Cargando…
Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using Pairwise Choices
BACKGROUND: Generic preference-based measures (GPBMs) such as the EQ-5D are valid across many conditions, but in some cases, “bolting on” additional dimensions may improve validity. The selection of “bolt-ons” has been based on the psychometric impact of individual dimensions, but preferences provid...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20969686 |
_version_ | 1783631474971377664 |
---|---|
author | Finch, Aureliano Paolo Brazier, John Mukuria, Clara |
author_facet | Finch, Aureliano Paolo Brazier, John Mukuria, Clara |
author_sort | Finch, Aureliano Paolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Generic preference-based measures (GPBMs) such as the EQ-5D are valid across many conditions, but in some cases, “bolting on” additional dimensions may improve validity. The selection of “bolt-ons” has been based on the psychometric impact of individual dimensions, but preferences provide another important way to select them. This study aims to test the potential of using pairwise choices to inform the selection of bolt-ons for the EQ-5D-5L. METHODS: General population preferences were collected using an online survey of 1040 UK residents. Three EQ-5D-5L health state pairs were selected based on pairs that had a 50:50 split in respondent preferences from a previous pairwise survey. Participants were presented with pairwise choices of EQ-5D-5L health states without and with bolt-ons of hearing, sleep, cognition, energy, and relationships, each added individually. Logistic models were used to assess the impact of bolt-ons, as well as bolt-ons at different severity levels, on the log odds of responders choosing between health states. RESULTS: Preferences varied according to the bolt-ons and their severity level (only levels 1, 3, and 5 were used). Additions of bolt-ons at level 1 generally resulted in nonstatistically significant differences while additions of bolt-ons at level 3 and level 5 produced a negative and statistically significant impact on preferences for the health state with the bolt-on. At level 5, hearing had the largest impact, followed by cognition, relationships, energy, and sleep. At level 3, cognition produced the largest impact, followed by hearing and sleep with similar impacts, energy, and relationships. This ordering offers information for bolt-on selection, with hearing and cognition appearing as the most important. The weight placed on the different health problems is not constant across severity levels between bolt-ons. CONCLUSIONS: Pairwise choices provide a cost-effective approach of generating information on preferences to support bolt-on selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7780267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77802672021-01-13 Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using Pairwise Choices Finch, Aureliano Paolo Brazier, John Mukuria, Clara Med Decis Making Original Articles BACKGROUND: Generic preference-based measures (GPBMs) such as the EQ-5D are valid across many conditions, but in some cases, “bolting on” additional dimensions may improve validity. The selection of “bolt-ons” has been based on the psychometric impact of individual dimensions, but preferences provide another important way to select them. This study aims to test the potential of using pairwise choices to inform the selection of bolt-ons for the EQ-5D-5L. METHODS: General population preferences were collected using an online survey of 1040 UK residents. Three EQ-5D-5L health state pairs were selected based on pairs that had a 50:50 split in respondent preferences from a previous pairwise survey. Participants were presented with pairwise choices of EQ-5D-5L health states without and with bolt-ons of hearing, sleep, cognition, energy, and relationships, each added individually. Logistic models were used to assess the impact of bolt-ons, as well as bolt-ons at different severity levels, on the log odds of responders choosing between health states. RESULTS: Preferences varied according to the bolt-ons and their severity level (only levels 1, 3, and 5 were used). Additions of bolt-ons at level 1 generally resulted in nonstatistically significant differences while additions of bolt-ons at level 3 and level 5 produced a negative and statistically significant impact on preferences for the health state with the bolt-on. At level 5, hearing had the largest impact, followed by cognition, relationships, energy, and sleep. At level 3, cognition produced the largest impact, followed by hearing and sleep with similar impacts, energy, and relationships. This ordering offers information for bolt-on selection, with hearing and cognition appearing as the most important. The weight placed on the different health problems is not constant across severity levels between bolt-ons. CONCLUSIONS: Pairwise choices provide a cost-effective approach of generating information on preferences to support bolt-on selection. SAGE Publications 2020-11-30 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7780267/ /pubmed/33256502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20969686 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Finch, Aureliano Paolo Brazier, John Mukuria, Clara Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using Pairwise Choices |
title | Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of
Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using
Pairwise Choices |
title_full | Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of
Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using
Pairwise Choices |
title_fullStr | Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of
Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using
Pairwise Choices |
title_full_unstemmed | Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of
Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using
Pairwise Choices |
title_short | Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of
Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using
Pairwise Choices |
title_sort | selecting bolt-on dimensions for the eq-5d: testing the impact of
hearing, sleep, cognition, energy, and relationships on preferences using
pairwise choices |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20969686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT finchaurelianopaolo selectingboltondimensionsfortheeq5dtestingtheimpactofhearingsleepcognitionenergyandrelationshipsonpreferencesusingpairwisechoices AT brazierjohn selectingboltondimensionsfortheeq5dtestingtheimpactofhearingsleepcognitionenergyandrelationshipsonpreferencesusingpairwisechoices AT mukuriaclara selectingboltondimensionsfortheeq5dtestingtheimpactofhearingsleepcognitionenergyandrelationshipsonpreferencesusingpairwisechoices |