Cargando…

Development and validation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in Spain

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a new questionnaire to measure the nurses’ perceptions of the barriers towards the prevention of pressure injuries (PIs) at hospitals. DESIGN: Validation study with mixed methods. SETTING: Four university hospitals in southern Spain. PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopez-Franco, Maria Dolores, Parra-Anguita, Laura, Comino-Sanz, Ines Maria, Pancorbo-Hidalgo, Pedro L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041376
_version_ 1783631516380692480
author Lopez-Franco, Maria Dolores
Parra-Anguita, Laura
Comino-Sanz, Ines Maria
Pancorbo-Hidalgo, Pedro L
author_facet Lopez-Franco, Maria Dolores
Parra-Anguita, Laura
Comino-Sanz, Ines Maria
Pancorbo-Hidalgo, Pedro L
author_sort Lopez-Franco, Maria Dolores
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a new questionnaire to measure the nurses’ perceptions of the barriers towards the prevention of pressure injuries (PIs) at hospitals. DESIGN: Validation study with mixed methods. SETTING: Four university hospitals in southern Spain. PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was developed based on a literature review. A panel of 14 wound care experts rated the content validity. A sample of 438 nurses (registered nurses and assistant nurses) participated in the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The psychometric properties of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers (PIPB) questionnaire evaluated were: content validity, internal consistency reliability and construct validity. RESULTS: The final version of the questionnaire has 25 items grouped into four factors (management and organisation, motivation and priority, knowledge, and staff and collaboration). The confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit and error indices for the model (Comparative Fit Index=0.92, root mean square error of approximation=0.074). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90 (overall), and 0.89 (factor 1), 0.75 (factor 2), 0.72 (factor 3) and 0.45 (factor 4). Construct validity was good, demonstrated by the expected association with the scores on patient safety culture and on considering PIs as an adverse effect of hospital stay, but not with attitude score. CONCLUSION: The PIPB questionnaire is an instrument useful for measuring nurses’ perceptions of the barriers to PIs prevention. The initial evidence shows that the questionnaire has good content validity, internal consistency and adequate construct validity. Relevance and comprehensiveness need to be assessed in further studies. It can be used both in research and in the evaluation of clinical settings to implementation of PIs preventive programmes in hospitals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7780508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77805082021-01-11 Development and validation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in Spain Lopez-Franco, Maria Dolores Parra-Anguita, Laura Comino-Sanz, Ines Maria Pancorbo-Hidalgo, Pedro L BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a new questionnaire to measure the nurses’ perceptions of the barriers towards the prevention of pressure injuries (PIs) at hospitals. DESIGN: Validation study with mixed methods. SETTING: Four university hospitals in southern Spain. PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was developed based on a literature review. A panel of 14 wound care experts rated the content validity. A sample of 438 nurses (registered nurses and assistant nurses) participated in the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The psychometric properties of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers (PIPB) questionnaire evaluated were: content validity, internal consistency reliability and construct validity. RESULTS: The final version of the questionnaire has 25 items grouped into four factors (management and organisation, motivation and priority, knowledge, and staff and collaboration). The confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit and error indices for the model (Comparative Fit Index=0.92, root mean square error of approximation=0.074). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90 (overall), and 0.89 (factor 1), 0.75 (factor 2), 0.72 (factor 3) and 0.45 (factor 4). Construct validity was good, demonstrated by the expected association with the scores on patient safety culture and on considering PIs as an adverse effect of hospital stay, but not with attitude score. CONCLUSION: The PIPB questionnaire is an instrument useful for measuring nurses’ perceptions of the barriers to PIs prevention. The initial evidence shows that the questionnaire has good content validity, internal consistency and adequate construct validity. Relevance and comprehensiveness need to be assessed in further studies. It can be used both in research and in the evaluation of clinical settings to implementation of PIs preventive programmes in hospitals. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7780508/ /pubmed/33380485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041376 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Nursing
Lopez-Franco, Maria Dolores
Parra-Anguita, Laura
Comino-Sanz, Ines Maria
Pancorbo-Hidalgo, Pedro L
Development and validation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in Spain
title Development and validation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in Spain
title_full Development and validation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in Spain
title_fullStr Development and validation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in Spain
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in Spain
title_short Development and validation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in Spain
title_sort development and validation of the pressure injury prevention barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in spain
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041376
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezfrancomariadolores developmentandvalidationofthepressureinjurypreventionbarriersquestionnaireinhospitalnursesinspain
AT parraanguitalaura developmentandvalidationofthepressureinjurypreventionbarriersquestionnaireinhospitalnursesinspain
AT cominosanzinesmaria developmentandvalidationofthepressureinjurypreventionbarriersquestionnaireinhospitalnursesinspain
AT pancorbohidalgopedrol developmentandvalidationofthepressureinjurypreventionbarriersquestionnaireinhospitalnursesinspain