Cargando…

1632. Comparing the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of childhood tuberculosis through active and passive case finding

BACKGROUND: Childhood tuberculosis can be found via passive case finding (PCF), diagnosing a symptomatic child, and active case finding (ACF), discovering a child through contact tracing. Most high prevalence areas perform PCF, but as ACF is introduced, the clinical and radiologic findings may diffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ikeda, Saki, Cruz, Andrea T, Starke, Jeffrey R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778297/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1812
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Childhood tuberculosis can be found via passive case finding (PCF), diagnosing a symptomatic child, and active case finding (ACF), discovering a child through contact tracing. Most high prevalence areas perform PCF, but as ACF is introduced, the clinical and radiologic findings may differ. We compare clinical, radiographic, microbiologic and epidemiological characteristics of children diagnosed through PCF and ACF. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all patients diagnosed with TB from 01/01/2012-12/31/2019 at Texas Children’s Hospital. ACF is TB in a child who had not previously sought care before identified via contact tracing, immigration screening, or screening for incarceration. Severity of disease was based on location of illness, imaging and bacteriology/histopathology. Associations between PCF/ACF and demographics, disease severity, and microbiology were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 178 patients, 80 (45%) were diagnosed via ACF. ACF patients were more likely to be US-born (OR: 2.29, [95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.12-4.67]) and younger (mean 6.18 vs 8.84 years, p= 0.016). Only 2.5% of ACF patients had extrapulmonary disease, compared to 45% of the PCF group (p< 0.0001). All 14 severe extrathoracic cases were in the PCF group (10 central nervous system disease, 3 ocular disease, 1 spondylitis). Fewer patients in the ACF group had severe intrathoracic findings (11% vs 39%, p< 0.001): miliary disease (0% vs 10%, p=0.006), cavity (1% vs 9%, p=0.04), and multilobar involvement (7.5% vs 22.4%, p=0.006). ACF patients had more hilar/mediastinal adenopathy (OR: 2.51, [CI: 1.34-3.72], p=0.004). ACF patients were less often cultured (38% vs 89%, p< 0.0001) and had less microbiological confirmation by cultures or PCR (21% vs 52%, p=< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Patients in the ACF group were younger, had less severe clinical manifestations, and had almost no extrathoracic disease. Clinicians need to be aware that the common clinical and radiographic presentations in children differ between PCF and ACF. DISCLOSURES: Jeffrey R. Starke, MD, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals (Other Financial or Material Support, Member, Data Safety Monitoring Board)