Cargando…

Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using Pairwise Choices

BACKGROUND: Generic preference-based measures (GPBMs) such as the EQ-5D are valid across many conditions, but in some cases, “bolting on” additional dimensions may improve validity. The selection of “bolt-ons” has been based on the psychometric impact of individual dimensions, but preferences provid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finch, Aureliano Paolo, Brazier, John, Mukuria, Clara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20969686
_version_ 1783631474971377664
author Finch, Aureliano Paolo
Brazier, John
Mukuria, Clara
author_facet Finch, Aureliano Paolo
Brazier, John
Mukuria, Clara
author_sort Finch, Aureliano Paolo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Generic preference-based measures (GPBMs) such as the EQ-5D are valid across many conditions, but in some cases, “bolting on” additional dimensions may improve validity. The selection of “bolt-ons” has been based on the psychometric impact of individual dimensions, but preferences provide another important way to select them. This study aims to test the potential of using pairwise choices to inform the selection of bolt-ons for the EQ-5D-5L. METHODS: General population preferences were collected using an online survey of 1040 UK residents. Three EQ-5D-5L health state pairs were selected based on pairs that had a 50:50 split in respondent preferences from a previous pairwise survey. Participants were presented with pairwise choices of EQ-5D-5L health states without and with bolt-ons of hearing, sleep, cognition, energy, and relationships, each added individually. Logistic models were used to assess the impact of bolt-ons, as well as bolt-ons at different severity levels, on the log odds of responders choosing between health states. RESULTS: Preferences varied according to the bolt-ons and their severity level (only levels 1, 3, and 5 were used). Additions of bolt-ons at level 1 generally resulted in nonstatistically significant differences while additions of bolt-ons at level 3 and level 5 produced a negative and statistically significant impact on preferences for the health state with the bolt-on. At level 5, hearing had the largest impact, followed by cognition, relationships, energy, and sleep. At level 3, cognition produced the largest impact, followed by hearing and sleep with similar impacts, energy, and relationships. This ordering offers information for bolt-on selection, with hearing and cognition appearing as the most important. The weight placed on the different health problems is not constant across severity levels between bolt-ons. CONCLUSIONS: Pairwise choices provide a cost-effective approach of generating information on preferences to support bolt-on selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7780267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77802672021-01-13 Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using Pairwise Choices Finch, Aureliano Paolo Brazier, John Mukuria, Clara Med Decis Making Original Articles BACKGROUND: Generic preference-based measures (GPBMs) such as the EQ-5D are valid across many conditions, but in some cases, “bolting on” additional dimensions may improve validity. The selection of “bolt-ons” has been based on the psychometric impact of individual dimensions, but preferences provide another important way to select them. This study aims to test the potential of using pairwise choices to inform the selection of bolt-ons for the EQ-5D-5L. METHODS: General population preferences were collected using an online survey of 1040 UK residents. Three EQ-5D-5L health state pairs were selected based on pairs that had a 50:50 split in respondent preferences from a previous pairwise survey. Participants were presented with pairwise choices of EQ-5D-5L health states without and with bolt-ons of hearing, sleep, cognition, energy, and relationships, each added individually. Logistic models were used to assess the impact of bolt-ons, as well as bolt-ons at different severity levels, on the log odds of responders choosing between health states. RESULTS: Preferences varied according to the bolt-ons and their severity level (only levels 1, 3, and 5 were used). Additions of bolt-ons at level 1 generally resulted in nonstatistically significant differences while additions of bolt-ons at level 3 and level 5 produced a negative and statistically significant impact on preferences for the health state with the bolt-on. At level 5, hearing had the largest impact, followed by cognition, relationships, energy, and sleep. At level 3, cognition produced the largest impact, followed by hearing and sleep with similar impacts, energy, and relationships. This ordering offers information for bolt-on selection, with hearing and cognition appearing as the most important. The weight placed on the different health problems is not constant across severity levels between bolt-ons. CONCLUSIONS: Pairwise choices provide a cost-effective approach of generating information on preferences to support bolt-on selection. SAGE Publications 2020-11-30 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7780267/ /pubmed/33256502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20969686 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Finch, Aureliano Paolo
Brazier, John
Mukuria, Clara
Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using Pairwise Choices
title Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using Pairwise Choices
title_full Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using Pairwise Choices
title_fullStr Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using Pairwise Choices
title_full_unstemmed Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using Pairwise Choices
title_short Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using Pairwise Choices
title_sort selecting bolt-on dimensions for the eq-5d: testing the impact of hearing, sleep, cognition, energy, and relationships on preferences using pairwise choices
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20969686
work_keys_str_mv AT finchaurelianopaolo selectingboltondimensionsfortheeq5dtestingtheimpactofhearingsleepcognitionenergyandrelationshipsonpreferencesusingpairwisechoices
AT brazierjohn selectingboltondimensionsfortheeq5dtestingtheimpactofhearingsleepcognitionenergyandrelationshipsonpreferencesusingpairwisechoices
AT mukuriaclara selectingboltondimensionsfortheeq5dtestingtheimpactofhearingsleepcognitionenergyandrelationshipsonpreferencesusingpairwisechoices