Cargando…

140. Impact of Pharmacist-led Audit & Feedback on Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for UTIs and SSTIs

BACKGROUND: An estimated 30% of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in the U.S. are unnecessary. Effective January 2020, The Joint Commission has implemented new core elements of performance requiring antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) to expand to outpatient practice settings. The purpose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Patricia, Benzer, Jessica, Coon, Joel, Egwuatu, Nnaemeka, Dumkow, Lisa E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778173/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.185
_version_ 1783631075197583360
author Choi, Patricia
Benzer, Jessica
Coon, Joel
Egwuatu, Nnaemeka
Dumkow, Lisa E
author_facet Choi, Patricia
Benzer, Jessica
Coon, Joel
Egwuatu, Nnaemeka
Dumkow, Lisa E
author_sort Choi, Patricia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An estimated 30% of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in the U.S. are unnecessary. Effective January 2020, The Joint Commission has implemented new core elements of performance requiring antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) to expand to outpatient practice settings. The purpose of this study was to determine whether pharmacist-led audit-and-feedback would improve antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract infections (UTI) and skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) at two primary care practices. METHODS: This retrospective, quasi-experimental study was conducted evaluating patients treated for UTI and SSTI at two outpatient primary care offices, one Family Medicine and the other Internal Medicine. The primary objective was to compare rates of total appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing before (Pre-ASP) versus after (Post-ASP) implementing a pharmacist-led audit-and-feedback process reviewing antibiotics prescribed for UTIs and SSTIs. Total appropriateness was defined by appropriate antibiotic selection, dose, duration, and therapy indication in accordance with institutional outpatient empiric therapy antimicrobial guidelines. Secondary objectives included comparing patient outcomes, including infection-related re-visits and Clostridioides difficile infections between groups. RESULTS: A total of 400 patients were included in this study (Pre-ASP n=200, Post-ASP n=200) Total antibiotic appropriateness improved significantly from 27.5% to 50.5% after implementation of the audit-and-feedback process (p< 0.0001). Significant improvement was also seen for individual prescribing components including appropriate drug selection (94% vs. 98%, p=0.041), duration (57.5% vs.83.5%, p< 0.0001), and therapy indication (94% vs. 98%, p=0.041). There were no differences in patient outcomes between groups including adverse drug events, treatment failure, C.difficile infections, and infection-related re-visits or hospitalizations within 30 days. CONCLUSION: A pharmacist-led audit-and-feedback outpatient stewardship strategy demonstrated significant improvement in outpatient antibiotic prescribing for UTI and SSTI. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7778173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77781732021-01-07 140. Impact of Pharmacist-led Audit & Feedback on Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for UTIs and SSTIs Choi, Patricia Benzer, Jessica Coon, Joel Egwuatu, Nnaemeka Dumkow, Lisa E Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: An estimated 30% of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in the U.S. are unnecessary. Effective January 2020, The Joint Commission has implemented new core elements of performance requiring antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) to expand to outpatient practice settings. The purpose of this study was to determine whether pharmacist-led audit-and-feedback would improve antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract infections (UTI) and skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) at two primary care practices. METHODS: This retrospective, quasi-experimental study was conducted evaluating patients treated for UTI and SSTI at two outpatient primary care offices, one Family Medicine and the other Internal Medicine. The primary objective was to compare rates of total appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing before (Pre-ASP) versus after (Post-ASP) implementing a pharmacist-led audit-and-feedback process reviewing antibiotics prescribed for UTIs and SSTIs. Total appropriateness was defined by appropriate antibiotic selection, dose, duration, and therapy indication in accordance with institutional outpatient empiric therapy antimicrobial guidelines. Secondary objectives included comparing patient outcomes, including infection-related re-visits and Clostridioides difficile infections between groups. RESULTS: A total of 400 patients were included in this study (Pre-ASP n=200, Post-ASP n=200) Total antibiotic appropriateness improved significantly from 27.5% to 50.5% after implementation of the audit-and-feedback process (p< 0.0001). Significant improvement was also seen for individual prescribing components including appropriate drug selection (94% vs. 98%, p=0.041), duration (57.5% vs.83.5%, p< 0.0001), and therapy indication (94% vs. 98%, p=0.041). There were no differences in patient outcomes between groups including adverse drug events, treatment failure, C.difficile infections, and infection-related re-visits or hospitalizations within 30 days. CONCLUSION: A pharmacist-led audit-and-feedback outpatient stewardship strategy demonstrated significant improvement in outpatient antibiotic prescribing for UTI and SSTI. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7778173/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.185 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Choi, Patricia
Benzer, Jessica
Coon, Joel
Egwuatu, Nnaemeka
Dumkow, Lisa E
140. Impact of Pharmacist-led Audit & Feedback on Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for UTIs and SSTIs
title 140. Impact of Pharmacist-led Audit & Feedback on Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for UTIs and SSTIs
title_full 140. Impact of Pharmacist-led Audit & Feedback on Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for UTIs and SSTIs
title_fullStr 140. Impact of Pharmacist-led Audit & Feedback on Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for UTIs and SSTIs
title_full_unstemmed 140. Impact of Pharmacist-led Audit & Feedback on Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for UTIs and SSTIs
title_short 140. Impact of Pharmacist-led Audit & Feedback on Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for UTIs and SSTIs
title_sort 140. impact of pharmacist-led audit & feedback on outpatient antibiotic prescribing for utis and sstis
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778173/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.185
work_keys_str_mv AT choipatricia 140impactofpharmacistledauditfeedbackonoutpatientantibioticprescribingforutisandsstis
AT benzerjessica 140impactofpharmacistledauditfeedbackonoutpatientantibioticprescribingforutisandsstis
AT coonjoel 140impactofpharmacistledauditfeedbackonoutpatientantibioticprescribingforutisandsstis
AT egwuatunnaemeka 140impactofpharmacistledauditfeedbackonoutpatientantibioticprescribingforutisandsstis
AT dumkowlisae 140impactofpharmacistledauditfeedbackonoutpatientantibioticprescribingforutisandsstis