Cargando…

Culture of SARS-CoV-2 in a panel of laboratory cell lines, permissivity, and differences in growth profile

The emergence of COVID-19 disease due to SARS-CoV-2 at the end of 2019 was rapidly associated with the isolation of the strain from co-culture onto VERO cells. These isolations quickly made it possible to carry out the first tests for antiviral agents’ susceptibility and drug repurposing. However, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wurtz, Nathalie, Penant, Gwilherm, Jardot, Priscilla, Duclos, Nathalie, La Scola, Bernard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33389257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04106-0
_version_ 1783631138304032768
author Wurtz, Nathalie
Penant, Gwilherm
Jardot, Priscilla
Duclos, Nathalie
La Scola, Bernard
author_facet Wurtz, Nathalie
Penant, Gwilherm
Jardot, Priscilla
Duclos, Nathalie
La Scola, Bernard
author_sort Wurtz, Nathalie
collection PubMed
description The emergence of COVID-19 disease due to SARS-CoV-2 at the end of 2019 was rapidly associated with the isolation of the strain from co-culture onto VERO cells. These isolations quickly made it possible to carry out the first tests for antiviral agents’ susceptibility and drug repurposing. However, it seems important to make an inventory of all the cells that can support the growth of this virus and evaluate possible differences between isolates. In the present work, we tested 4 strains of SARS-CoV-2 locally isolated on a panel of 34 cell lines present in our laboratory and commonly used for the isolation of human pathogenic microorganism. After inoculation, cells were observed for cytopathic effects and quantitative real-time polymerase reaction was used to measure the virus replication on the cells. We were able to obtain growth on 7 cell lines, 6 simian, and the human Caco-2. The cytopathogenic effects are variable, ranging from lysis of the cell monolayer in 48–72 h to no cytopathic effect in spite of intense multiplication, as in Caco-2 cells. Interestingly, effect and multiplication varied widely according to the strain tested. In this paper, we explored the species specificity and tissue tropism of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro on a panel of cells available in our laboratory and identified human and animal cell lines susceptible to support SARS-CoV-2 replication. Our work highlights the importance of testing multiple strains when testing antiviral molecules and performing patho-physiological analyzes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7778494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77784942021-01-04 Culture of SARS-CoV-2 in a panel of laboratory cell lines, permissivity, and differences in growth profile Wurtz, Nathalie Penant, Gwilherm Jardot, Priscilla Duclos, Nathalie La Scola, Bernard Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article The emergence of COVID-19 disease due to SARS-CoV-2 at the end of 2019 was rapidly associated with the isolation of the strain from co-culture onto VERO cells. These isolations quickly made it possible to carry out the first tests for antiviral agents’ susceptibility and drug repurposing. However, it seems important to make an inventory of all the cells that can support the growth of this virus and evaluate possible differences between isolates. In the present work, we tested 4 strains of SARS-CoV-2 locally isolated on a panel of 34 cell lines present in our laboratory and commonly used for the isolation of human pathogenic microorganism. After inoculation, cells were observed for cytopathic effects and quantitative real-time polymerase reaction was used to measure the virus replication on the cells. We were able to obtain growth on 7 cell lines, 6 simian, and the human Caco-2. The cytopathogenic effects are variable, ranging from lysis of the cell monolayer in 48–72 h to no cytopathic effect in spite of intense multiplication, as in Caco-2 cells. Interestingly, effect and multiplication varied widely according to the strain tested. In this paper, we explored the species specificity and tissue tropism of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro on a panel of cells available in our laboratory and identified human and animal cell lines susceptible to support SARS-CoV-2 replication. Our work highlights the importance of testing multiple strains when testing antiviral molecules and performing patho-physiological analyzes. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7778494/ /pubmed/33389257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04106-0 Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wurtz, Nathalie
Penant, Gwilherm
Jardot, Priscilla
Duclos, Nathalie
La Scola, Bernard
Culture of SARS-CoV-2 in a panel of laboratory cell lines, permissivity, and differences in growth profile
title Culture of SARS-CoV-2 in a panel of laboratory cell lines, permissivity, and differences in growth profile
title_full Culture of SARS-CoV-2 in a panel of laboratory cell lines, permissivity, and differences in growth profile
title_fullStr Culture of SARS-CoV-2 in a panel of laboratory cell lines, permissivity, and differences in growth profile
title_full_unstemmed Culture of SARS-CoV-2 in a panel of laboratory cell lines, permissivity, and differences in growth profile
title_short Culture of SARS-CoV-2 in a panel of laboratory cell lines, permissivity, and differences in growth profile
title_sort culture of sars-cov-2 in a panel of laboratory cell lines, permissivity, and differences in growth profile
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33389257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04106-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wurtznathalie cultureofsarscov2inapaneloflaboratorycelllinespermissivityanddifferencesingrowthprofile
AT penantgwilherm cultureofsarscov2inapaneloflaboratorycelllinespermissivityanddifferencesingrowthprofile
AT jardotpriscilla cultureofsarscov2inapaneloflaboratorycelllinespermissivityanddifferencesingrowthprofile
AT duclosnathalie cultureofsarscov2inapaneloflaboratorycelllinespermissivityanddifferencesingrowthprofile
AT lascolabernard cultureofsarscov2inapaneloflaboratorycelllinespermissivityanddifferencesingrowthprofile