Cargando…

Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy

OBJECTIVES: Patients with lupus membranous nephropathy (LMN) are at risk for prolonged proteinuria and progressive chronic kidney disease. There are no proven effective treatments for LMN, and controlled trials are lacking. This trial assessed the preferential Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor filgoti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Matthew, Chaichian, Yashaar, Genovese, Mark, Derebail, Vimal, Rao, Panduranga, Chatham, Winn, Bubb, Michael, Lim, Sam, Hajian, Hooman, Gurtovaya, Oksana, Patel, Uptal, Tumlin, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001490
_version_ 1783631520816168960
author Baker, Matthew
Chaichian, Yashaar
Genovese, Mark
Derebail, Vimal
Rao, Panduranga
Chatham, Winn
Bubb, Michael
Lim, Sam
Hajian, Hooman
Gurtovaya, Oksana
Patel, Uptal
Tumlin, James
author_facet Baker, Matthew
Chaichian, Yashaar
Genovese, Mark
Derebail, Vimal
Rao, Panduranga
Chatham, Winn
Bubb, Michael
Lim, Sam
Hajian, Hooman
Gurtovaya, Oksana
Patel, Uptal
Tumlin, James
author_sort Baker, Matthew
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Patients with lupus membranous nephropathy (LMN) are at risk for prolonged proteinuria and progressive chronic kidney disease. There are no proven effective treatments for LMN, and controlled trials are lacking. This trial assessed the preferential Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor filgotinib and the spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor lanraplenib in patients with LMN. METHODS: This was a phase II, randomised, double-blind trial conducted at 15 centres in the USA to evaluate the safety and efficacy of filgotinib or lanraplenib for the treatment of LMN. Eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to receive either filgotinib or lanraplenib in a blinded fashion for up to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the per cent change in 24-hour urine protein from baseline to week 16. RESULTS: Nine patients were randomised to receive filgotinib (n=5) or lanraplenib (n=4). Four patients in the filgotinib group and one patient in the lanraplenib group completed week 16. There was a median reduction of 50.7% in 24-hour urine protein after 16 weeks of treatment with filgotinib (n=4), and the median Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index from the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment score remained stable. Filgotinib treatment was well tolerated. Limited conclusions can be drawn about treatment with lanraplenib. CONCLUSION: The number of patients treated in this study was small, and only limited conclusions can be drawn. There may be a therapeutic benefit with filgotinib treatment, which may support future investigations with filgotinib or other JAK inhibitors in patients with LMN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03285711.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7780527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77805272021-01-11 Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy Baker, Matthew Chaichian, Yashaar Genovese, Mark Derebail, Vimal Rao, Panduranga Chatham, Winn Bubb, Michael Lim, Sam Hajian, Hooman Gurtovaya, Oksana Patel, Uptal Tumlin, James RMD Open Lupus OBJECTIVES: Patients with lupus membranous nephropathy (LMN) are at risk for prolonged proteinuria and progressive chronic kidney disease. There are no proven effective treatments for LMN, and controlled trials are lacking. This trial assessed the preferential Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor filgotinib and the spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor lanraplenib in patients with LMN. METHODS: This was a phase II, randomised, double-blind trial conducted at 15 centres in the USA to evaluate the safety and efficacy of filgotinib or lanraplenib for the treatment of LMN. Eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to receive either filgotinib or lanraplenib in a blinded fashion for up to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the per cent change in 24-hour urine protein from baseline to week 16. RESULTS: Nine patients were randomised to receive filgotinib (n=5) or lanraplenib (n=4). Four patients in the filgotinib group and one patient in the lanraplenib group completed week 16. There was a median reduction of 50.7% in 24-hour urine protein after 16 weeks of treatment with filgotinib (n=4), and the median Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index from the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment score remained stable. Filgotinib treatment was well tolerated. Limited conclusions can be drawn about treatment with lanraplenib. CONCLUSION: The number of patients treated in this study was small, and only limited conclusions can be drawn. There may be a therapeutic benefit with filgotinib treatment, which may support future investigations with filgotinib or other JAK inhibitors in patients with LMN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03285711. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7780527/ /pubmed/33380521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001490 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Lupus
Baker, Matthew
Chaichian, Yashaar
Genovese, Mark
Derebail, Vimal
Rao, Panduranga
Chatham, Winn
Bubb, Michael
Lim, Sam
Hajian, Hooman
Gurtovaya, Oksana
Patel, Uptal
Tumlin, James
Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy
title Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy
title_full Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy
title_fullStr Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy
title_full_unstemmed Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy
title_short Phase II, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy
title_sort phase ii, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of filgotinib and lanraplenib in patients with lupus membranous nephropathy
topic Lupus
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001490
work_keys_str_mv AT bakermatthew phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy
AT chaichianyashaar phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy
AT genovesemark phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy
AT derebailvimal phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy
AT raopanduranga phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy
AT chathamwinn phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy
AT bubbmichael phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy
AT limsam phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy
AT hajianhooman phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy
AT gurtovayaoksana phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy
AT pateluptal phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy
AT tumlinjames phaseiirandomiseddoubleblindmulticentrestudyevaluatingthesafetyandefficacyoffilgotinibandlanraplenibinpatientswithlupusmembranousnephropathy