Cargando…

285. Evaluation of the ePlex® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panels for Gram-positive/Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts

BACKGROUND: Multiple methods used for blood culture identification create inconsistent to reporting of critical results. Study aim was to evaluate performance characteristics of the ePlex BCID panels compared to current standard of care (SOC) methods used in our lab. METHODS: Identification sensitiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Chapin, Kimberle, Tansarli, Giannoula
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:	Poster Abstracts
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778225/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.329

Ejemplares similares

A Closer Look at the Laboratory Impact of Utilizing ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels: a Workflow Analysis Using Rapid Molecular Detection for Positive Blood Cultures
por: Tansarli, Giannoula S., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

1022. Evaluating the Impact of GenMark Dx ePlex® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) on Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections
por: Cumagun, Pia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

214. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Negative Panel
por: Meeder, Jeremy, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

2174. Comparison of the Verigene® and the ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Panels for Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections
por: Johnson, J Kristie, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

200. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Positive Panel
por: Meeder, Jeremy, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

668. Rapid Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Rod Bacteremia: Impact on Duration of Hospital Admission
por: Rogers, Ralph, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Test Performance and Potential Clinical Utility of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel
por: McCarty, T. P., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel
por: Carroll, Karen C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel
por: Wolk, Donna M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

653. Comparison of Yeasts identification by Biofire, Culture and ePlex for Quality Assurance purpose
por: lin, jeffrey, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

82. Assessment of Clinical Outcomes and Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns Following Implementation of the GenMark ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Panel for Gram-positive Bloodstream Infections
por: Wein, Megan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The impact of GenMark Dx ePlex blood-culture identification on the treatment and outcomes of gram-positive bacteremia
por: Kiszla, B. Matthew, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections
por: Huang, Te-Din, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

359. The Clinical Utility of the GenMark Dx ePlex® Fungal Blood Culture Identification Panel
por: Carmona, Stefania, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

164. Performance of ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Panels in Clinical Isolates and Characterization of Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities
por: Thomas, Jenni, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

1027. Earlier Is Better: Progress Toward Decreased Time to Optimal Therapy and Improved Antibiotic Stewardship for Gram-positive Bloodstream Infections Through Use of GenMark Dx ePlex system
por: White, Cameron, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evaluation of Microbiological Performance and the Potential Clinical Impact of the ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Panels for the Rapid Diagnosis of Bacteremia and Fungemia
por: Bryant, Sabrina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Response of Caenorhabditis elegans during subsequent infections with Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria
por: Mercy, Gnanasekaran Jeba, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Evaluation of point of care testing platform (ePLEX) for respiratory viral diagnosis
por: Guerendiain, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Multicenter Evaluation of the ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel for the Detection of Viral and Bacterial Respiratory Tract Pathogens in Nasopharyngeal Swabs
por: Babady, N. Esther, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Clinical implications of rapid ePlex® Respiratory Pathogen Panel testing compared to laboratory-developed real-time PCR
por: van Rijn, Anneloes L., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparison of ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel with Laboratory-Developed Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection of Respiratory Pathogens
por: Nijhuis, R. H. T., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluation of the Genmark ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels in detecting bacterial targets in lower respiratory tract specimens
por: van Asten, Suzanne A. V., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Resveratrol Reverts Tolerance and Restores Susceptibility to Chlorhexidine and Benzalkonium in Gram-Negative Bacteria, Gram-Positive Bacteria and Yeasts
por: Migliaccio, Antonella, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

An in‐house 45‐plex array for the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes in Gram‐positive bacteria
por: Kowalewicz, Carole, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

1368. The Clinical Impact of BioFire BCID2 Compared to BCID in a U.S. Pediatric Hospital
por: Graff, Kelly E, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Determination of MIC Distribution of Arbekacin, Cefminox, Fosfomycin, Biapenem and Other Antibiotics against Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates in South India: A Prospective Study
por: Rajenderan, Sangeetha, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Multiple Responses of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria to Mixture of Hydrocarbons
por: Marilena Lăzăroaie, Mihaela
Publicado: (2010)

Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma
por: Mai-Prochnow, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Activity of Specialized Biomolecules against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria
por: Tavares, Tânia D., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Parenteral colistin for the treatment of severe infections by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria
por: Grion, C, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Transferable resistance in multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria isolated from hemocultures in Slovakia
por: Kulkova, N, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

1355. Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria in the Pediatric Patient Population by Age and Sex
por: Malamet, Benjamin J, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Sonodynamic Excitation of Rose Bengal for Eradication of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria
por: Nakonechny, Faina, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Imipenem Resistance among Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria in Hospitalized Patients
por: Khorshidi, A, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Activity of siderophores against drug-resistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
por: Gokarn, Karuna, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Determining the Targets of Fluopsin C Action on Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria
por: Navarro, Miguel Octavio Pérez, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Antibacterial Activity of Colloidal Silver against Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria
por: Vila Domínguez, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A review on pilus assembly mechanisms in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
por: Shanmugasundarasamy, Tamilarasi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Positive and Negative Ions Potently Inhibit the Viability of Airborne Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria
por: Comini, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_p0one7cn455jfkfh1h1b322ar6