Cargando…

1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections

BACKGROUND: Lipoglycopeptides are approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), but are often used in other infections, including osteomyelitis (OM) and bloodstream infections (BSI). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included VA St. Louis Health Care System patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Vanessa, Linneman, Travis W, Moenster, Ryan P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778315/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1733
_version_ 1783631106761818112
author Brown, Vanessa
Linneman, Travis W
Moenster, Ryan P
author_facet Brown, Vanessa
Linneman, Travis W
Moenster, Ryan P
author_sort Brown, Vanessa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lipoglycopeptides are approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), but are often used in other infections, including osteomyelitis (OM) and bloodstream infections (BSI). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included VA St. Louis Health Care System patients aged ≥18 through ≤89 years treated for ABSSSI, BSI, or OM with lipoglycopeptides. Patients were excluded if they received ≥72 hours (ABSSSI, BSI) or ≥7 days (OM) of antibiotics prior to lipoglycopeptide administration or other intravenous antibiotics were administered for ≥48 hours after lipoglycopeptide. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical success in the lipoglycopeptide cohort, defined per infection. Secondary outcomes were a comparison of clinical success in the lipoglycopeptide cohort to historical controls of patients treated at the VA St. Louis for ABSSSI, BSI, or OM. A multivariate regression was also conducted to find factors in the lipoglycopeptide group independently associated with clinical success. Safety outcomes compared adverse drug reactions between single- and 2-dose regimens of lipoglycopeptides. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were included in the analysis; no patients met inclusion for bloodstream infection. Twenty-nine patients were treated for ABSSSI and 7 patients met inclusion for OM treatment. Dalbavancin was the agent used most often for both OM (4/7) and ABSSSI (22/29). The primary outcome of clinical success occurred in 77.7% (28/36) of the lipoglycopeptide cohort. There was no difference in clinical success between the lipoglycopeptide cohort and historical controls for ABSSSI (86% [5/29] vs 84% [159/189], p >0.05) or OM (43% [3/7] vs 58% [83/143], p >0.05). No difference in adverse outcomes between single- and 2-dose regimens of lipoglycopeptide were observed. CONCLUSION: Clinical success for patients treated with lipoglycopeptides for ABSSSI and OM in this small cohort were comparable to historical controls. No difference was identified in the safety between single- and 2-dose regimens of lipoglycopeptides. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7778315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77783152021-01-07 1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections Brown, Vanessa Linneman, Travis W Moenster, Ryan P Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Lipoglycopeptides are approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), but are often used in other infections, including osteomyelitis (OM) and bloodstream infections (BSI). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included VA St. Louis Health Care System patients aged ≥18 through ≤89 years treated for ABSSSI, BSI, or OM with lipoglycopeptides. Patients were excluded if they received ≥72 hours (ABSSSI, BSI) or ≥7 days (OM) of antibiotics prior to lipoglycopeptide administration or other intravenous antibiotics were administered for ≥48 hours after lipoglycopeptide. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical success in the lipoglycopeptide cohort, defined per infection. Secondary outcomes were a comparison of clinical success in the lipoglycopeptide cohort to historical controls of patients treated at the VA St. Louis for ABSSSI, BSI, or OM. A multivariate regression was also conducted to find factors in the lipoglycopeptide group independently associated with clinical success. Safety outcomes compared adverse drug reactions between single- and 2-dose regimens of lipoglycopeptides. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were included in the analysis; no patients met inclusion for bloodstream infection. Twenty-nine patients were treated for ABSSSI and 7 patients met inclusion for OM treatment. Dalbavancin was the agent used most often for both OM (4/7) and ABSSSI (22/29). The primary outcome of clinical success occurred in 77.7% (28/36) of the lipoglycopeptide cohort. There was no difference in clinical success between the lipoglycopeptide cohort and historical controls for ABSSSI (86% [5/29] vs 84% [159/189], p >0.05) or OM (43% [3/7] vs 58% [83/143], p >0.05). No difference in adverse outcomes between single- and 2-dose regimens of lipoglycopeptide were observed. CONCLUSION: Clinical success for patients treated with lipoglycopeptides for ABSSSI and OM in this small cohort were comparable to historical controls. No difference was identified in the safety between single- and 2-dose regimens of lipoglycopeptides. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7778315/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1733 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Brown, Vanessa
Linneman, Travis W
Moenster, Ryan P
1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections
title 1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections
title_full 1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections
title_fullStr 1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections
title_full_unstemmed 1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections
title_short 1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections
title_sort 1553. efficacy and safety of dalbavancin and oritavancin in the treatment of gram-positive infections
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778315/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1733
work_keys_str_mv AT brownvanessa 1553efficacyandsafetyofdalbavancinandoritavancininthetreatmentofgrampositiveinfections
AT linnemantravisw 1553efficacyandsafetyofdalbavancinandoritavancininthetreatmentofgrampositiveinfections
AT moensterryanp 1553efficacyandsafetyofdalbavancinandoritavancininthetreatmentofgrampositiveinfections