Cargando…

What Are the Predictors of Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes After Shoulder Instability Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Prospectively collected responses to Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) questions after shoulder instability surgery are limited. Responses to these outcome measures are imperative to understanding their clinical utility. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayomy, Ahmad F., Schickendantz, Mark S., Briskin, Isaac N., Farrow, Lutul D., Grobaty, Lauren E., Jones, Morgan H., McCoy, Brett W., Miniaci, Anthony, Ricchetti, Eric T., Rosneck, James T., Sosic, Elizabeth, Spindler, Kurt P., Stearns, Kim L., Strnad, Greg J., Williams, James, Saluan, Paul M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120966343
_version_ 1783631484978987008
author Bayomy, Ahmad F.
Schickendantz, Mark S.
Briskin, Isaac N.
Farrow, Lutul D.
Grobaty, Lauren E.
Jones, Morgan H.
McCoy, Brett W.
Miniaci, Anthony
Ricchetti, Eric T.
Rosneck, James T.
Sosic, Elizabeth
Spindler, Kurt P.
Stearns, Kim L.
Strnad, Greg J.
Williams, James
Saluan, Paul M.
author_facet Bayomy, Ahmad F.
Schickendantz, Mark S.
Briskin, Isaac N.
Farrow, Lutul D.
Grobaty, Lauren E.
Jones, Morgan H.
McCoy, Brett W.
Miniaci, Anthony
Ricchetti, Eric T.
Rosneck, James T.
Sosic, Elizabeth
Spindler, Kurt P.
Stearns, Kim L.
Strnad, Greg J.
Williams, James
Saluan, Paul M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prospectively collected responses to Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) questions after shoulder instability surgery are limited. Responses to these outcome measures are imperative to understanding their clinical utility. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate which factors predict unfavorable patient-reported outcomes after shoulder instability surgery, including “no” to the PASS question. We hypothesized that poor outcomes would be associated with male adolescents, bone loss, combined labral tears, and articular cartilage injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Patients aged ≥13 years undergoing shoulder instability surgery were included in point-of-care data collection at a single institution across 12 surgeons between 2015 and 2017. Patients with anterior-inferior labral tears were included, and those with previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery were excluded. Demographics, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores, and surgical findings were obtained at baseline. ASES and SANE scores, PASS responses, and early revision surgery rates were obtained at a minimum of 1 year after the surgical intervention. Regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 176 completed follow-up responses (75.2%). Nonresponders had a younger age, greater frequency of glenoid bone loss, fewer combined tears, and more articular cartilage injuries (P < .05). Responders’ mean age was 25.1 years, and 22.2% were female. Early revision surgery occurred in 3.4% of these patients, and 76.1% responded yes to the PASS question. A yes response correlated with a mean 25-point improvement in the ASES score and a 40-point improvement in the SANE score. On multivariate analysis, combined labral tears (anterior-inferior plus superior or posterior tears) were associated with greater odds of responding no to the PASS question, while both combined tears and injured capsules were associated with lower ASES and SANE scores (P < .05). Sex, bone loss, and grade 3 to 4 articular cartilage injuries were not associated with variations on any patient-reported outcome measure. CONCLUSION: Patients largely approved of their symptom state at ≥1 year after shoulder instability surgery. A response of yes to the PASS question was given by 76.1% of patients and was correlated with clinically and statistically significant improvements in ASES and SANE scores. Combined labral tears and injured capsules were negative prognosticators across patient-reported outcome measures, whereas sex, bone loss, and cartilage injuries were not.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7780330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77803302021-01-13 What Are the Predictors of Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes After Shoulder Instability Surgery? Bayomy, Ahmad F. Schickendantz, Mark S. Briskin, Isaac N. Farrow, Lutul D. Grobaty, Lauren E. Jones, Morgan H. McCoy, Brett W. Miniaci, Anthony Ricchetti, Eric T. Rosneck, James T. Sosic, Elizabeth Spindler, Kurt P. Stearns, Kim L. Strnad, Greg J. Williams, James Saluan, Paul M. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Prospectively collected responses to Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) questions after shoulder instability surgery are limited. Responses to these outcome measures are imperative to understanding their clinical utility. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate which factors predict unfavorable patient-reported outcomes after shoulder instability surgery, including “no” to the PASS question. We hypothesized that poor outcomes would be associated with male adolescents, bone loss, combined labral tears, and articular cartilage injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Patients aged ≥13 years undergoing shoulder instability surgery were included in point-of-care data collection at a single institution across 12 surgeons between 2015 and 2017. Patients with anterior-inferior labral tears were included, and those with previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery were excluded. Demographics, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores, and surgical findings were obtained at baseline. ASES and SANE scores, PASS responses, and early revision surgery rates were obtained at a minimum of 1 year after the surgical intervention. Regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 176 completed follow-up responses (75.2%). Nonresponders had a younger age, greater frequency of glenoid bone loss, fewer combined tears, and more articular cartilage injuries (P < .05). Responders’ mean age was 25.1 years, and 22.2% were female. Early revision surgery occurred in 3.4% of these patients, and 76.1% responded yes to the PASS question. A yes response correlated with a mean 25-point improvement in the ASES score and a 40-point improvement in the SANE score. On multivariate analysis, combined labral tears (anterior-inferior plus superior or posterior tears) were associated with greater odds of responding no to the PASS question, while both combined tears and injured capsules were associated with lower ASES and SANE scores (P < .05). Sex, bone loss, and grade 3 to 4 articular cartilage injuries were not associated with variations on any patient-reported outcome measure. CONCLUSION: Patients largely approved of their symptom state at ≥1 year after shoulder instability surgery. A response of yes to the PASS question was given by 76.1% of patients and was correlated with clinically and statistically significant improvements in ASES and SANE scores. Combined labral tears and injured capsules were negative prognosticators across patient-reported outcome measures, whereas sex, bone loss, and cartilage injuries were not. SAGE Publications 2020-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7780330/ /pubmed/33447618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120966343 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Bayomy, Ahmad F.
Schickendantz, Mark S.
Briskin, Isaac N.
Farrow, Lutul D.
Grobaty, Lauren E.
Jones, Morgan H.
McCoy, Brett W.
Miniaci, Anthony
Ricchetti, Eric T.
Rosneck, James T.
Sosic, Elizabeth
Spindler, Kurt P.
Stearns, Kim L.
Strnad, Greg J.
Williams, James
Saluan, Paul M.
What Are the Predictors of Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes After Shoulder Instability Surgery?
title What Are the Predictors of Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes After Shoulder Instability Surgery?
title_full What Are the Predictors of Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes After Shoulder Instability Surgery?
title_fullStr What Are the Predictors of Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes After Shoulder Instability Surgery?
title_full_unstemmed What Are the Predictors of Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes After Shoulder Instability Surgery?
title_short What Are the Predictors of Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes After Shoulder Instability Surgery?
title_sort what are the predictors of poor patient-reported outcomes after shoulder instability surgery?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120966343
work_keys_str_mv AT whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT bayomyahmadf whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT schickendantzmarks whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT briskinisaacn whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT farrowlutuld whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT grobatylaurene whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT jonesmorganh whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT mccoybrettw whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT miniacianthony whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT ricchettierict whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT rosneckjamest whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT sosicelizabeth whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT spindlerkurtp whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT stearnskiml whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT strnadgregj whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT williamsjames whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery
AT saluanpaulm whatarethepredictorsofpoorpatientreportedoutcomesaftershoulderinstabilitysurgery