Cargando…
Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy
OBJECTIVES: Patients with lupus membranous nephropathy (LMN) are at risk for prolonged proteinuria and progressive chronic kidney disease. There are no proven effective treatments for LMN, and controlled trials are lacking. This trial assessed the preferential Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor filgoti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001490 |
_version_ | 1783631520816168960 |
---|---|
author | Baker, Matthew Chaichian, Yashaar Genovese, Mark Derebail, Vimal Rao, Panduranga Chatham, Winn Bubb, Michael Lim, Sam Hajian, Hooman Gurtovaya, Oksana Patel, Uptal Tumlin, James |
author_facet | Baker, Matthew Chaichian, Yashaar Genovese, Mark Derebail, Vimal Rao, Panduranga Chatham, Winn Bubb, Michael Lim, Sam Hajian, Hooman Gurtovaya, Oksana Patel, Uptal Tumlin, James |
author_sort | Baker, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Patients with lupus membranous nephropathy (LMN) are at risk for prolonged proteinuria and progressive chronic kidney disease. There are no proven effective treatments for LMN, and controlled trials are lacking. This trial assessed the preferential Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor filgotinib and the spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor lanraplenib in patients with LMN. METHODS: This was a phase II, randomised, double-blind trial conducted at 15 centres in the USA to evaluate the safety and efficacy of filgotinib or lanraplenib for the treatment of LMN. Eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to receive either filgotinib or lanraplenib in a blinded fashion for up to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the per cent change in 24-hour urine protein from baseline to week 16. RESULTS: Nine patients were randomised to receive filgotinib (n=5) or lanraplenib (n=4). Four patients in the filgotinib group and one patient in the lanraplenib group completed week 16. There was a median reduction of 50.7% in 24-hour urine protein after 16 weeks of treatment with filgotinib (n=4), and the median Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index from the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment score remained stable. Filgotinib treatment was well tolerated. Limited conclusions can be drawn about treatment with lanraplenib. CONCLUSION: The number of patients treated in this study was small, and only limited conclusions can be drawn. There may be a therapeutic benefit with filgotinib treatment, which may support future investigations with filgotinib or other JAK inhibitors in patients with LMN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03285711. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7780527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77805272021-01-11 Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy Baker, Matthew Chaichian, Yashaar Genovese, Mark Derebail, Vimal Rao, Panduranga Chatham, Winn Bubb, Michael Lim, Sam Hajian, Hooman Gurtovaya, Oksana Patel, Uptal Tumlin, James RMD Open Lupus OBJECTIVES: Patients with lupus membranous nephropathy (LMN) are at risk for prolonged proteinuria and progressive chronic kidney disease. There are no proven effective treatments for LMN, and controlled trials are lacking. This trial assessed the preferential Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor filgotinib and the spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor lanraplenib in patients with LMN. METHODS: This was a phase II, randomised, double-blind trial conducted at 15 centres in the USA to evaluate the safety and efficacy of filgotinib or lanraplenib for the treatment of LMN. Eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to receive either filgotinib or lanraplenib in a blinded fashion for up to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the per cent change in 24-hour urine protein from baseline to week 16. RESULTS: Nine patients were randomised to receive filgotinib (n=5) or lanraplenib (n=4). Four patients in the filgotinib group and one patient in the lanraplenib group completed week 16. There was a median reduction of 50.7% in 24-hour urine protein after 16 weeks of treatment with filgotinib (n=4), and the median Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index from the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment score remained stable. Filgotinib treatment was well tolerated. Limited conclusions can be drawn about treatment with lanraplenib. CONCLUSION: The number of patients treated in this study was small, and only limited conclusions can be drawn. There may be a therapeutic benefit with filgotinib treatment, which may support future investigations with filgotinib or other JAK inhibitors in patients with LMN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03285711. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7780527/ /pubmed/33380521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001490 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Lupus Baker, Matthew Chaichian, Yashaar Genovese, Mark Derebail, Vimal Rao, Panduranga Chatham, Winn Bubb, Michael Lim, Sam Hajian, Hooman Gurtovaya, Oksana Patel, Uptal Tumlin, James Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy |
title | Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy |
title_full | Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy |
title_fullStr | Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy |
title_short | Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy |
title_sort | phase ii, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy |
topic | Lupus |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakermatthew phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy AT chaichianyashaar phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy AT genovesemark phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy AT derebailvimal phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy AT raopanduranga phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy AT chathamwinn phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy AT bubbmichael phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy AT limsam phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy AT hajianhooman phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy AT gurtovayaoksana phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy AT pateluptal phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy AT tumlinjames phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy |