Cargando…

Strengthening research management and support services in sub-Saharan African universities and research institutions

Background: International development partners and research councils are increasingly funding research management and support (RMS) capacity strengthening initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) as part of a broader investment in strengthening national and regional research systems.  However, the ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pulford, Justin, Crossman, Susie, Begg, Sara, Amegee Quach, Jessica, Abomo, Pierre, El Hajj, Taghreed, Bates, Imelda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437927
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13100.2
_version_ 1783631486467964928
author Pulford, Justin
Crossman, Susie
Begg, Sara
Amegee Quach, Jessica
Abomo, Pierre
El Hajj, Taghreed
Bates, Imelda
author_facet Pulford, Justin
Crossman, Susie
Begg, Sara
Amegee Quach, Jessica
Abomo, Pierre
El Hajj, Taghreed
Bates, Imelda
author_sort Pulford, Justin
collection PubMed
description Background: International development partners and research councils are increasingly funding research management and support (RMS) capacity strengthening initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) as part of a broader investment in strengthening national and regional research systems.  However, the evidence-base to inform RMS capacity strengthening initiatives is limited at present. This research note presents a synthesis of 28 RMS capacity assessments completed in 25 universities/research institutions from across 15 SSA countries between 2014 and 2018.  Methods: All 28 capacity assessments were completed following a standardised methodology consisting of semi-structured interviews conducted with research and research support staff at the respective institution as well as document reviews and observation of onsite facilities. Data were extracted from the 28 reports detailing the findings of each assessment according to a framework synthesis approach. Results: In total, 13 distinct capacity gap categories emerged from across the 28 RMS capacity assessment reports.  Almost all the institutions assessed faced multiple gaps in RMS capacity within and across each of these 13 categories. The 13 categories were not independent of each other and were often closely inter-connected. Commonalities were also evident across multiple categories, the two most obvious of which were severe fiscal constraints and the often-complex bureaucracy of the institutional operating environment. Conclusions: The synthesis findings reveal multiple, commonly shared RMS capacity gaps in universities and research institutions across SSA. No single intervention type, or focus, would be sufficient to strengthen capacity across all 13 areas; rather, what is needed to facilitate a significant shift in RMS capacity within such SSA universities and research institutions is a combination of interventions, consisting of differing levels of cost and complexity, variously led (or supported) by both internal and external actors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7780342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77803422021-01-11 Strengthening research management and support services in sub-Saharan African universities and research institutions Pulford, Justin Crossman, Susie Begg, Sara Amegee Quach, Jessica Abomo, Pierre El Hajj, Taghreed Bates, Imelda AAS Open Res Research Note Background: International development partners and research councils are increasingly funding research management and support (RMS) capacity strengthening initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) as part of a broader investment in strengthening national and regional research systems.  However, the evidence-base to inform RMS capacity strengthening initiatives is limited at present. This research note presents a synthesis of 28 RMS capacity assessments completed in 25 universities/research institutions from across 15 SSA countries between 2014 and 2018.  Methods: All 28 capacity assessments were completed following a standardised methodology consisting of semi-structured interviews conducted with research and research support staff at the respective institution as well as document reviews and observation of onsite facilities. Data were extracted from the 28 reports detailing the findings of each assessment according to a framework synthesis approach. Results: In total, 13 distinct capacity gap categories emerged from across the 28 RMS capacity assessment reports.  Almost all the institutions assessed faced multiple gaps in RMS capacity within and across each of these 13 categories. The 13 categories were not independent of each other and were often closely inter-connected. Commonalities were also evident across multiple categories, the two most obvious of which were severe fiscal constraints and the often-complex bureaucracy of the institutional operating environment. Conclusions: The synthesis findings reveal multiple, commonly shared RMS capacity gaps in universities and research institutions across SSA. No single intervention type, or focus, would be sufficient to strengthen capacity across all 13 areas; rather, what is needed to facilitate a significant shift in RMS capacity within such SSA universities and research institutions is a combination of interventions, consisting of differing levels of cost and complexity, variously led (or supported) by both internal and external actors. F1000 Research Limited 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7780342/ /pubmed/33437927 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13100.2 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Pulford J et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Note
Pulford, Justin
Crossman, Susie
Begg, Sara
Amegee Quach, Jessica
Abomo, Pierre
El Hajj, Taghreed
Bates, Imelda
Strengthening research management and support services in sub-Saharan African universities and research institutions
title Strengthening research management and support services in sub-Saharan African universities and research institutions
title_full Strengthening research management and support services in sub-Saharan African universities and research institutions
title_fullStr Strengthening research management and support services in sub-Saharan African universities and research institutions
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening research management and support services in sub-Saharan African universities and research institutions
title_short Strengthening research management and support services in sub-Saharan African universities and research institutions
title_sort strengthening research management and support services in sub-saharan african universities and research institutions
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437927
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13100.2
work_keys_str_mv AT pulfordjustin strengtheningresearchmanagementandsupportservicesinsubsaharanafricanuniversitiesandresearchinstitutions
AT crossmansusie strengtheningresearchmanagementandsupportservicesinsubsaharanafricanuniversitiesandresearchinstitutions
AT beggsara strengtheningresearchmanagementandsupportservicesinsubsaharanafricanuniversitiesandresearchinstitutions
AT amegeequachjessica strengtheningresearchmanagementandsupportservicesinsubsaharanafricanuniversitiesandresearchinstitutions
AT abomopierre strengtheningresearchmanagementandsupportservicesinsubsaharanafricanuniversitiesandresearchinstitutions
AT elhajjtaghreed strengtheningresearchmanagementandsupportservicesinsubsaharanafricanuniversitiesandresearchinstitutions
AT batesimelda strengtheningresearchmanagementandsupportservicesinsubsaharanafricanuniversitiesandresearchinstitutions