Cargando…

Video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy might be a feasible alternative for surgically resectable pathological N2 non‐small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND: The majority of previous studies of the clinical outcome of video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus open lobectomy for pathological N2 non‐small cell lung cancer (pN2 NSCLC) have been single‐center experiences with small patient numbers. The aim of this study was therefore to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Jinbo, Li, Weimiao, Wang, Meng, Liu, Lunxu, Fu, Xiangning, Li, Yin, Xu, Lin, Liu, Yang, Zhao, Heng, Hu, Jian, Liu, Deruo, Shen, Jianfei, Yang, Haiying, Li, Xiaofei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7779187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33205914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13680
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The majority of previous studies of the clinical outcome of video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus open lobectomy for pathological N2 non‐small cell lung cancer (pN2 NSCLC) have been single‐center experiences with small patient numbers. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate these procedures but in a large cohort of Chinese patients with pathological N2 NSCLC in real‐world conditions. METHODS: Patients who underwent lobectomy for pN2 NSCLC by either VATS or thoracotomy were retrospectively reviewed from 10 tertiary hospitals between January 2014 and September 2017. Perioperative outcomes and overall survival of the patients were analyzed. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify potential prognostic factors. Propensity‐score analysis was performed to reduce cofounding biases and compare the clinical outcomes between both groups. RESULTS: Among 2144 pN2 NSCLC, 1244 patients were managed by VATS and 900 by open procedure. A total of 305 (24.5%) and 344 patients died during VATS and the thoracotomy group during a median follow‐up of 16.7 and 15.6 months, respectively. VATS lobectomy patients had better overall survival when compared with those undergoing the open procedure (P < 0.0001). Multivariate COX regression analysis showed VATS lobectomy independently favored overall survival (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.621–0.896, P = 0.0017). Better perioperative outcomes, including less blood loss, shorter drainage time and hospital stay, were also observed in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy (P < 0.05). After propensity‐score matching, 169 patients in each group were analyzed, and no survival difference were found between the two groups. Less blood loss was observed in the VATS group, but there was a longer operation time. CONCLUSIONS: VATS lobectomy might be a feasible alternative to conventional open surgery for resectable pN2 NSCLC. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study: VATS lobectomy has comparative OS in pN2 NSCLC versus open procedure in resectable patients. What this study adds: VATS lobectomy might be feasible for pN2 NSCLC.