Cargando…
Audit of Anesthetic Equipment in Veterinary Clinics in Spain and Portugal
The objective of this retrospective study was to review the results of a 4-year audit performed on anesthetic machines and vaporizers used in veterinary clinics in Spain and Portugal. Data was collected between July 2016 and April 2020. Inspections were carried out by a team of seven veterinarians,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7779558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.592597 |
_version_ | 1783631356796862464 |
---|---|
author | Redondo, Jose I. Domenech, Luis Mateu, Cristina Bañeres, Alfon Martínez, Amalia Lopes, Diana |
author_facet | Redondo, Jose I. Domenech, Luis Mateu, Cristina Bañeres, Alfon Martínez, Amalia Lopes, Diana |
author_sort | Redondo, Jose I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this retrospective study was to review the results of a 4-year audit performed on anesthetic machines and vaporizers used in veterinary clinics in Spain and Portugal. Data was collected between July 2016 and April 2020. Inspections were carried out by a team of seven veterinarians, using a human-modified system of checks that was adapted to a veterinary practice. The evaluation of each item was noted as “correct” or “incorrect”. The vaporizers' performance was evaluated using a self-calibrating gas analyzer. The vaporizer was classified as “correct” or “incorrect” when the vaporization error was less than or equal to, or more than 20%, respectively. The anesthetic machine was classified as “conforming” if all its components were noted as “correct” and no leaks were detected, or as “non-conforming” if any of the components was noted as “incorrect” or if a leak was detected. If the inspector was able to repair on-site the item malfunctions detected and the machine was fit for use, they issued a final report as “conforming.” On the contrary, if such malfunctions persisted, the final report was “non-conforming,” and a recommendation to remove the machine from service until its final repair was provided. To perform statistical analysis, each inspected item was used as predictor, classification and regression trees were built, and a random forest analysis was performed. A total of 2,001 anesthetic machines and 2,309 vaporizers were studied. After inspection, 42.7 and 26.4% of the machines were non-conforming and conforming, respectively, whereas 30.9% could be repaired in situ. A total of 27.1% of the isoflurane vaporizers and 35.9% of the sevoflurane vaporizers were incorrect. Machine learning techniques showed that the most important variables in the classification of the anesthetic machines as conforming or non-conforming were mostly the scavenger system and the canister, followed some way behind by the APL valve, source of oxygen, reservoir bag, vaporizer, and connections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7779558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77795582021-01-05 Audit of Anesthetic Equipment in Veterinary Clinics in Spain and Portugal Redondo, Jose I. Domenech, Luis Mateu, Cristina Bañeres, Alfon Martínez, Amalia Lopes, Diana Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science The objective of this retrospective study was to review the results of a 4-year audit performed on anesthetic machines and vaporizers used in veterinary clinics in Spain and Portugal. Data was collected between July 2016 and April 2020. Inspections were carried out by a team of seven veterinarians, using a human-modified system of checks that was adapted to a veterinary practice. The evaluation of each item was noted as “correct” or “incorrect”. The vaporizers' performance was evaluated using a self-calibrating gas analyzer. The vaporizer was classified as “correct” or “incorrect” when the vaporization error was less than or equal to, or more than 20%, respectively. The anesthetic machine was classified as “conforming” if all its components were noted as “correct” and no leaks were detected, or as “non-conforming” if any of the components was noted as “incorrect” or if a leak was detected. If the inspector was able to repair on-site the item malfunctions detected and the machine was fit for use, they issued a final report as “conforming.” On the contrary, if such malfunctions persisted, the final report was “non-conforming,” and a recommendation to remove the machine from service until its final repair was provided. To perform statistical analysis, each inspected item was used as predictor, classification and regression trees were built, and a random forest analysis was performed. A total of 2,001 anesthetic machines and 2,309 vaporizers were studied. After inspection, 42.7 and 26.4% of the machines were non-conforming and conforming, respectively, whereas 30.9% could be repaired in situ. A total of 27.1% of the isoflurane vaporizers and 35.9% of the sevoflurane vaporizers were incorrect. Machine learning techniques showed that the most important variables in the classification of the anesthetic machines as conforming or non-conforming were mostly the scavenger system and the canister, followed some way behind by the APL valve, source of oxygen, reservoir bag, vaporizer, and connections. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7779558/ /pubmed/33409295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.592597 Text en Copyright © 2020 Redondo, Domenech, Mateu, Bañeres, Martínez and Lopes. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Redondo, Jose I. Domenech, Luis Mateu, Cristina Bañeres, Alfon Martínez, Amalia Lopes, Diana Audit of Anesthetic Equipment in Veterinary Clinics in Spain and Portugal |
title | Audit of Anesthetic Equipment in Veterinary Clinics in Spain and Portugal |
title_full | Audit of Anesthetic Equipment in Veterinary Clinics in Spain and Portugal |
title_fullStr | Audit of Anesthetic Equipment in Veterinary Clinics in Spain and Portugal |
title_full_unstemmed | Audit of Anesthetic Equipment in Veterinary Clinics in Spain and Portugal |
title_short | Audit of Anesthetic Equipment in Veterinary Clinics in Spain and Portugal |
title_sort | audit of anesthetic equipment in veterinary clinics in spain and portugal |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7779558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.592597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT redondojosei auditofanestheticequipmentinveterinaryclinicsinspainandportugal AT domenechluis auditofanestheticequipmentinveterinaryclinicsinspainandportugal AT mateucristina auditofanestheticequipmentinveterinaryclinicsinspainandportugal AT baneresalfon auditofanestheticequipmentinveterinaryclinicsinspainandportugal AT martinezamalia auditofanestheticequipmentinveterinaryclinicsinspainandportugal AT lopesdiana auditofanestheticequipmentinveterinaryclinicsinspainandportugal |