Cargando…
1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections
BACKGROUND: Lipoglycopeptides are approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), but are often used in other infections, including osteomyelitis (OM) and bloodstream infections (BSI). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included VA St. Louis Health Care System patient...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778315/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1733 |
_version_ | 1783631106761818112 |
---|---|
author | Brown, Vanessa Linneman, Travis W Moenster, Ryan P |
author_facet | Brown, Vanessa Linneman, Travis W Moenster, Ryan P |
author_sort | Brown, Vanessa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lipoglycopeptides are approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), but are often used in other infections, including osteomyelitis (OM) and bloodstream infections (BSI). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included VA St. Louis Health Care System patients aged ≥18 through ≤89 years treated for ABSSSI, BSI, or OM with lipoglycopeptides. Patients were excluded if they received ≥72 hours (ABSSSI, BSI) or ≥7 days (OM) of antibiotics prior to lipoglycopeptide administration or other intravenous antibiotics were administered for ≥48 hours after lipoglycopeptide. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical success in the lipoglycopeptide cohort, defined per infection. Secondary outcomes were a comparison of clinical success in the lipoglycopeptide cohort to historical controls of patients treated at the VA St. Louis for ABSSSI, BSI, or OM. A multivariate regression was also conducted to find factors in the lipoglycopeptide group independently associated with clinical success. Safety outcomes compared adverse drug reactions between single- and 2-dose regimens of lipoglycopeptides. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were included in the analysis; no patients met inclusion for bloodstream infection. Twenty-nine patients were treated for ABSSSI and 7 patients met inclusion for OM treatment. Dalbavancin was the agent used most often for both OM (4/7) and ABSSSI (22/29). The primary outcome of clinical success occurred in 77.7% (28/36) of the lipoglycopeptide cohort. There was no difference in clinical success between the lipoglycopeptide cohort and historical controls for ABSSSI (86% [5/29] vs 84% [159/189], p >0.05) or OM (43% [3/7] vs 58% [83/143], p >0.05). No difference in adverse outcomes between single- and 2-dose regimens of lipoglycopeptide were observed. CONCLUSION: Clinical success for patients treated with lipoglycopeptides for ABSSSI and OM in this small cohort were comparable to historical controls. No difference was identified in the safety between single- and 2-dose regimens of lipoglycopeptides. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7778315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77783152021-01-07 1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections Brown, Vanessa Linneman, Travis W Moenster, Ryan P Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Lipoglycopeptides are approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), but are often used in other infections, including osteomyelitis (OM) and bloodstream infections (BSI). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included VA St. Louis Health Care System patients aged ≥18 through ≤89 years treated for ABSSSI, BSI, or OM with lipoglycopeptides. Patients were excluded if they received ≥72 hours (ABSSSI, BSI) or ≥7 days (OM) of antibiotics prior to lipoglycopeptide administration or other intravenous antibiotics were administered for ≥48 hours after lipoglycopeptide. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical success in the lipoglycopeptide cohort, defined per infection. Secondary outcomes were a comparison of clinical success in the lipoglycopeptide cohort to historical controls of patients treated at the VA St. Louis for ABSSSI, BSI, or OM. A multivariate regression was also conducted to find factors in the lipoglycopeptide group independently associated with clinical success. Safety outcomes compared adverse drug reactions between single- and 2-dose regimens of lipoglycopeptides. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were included in the analysis; no patients met inclusion for bloodstream infection. Twenty-nine patients were treated for ABSSSI and 7 patients met inclusion for OM treatment. Dalbavancin was the agent used most often for both OM (4/7) and ABSSSI (22/29). The primary outcome of clinical success occurred in 77.7% (28/36) of the lipoglycopeptide cohort. There was no difference in clinical success between the lipoglycopeptide cohort and historical controls for ABSSSI (86% [5/29] vs 84% [159/189], p >0.05) or OM (43% [3/7] vs 58% [83/143], p >0.05). No difference in adverse outcomes between single- and 2-dose regimens of lipoglycopeptide were observed. CONCLUSION: Clinical success for patients treated with lipoglycopeptides for ABSSSI and OM in this small cohort were comparable to historical controls. No difference was identified in the safety between single- and 2-dose regimens of lipoglycopeptides. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7778315/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1733 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Brown, Vanessa Linneman, Travis W Moenster, Ryan P 1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections |
title | 1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections |
title_full | 1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections |
title_fullStr | 1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections |
title_full_unstemmed | 1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections |
title_short | 1553. Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin and Oritavancin in the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections |
title_sort | 1553. efficacy and safety of dalbavancin and oritavancin in the treatment of gram-positive infections |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778315/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1733 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownvanessa 1553efficacyandsafetyofdalbavancinandoritavancininthetreatmentofgrampositiveinfections AT linnemantravisw 1553efficacyandsafetyofdalbavancinandoritavancininthetreatmentofgrampositiveinfections AT moensterryanp 1553efficacyandsafetyofdalbavancinandoritavancininthetreatmentofgrampositiveinfections |