Cargando…
Leadership, social determinants of health and health equity: the case of Costa Rica
Costa Rica has long been a country of special interest in the Americas and in global health because of its good health. The United Nations Development Programme ranks countries according to their level of human development based on life expectancy, education and national income. Although Costa Rica...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Organización Panamericana de la Salud
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33417651 http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.139 |
_version_ | 1783631132193980416 |
---|---|
author | Campbell Barr, Epsy Michael, Marmot |
author_facet | Campbell Barr, Epsy Michael, Marmot |
author_sort | Campbell Barr, Epsy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Costa Rica has long been a country of special interest in the Americas and in global health because of its good health. The United Nations Development Programme ranks countries according to their level of human development based on life expectancy, education and national income. Although Costa Rica is ranked at 63 and classified as ‘High’, in terms of health it belongs in the ‘Very High’ group. In 2018 mean life expectancy for the ‘Very High’ countries was 79.5, while in Costa Rica it was 80. In 2018, under five mortality was 8.8/1000 live births, lower than countries ranked in the ‘Very High’ human development group. Expected years of schooling in Costa Rica is 15.4, closer to the average, 16.4 years, of the ‘Very High’ human development group than the average of the ‘High’ group. The country is much healthier than would be predicted by its national income; rather, other features of society’s development are likely to have played a key role in the development of good health. These include (i) the decision to cease investment in national defence, which freed up money to invest in health, education and the welfare of the population; (ii) the decision to create a universal health system financed by the State, employers and workers in the 1940s; and (iii) the educational system, that generated opportunities to lift important sectors of the population out of poverty, allowing them to have basic sanitary conditions that increase their possibilities to live longer and in better conditions. Despite these advances, inequalities in terms of income and social conditions persist, presenting challenges in the field of health, particularly for lower-income populations and those of African and indigenous descent. These inequalities must be addressed using decisions based on scientific evidence, a greater use of disaggregated data to reveal progress in addressing these inequalities, and with a broader articulation of the health sector with policies that act on the social determinants of health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7778463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Organización Panamericana de la Salud |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77784632021-01-05 Leadership, social determinants of health and health equity: the case of Costa Rica Campbell Barr, Epsy Michael, Marmot Rev Panam Salud Publica Current Topic Costa Rica has long been a country of special interest in the Americas and in global health because of its good health. The United Nations Development Programme ranks countries according to their level of human development based on life expectancy, education and national income. Although Costa Rica is ranked at 63 and classified as ‘High’, in terms of health it belongs in the ‘Very High’ group. In 2018 mean life expectancy for the ‘Very High’ countries was 79.5, while in Costa Rica it was 80. In 2018, under five mortality was 8.8/1000 live births, lower than countries ranked in the ‘Very High’ human development group. Expected years of schooling in Costa Rica is 15.4, closer to the average, 16.4 years, of the ‘Very High’ human development group than the average of the ‘High’ group. The country is much healthier than would be predicted by its national income; rather, other features of society’s development are likely to have played a key role in the development of good health. These include (i) the decision to cease investment in national defence, which freed up money to invest in health, education and the welfare of the population; (ii) the decision to create a universal health system financed by the State, employers and workers in the 1940s; and (iii) the educational system, that generated opportunities to lift important sectors of the population out of poverty, allowing them to have basic sanitary conditions that increase their possibilities to live longer and in better conditions. Despite these advances, inequalities in terms of income and social conditions persist, presenting challenges in the field of health, particularly for lower-income populations and those of African and indigenous descent. These inequalities must be addressed using decisions based on scientific evidence, a greater use of disaggregated data to reveal progress in addressing these inequalities, and with a broader articulation of the health sector with policies that act on the social determinants of health. Organización Panamericana de la Salud 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7778463/ /pubmed/33417651 http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.139 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/legalcode This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 IGO License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. No modifications or commercial use of this article are permitted. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that PAHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the PAHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL. |
spellingShingle | Current Topic Campbell Barr, Epsy Michael, Marmot Leadership, social determinants of health and health equity: the case of Costa Rica |
title | Leadership, social determinants of health and health equity: the case of Costa Rica |
title_full | Leadership, social determinants of health and health equity: the case of Costa Rica |
title_fullStr | Leadership, social determinants of health and health equity: the case of Costa Rica |
title_full_unstemmed | Leadership, social determinants of health and health equity: the case of Costa Rica |
title_short | Leadership, social determinants of health and health equity: the case of Costa Rica |
title_sort | leadership, social determinants of health and health equity: the case of costa rica |
topic | Current Topic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33417651 http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campbellbarrepsy leadershipsocialdeterminantsofhealthandhealthequitythecaseofcostarica AT michaelmarmot leadershipsocialdeterminantsofhealthandhealthequitythecaseofcostarica |