparison of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam Activity Against P. aeruginosa: A Multicenter Evaluation
title_sort 1603. comparison of ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam activity against p. aeruginosa: a multicenter evaluation
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778114/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1783
work_keys_str_mv AT moisepamela 1603comparisonofceftolozanetazobactamceftazidimeavibactamandmeropenemvaborbactamactivityagainstpaeruginosaamulticenterevaluation
AT derykecandrew 1603comparisonofceftolozanetazobactamceftazidimeavibactamandmeropenemvaborbactamactivityagainstpaeruginosaamulticenterevaluation
AT gonzalezmarcela 1603comparisonofceftolozanetazobactamceftazidimeavibactamandmeropenemvaborbactamactivityagainstpaeruginosaamulticenterevaluation
AT alekseevairina 1603comparisonofceftolozanetazobactamceftazidimeavibactamandmeropenemvaborbactamactivityagainstpaeruginosaamulticenterevaluation
AT lopezdiego 1603comparisonofceftolozanetazobactamceftazidimeavibactamandmeropenemvaborbactamactivityagainstpaeruginosaamulticenterevaluation
AT akrichbrune 1603comparisonofceftolozanetazobactamceftazidimeavibactamandmeropenemvaborbactamactivityagainstpaeruginosaamulticenterevaluation
AT sahmdanielf 1603comparisonofceftolozanetazobactamceftazidimeavibactamandmeropenemvaborbactamactivityagainstpaeruginosaamulticenterevaluation
AT hackelmeredith 1603comparisonofceftolozanetazobactamceftazidimeavibactamandmeropenemvaborbactamactivityagainstpaeruginosaamulticenterevaluation
AT youngkatherine 1603comparisonofceftolozanetazobactamceftazidimeavibactamandmeropenemvaborbactamactivityagainstpaeruginosaamulticenterevaluation
AT motylmary 1603comparisonofceftolozanetazobactamceftazidimeavibactamandmeropenemvaborbactamactivityagainstpaeruginosaamulticenterevaluation