Cargando…

In Vivo Evaluation of the Mechanical Strength of a Slide Lengthening Technique With a Locking Mechanism Using a Rabbit Model

Background There are many reports of Achilles tendon lengthening procedures for equinus deformity of the ankle. We previously modified an Achilles tendon lengthening to prevent overextension with a locking mechanism suture before performing a sliding lengthening. The purpose of this study was to com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iwase, Dai, Uchida, Kentaro, Metoki, Yukie, Sekiguchi, Hiroyuki, Aikawa, Jun, Matsuo, Takashi, Matsuo, Atsushi, Takaso, Masashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7779120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409106
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12387
_version_ 1783631268381982720
author Iwase, Dai
Uchida, Kentaro
Metoki, Yukie
Sekiguchi, Hiroyuki
Aikawa, Jun
Matsuo, Takashi
Matsuo, Atsushi
Takaso, Masashi
author_facet Iwase, Dai
Uchida, Kentaro
Metoki, Yukie
Sekiguchi, Hiroyuki
Aikawa, Jun
Matsuo, Takashi
Matsuo, Atsushi
Takaso, Masashi
author_sort Iwase, Dai
collection PubMed
description Background There are many reports of Achilles tendon lengthening procedures for equinus deformity of the ankle. We previously modified an Achilles tendon lengthening to prevent overextension with a locking mechanism suture before performing a sliding lengthening. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of the locking mechanism suture with sliding lengthening (L-SL) and Z-lengthening (ZL) using a rabbit model. Methods Thirty-six male Japanese white rabbits were assigned to two groups - half undergoing the L-SL technique and half undergoing the ZL technique on the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon. Six rabbits in each group were sacrificed at one week, three weeks, and six weeks postoperatively and evaluated, while five rabbits underwent radiographical and biomechanical evaluation and one underwent histological evaluation. Results In extension length, L-SL was significantly lower than ZL one week postoperatively. In the L-SL group, elongation one week postoperatively was significantly lower than that three and six weeks postoperatively. In the ultimate failure load, L-SL was significantly higher than ZL one and three weeks after lengthening. In the L-SL group, the ultimate failure load one week postoperatively was significantly lower than that three and six weeks postoperatively. In the ZL group, there were significant differences at all time points. Conclusion  L-SL had higher mechanical property in vivo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7779120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77791202021-01-05 In Vivo Evaluation of the Mechanical Strength of a Slide Lengthening Technique With a Locking Mechanism Using a Rabbit Model Iwase, Dai Uchida, Kentaro Metoki, Yukie Sekiguchi, Hiroyuki Aikawa, Jun Matsuo, Takashi Matsuo, Atsushi Takaso, Masashi Cureus Orthopedics Background There are many reports of Achilles tendon lengthening procedures for equinus deformity of the ankle. We previously modified an Achilles tendon lengthening to prevent overextension with a locking mechanism suture before performing a sliding lengthening. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of the locking mechanism suture with sliding lengthening (L-SL) and Z-lengthening (ZL) using a rabbit model. Methods Thirty-six male Japanese white rabbits were assigned to two groups - half undergoing the L-SL technique and half undergoing the ZL technique on the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon. Six rabbits in each group were sacrificed at one week, three weeks, and six weeks postoperatively and evaluated, while five rabbits underwent radiographical and biomechanical evaluation and one underwent histological evaluation. Results In extension length, L-SL was significantly lower than ZL one week postoperatively. In the L-SL group, elongation one week postoperatively was significantly lower than that three and six weeks postoperatively. In the ultimate failure load, L-SL was significantly higher than ZL one and three weeks after lengthening. In the L-SL group, the ultimate failure load one week postoperatively was significantly lower than that three and six weeks postoperatively. In the ZL group, there were significant differences at all time points. Conclusion  L-SL had higher mechanical property in vivo. Cureus 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7779120/ /pubmed/33409106 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12387 Text en Copyright © 2020, Iwase et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Iwase, Dai
Uchida, Kentaro
Metoki, Yukie
Sekiguchi, Hiroyuki
Aikawa, Jun
Matsuo, Takashi
Matsuo, Atsushi
Takaso, Masashi
In Vivo Evaluation of the Mechanical Strength of a Slide Lengthening Technique With a Locking Mechanism Using a Rabbit Model
title In Vivo Evaluation of the Mechanical Strength of a Slide Lengthening Technique With a Locking Mechanism Using a Rabbit Model
title_full In Vivo Evaluation of the Mechanical Strength of a Slide Lengthening Technique With a Locking Mechanism Using a Rabbit Model
title_fullStr In Vivo Evaluation of the Mechanical Strength of a Slide Lengthening Technique With a Locking Mechanism Using a Rabbit Model
title_full_unstemmed In Vivo Evaluation of the Mechanical Strength of a Slide Lengthening Technique With a Locking Mechanism Using a Rabbit Model
title_short In Vivo Evaluation of the Mechanical Strength of a Slide Lengthening Technique With a Locking Mechanism Using a Rabbit Model
title_sort in vivo evaluation of the mechanical strength of a slide lengthening technique with a locking mechanism using a rabbit model
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7779120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409106
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12387
work_keys_str_mv AT iwasedai invivoevaluationofthemechanicalstrengthofaslidelengtheningtechniquewithalockingmechanismusingarabbitmodel
AT uchidakentaro invivoevaluationofthemechanicalstrengthofaslidelengtheningtechniquewithalockingmechanismusingarabbitmodel
AT metokiyukie invivoevaluationofthemechanicalstrengthofaslidelengtheningtechniquewithalockingmechanismusingarabbitmodel
AT sekiguchihiroyuki invivoevaluationofthemechanicalstrengthofaslidelengtheningtechniquewithalockingmechanismusingarabbitmodel
AT aikawajun invivoevaluationofthemechanicalstrengthofaslidelengtheningtechniquewithalockingmechanismusingarabbitmodel
AT matsuotakashi invivoevaluationofthemechanicalstrengthofaslidelengtheningtechniquewithalockingmechanismusingarabbitmodel
AT matsuoatsushi invivoevaluationofthemechanicalstrengthofaslidelengtheningtechniquewithalockingmechanismusingarabbitmodel
AT takasomasashi invivoevaluationofthemechanicalstrengthofaslidelengtheningtechniquewithalockingmechanismusingarabbitmodel