Cargando…
A randomised controlled trial comparing palate surgery at 6 months versus 12 months of age (the TOPS trial): a statistical analysis plan
BACKGROUND: Cleft palate is among the most common birth abnormalities. The success of primary surgery in the early months of life is crucial for successful feeding, hearing, dental development, and facial growth. Over recent decades, age at palatal surgery in infancy has reduced. The Timing Of Prima...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33397459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04886-y |
_version_ | 1783631549121429504 |
---|---|
author | Conroy, Elizabeth J. Cooper, Rachael Shaw, William Persson, Christina Willadsen, Elisabeth Munro, Kevin J. Williamson, Paula R. Semb, Gunvor Walsh, Tanya Gamble, Carrol |
author_facet | Conroy, Elizabeth J. Cooper, Rachael Shaw, William Persson, Christina Willadsen, Elisabeth Munro, Kevin J. Williamson, Paula R. Semb, Gunvor Walsh, Tanya Gamble, Carrol |
author_sort | Conroy, Elizabeth J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cleft palate is among the most common birth abnormalities. The success of primary surgery in the early months of life is crucial for successful feeding, hearing, dental development, and facial growth. Over recent decades, age at palatal surgery in infancy has reduced. The Timing Of Primary Surgery for cleft palate (TOPS) trial aims to determine whether, in infants with cleft palate, it is better to perform primary surgery at age 6 or 12 months (corrected for gestational age). METHODS/DESIGN: The TOPS trial is an international, two-arm, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. The primary outcome is insufficient velopharyngeal function at 5 years of age. Secondary outcomes, measured at 12 months, 3 years, and 5 years of age, include measures of speech development, safety of the procedure, hearing level, middle ear function, dentofacial development, and growth. The analysis approaches for primary and secondary outcomes are described here, as are the descriptive statistics which will be reported. The TOPS protocol has been published previously. DISCUSSION: This paper provides details of the planned statistical analyses for the TOPS trial and will reduce the risk of outcome reporting bias and data-driven results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00993551. Registered on 9 October 2009. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-020-04886-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7780678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77806782021-01-05 A randomised controlled trial comparing palate surgery at 6 months versus 12 months of age (the TOPS trial): a statistical analysis plan Conroy, Elizabeth J. Cooper, Rachael Shaw, William Persson, Christina Willadsen, Elisabeth Munro, Kevin J. Williamson, Paula R. Semb, Gunvor Walsh, Tanya Gamble, Carrol Trials Update BACKGROUND: Cleft palate is among the most common birth abnormalities. The success of primary surgery in the early months of life is crucial for successful feeding, hearing, dental development, and facial growth. Over recent decades, age at palatal surgery in infancy has reduced. The Timing Of Primary Surgery for cleft palate (TOPS) trial aims to determine whether, in infants with cleft palate, it is better to perform primary surgery at age 6 or 12 months (corrected for gestational age). METHODS/DESIGN: The TOPS trial is an international, two-arm, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. The primary outcome is insufficient velopharyngeal function at 5 years of age. Secondary outcomes, measured at 12 months, 3 years, and 5 years of age, include measures of speech development, safety of the procedure, hearing level, middle ear function, dentofacial development, and growth. The analysis approaches for primary and secondary outcomes are described here, as are the descriptive statistics which will be reported. The TOPS protocol has been published previously. DISCUSSION: This paper provides details of the planned statistical analyses for the TOPS trial and will reduce the risk of outcome reporting bias and data-driven results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00993551. Registered on 9 October 2009. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-020-04886-y. BioMed Central 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7780678/ /pubmed/33397459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04886-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Update Conroy, Elizabeth J. Cooper, Rachael Shaw, William Persson, Christina Willadsen, Elisabeth Munro, Kevin J. Williamson, Paula R. Semb, Gunvor Walsh, Tanya Gamble, Carrol A randomised controlled trial comparing palate surgery at 6 months versus 12 months of age (the TOPS trial): a statistical analysis plan |
title | A randomised controlled trial comparing palate surgery at 6 months versus 12 months of age (the TOPS trial): a statistical analysis plan |
title_full | A randomised controlled trial comparing palate surgery at 6 months versus 12 months of age (the TOPS trial): a statistical analysis plan |
title_fullStr | A randomised controlled trial comparing palate surgery at 6 months versus 12 months of age (the TOPS trial): a statistical analysis plan |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised controlled trial comparing palate surgery at 6 months versus 12 months of age (the TOPS trial): a statistical analysis plan |
title_short | A randomised controlled trial comparing palate surgery at 6 months versus 12 months of age (the TOPS trial): a statistical analysis plan |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial comparing palate surgery at 6 months versus 12 months of age (the tops trial): a statistical analysis plan |
topic | Update |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33397459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04886-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conroyelizabethj arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT cooperrachael arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT shawwilliam arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT perssonchristina arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT willadsenelisabeth arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT munrokevinj arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT williamsonpaular arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT sembgunvor arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT walshtanya arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT gamblecarrol arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT conroyelizabethj randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT cooperrachael randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT shawwilliam randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT perssonchristina randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT willadsenelisabeth randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT munrokevinj randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT williamsonpaular randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT sembgunvor randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT walshtanya randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT gamblecarrol randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan AT randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingpalatesurgeryat6monthsversus12monthsofagethetopstrialastatisticalanalysisplan |