Cargando…

Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the presence of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the risk of subsequent reinfection remains unclear. METHODS: We investigated the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in serop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lumley, Sheila F., O’Donnell, Denise, Stoesser, Nicole E., Matthews, Philippa C., Howarth, Alison, Hatch, Stephanie B., Marsden, Brian D., Cox, Stuart, James, Tim, Warren, Fiona, Peck, Liam J., Ritter, Thomas G., de Toledo, Zoe, Warren, Laura, Axten, David, Cornall, Richard J., Jones, E. Yvonne, Stuart, David I., Screaton, Gavin, Ebner, Daniel, Hoosdally, Sarah, Chand, Meera, Crook, Derrick W., O’Donnell, Anne-Marie, Conlon, Christopher P., Pouwels, Koen B., Walker, A. Sarah, Peto, Tim E.A., Hopkins, Susan, Walker, Timothy M., Jeffery, Katie, Eyre, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Massachusetts Medical Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7781098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33369366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2034545
_version_ 1783631615139774464
author Lumley, Sheila F.
O’Donnell, Denise
Stoesser, Nicole E.
Matthews, Philippa C.
Howarth, Alison
Hatch, Stephanie B.
Marsden, Brian D.
Cox, Stuart
James, Tim
Warren, Fiona
Peck, Liam J.
Ritter, Thomas G.
de Toledo, Zoe
Warren, Laura
Axten, David
Cornall, Richard J.
Jones, E. Yvonne
Stuart, David I.
Screaton, Gavin
Ebner, Daniel
Hoosdally, Sarah
Chand, Meera
Crook, Derrick W.
O’Donnell, Anne-Marie
Conlon, Christopher P.
Pouwels, Koen B.
Walker, A. Sarah
Peto, Tim E.A.
Hopkins, Susan
Walker, Timothy M.
Jeffery, Katie
Eyre, David W.
author_facet Lumley, Sheila F.
O’Donnell, Denise
Stoesser, Nicole E.
Matthews, Philippa C.
Howarth, Alison
Hatch, Stephanie B.
Marsden, Brian D.
Cox, Stuart
James, Tim
Warren, Fiona
Peck, Liam J.
Ritter, Thomas G.
de Toledo, Zoe
Warren, Laura
Axten, David
Cornall, Richard J.
Jones, E. Yvonne
Stuart, David I.
Screaton, Gavin
Ebner, Daniel
Hoosdally, Sarah
Chand, Meera
Crook, Derrick W.
O’Donnell, Anne-Marie
Conlon, Christopher P.
Pouwels, Koen B.
Walker, A. Sarah
Peto, Tim E.A.
Hopkins, Susan
Walker, Timothy M.
Jeffery, Katie
Eyre, David W.
author_sort Lumley, Sheila F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relationship between the presence of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the risk of subsequent reinfection remains unclear. METHODS: We investigated the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in seropositive and seronegative health care workers attending testing of asymptomatic and symptomatic staff at Oxford University Hospitals in the United Kingdom. Baseline antibody status was determined by anti-spike (primary analysis) and anti-nucleocapsid IgG assays, and staff members were followed for up to 31 weeks. We estimated the relative incidence of PCR-positive test results and new symptomatic infection according to antibody status, adjusting for age, participant-reported gender, and changes in incidence over time. RESULTS: A total of 12,541 health care workers participated and had anti-spike IgG measured; 11,364 were followed up after negative antibody results and 1265 after positive results, including 88 in whom seroconversion occurred during follow-up. A total of 223 anti-spike–seronegative health care workers had a positive PCR test (1.09 per 10,000 days at risk), 100 during screening while they were asymptomatic and 123 while symptomatic, whereas 2 anti-spike–seropositive health care workers had a positive PCR test (0.13 per 10,000 days at risk), and both workers were asymptomatic when tested (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.44; P=0.002). There were no symptomatic infections in workers with anti-spike antibodies. Rate ratios were similar when the anti-nucleocapsid IgG assay was used alone or in combination with the anti-spike IgG assay to determine baseline status. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of anti-spike or anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies was associated with a substantially reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the ensuing 6 months. (Funded by the U.K. Government Department of Health and Social Care and others.)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7781098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Massachusetts Medical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77810982021-01-05 Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers Lumley, Sheila F. O’Donnell, Denise Stoesser, Nicole E. Matthews, Philippa C. Howarth, Alison Hatch, Stephanie B. Marsden, Brian D. Cox, Stuart James, Tim Warren, Fiona Peck, Liam J. Ritter, Thomas G. de Toledo, Zoe Warren, Laura Axten, David Cornall, Richard J. Jones, E. Yvonne Stuart, David I. Screaton, Gavin Ebner, Daniel Hoosdally, Sarah Chand, Meera Crook, Derrick W. O’Donnell, Anne-Marie Conlon, Christopher P. Pouwels, Koen B. Walker, A. Sarah Peto, Tim E.A. Hopkins, Susan Walker, Timothy M. Jeffery, Katie Eyre, David W. N Engl J Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The relationship between the presence of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the risk of subsequent reinfection remains unclear. METHODS: We investigated the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in seropositive and seronegative health care workers attending testing of asymptomatic and symptomatic staff at Oxford University Hospitals in the United Kingdom. Baseline antibody status was determined by anti-spike (primary analysis) and anti-nucleocapsid IgG assays, and staff members were followed for up to 31 weeks. We estimated the relative incidence of PCR-positive test results and new symptomatic infection according to antibody status, adjusting for age, participant-reported gender, and changes in incidence over time. RESULTS: A total of 12,541 health care workers participated and had anti-spike IgG measured; 11,364 were followed up after negative antibody results and 1265 after positive results, including 88 in whom seroconversion occurred during follow-up. A total of 223 anti-spike–seronegative health care workers had a positive PCR test (1.09 per 10,000 days at risk), 100 during screening while they were asymptomatic and 123 while symptomatic, whereas 2 anti-spike–seropositive health care workers had a positive PCR test (0.13 per 10,000 days at risk), and both workers were asymptomatic when tested (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.44; P=0.002). There were no symptomatic infections in workers with anti-spike antibodies. Rate ratios were similar when the anti-nucleocapsid IgG assay was used alone or in combination with the anti-spike IgG assay to determine baseline status. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of anti-spike or anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies was associated with a substantially reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the ensuing 6 months. (Funded by the U.K. Government Department of Health and Social Care and others.) Massachusetts Medical Society 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7781098/ /pubmed/33369366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2034545 Text en Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. http://www.nejmgroup.org/legal/terms-of-use.htm This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use, except commercial resale, and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgment of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the Covid-19 pandemic or until revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, subject to existing copyright protections.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lumley, Sheila F.
O’Donnell, Denise
Stoesser, Nicole E.
Matthews, Philippa C.
Howarth, Alison
Hatch, Stephanie B.
Marsden, Brian D.
Cox, Stuart
James, Tim
Warren, Fiona
Peck, Liam J.
Ritter, Thomas G.
de Toledo, Zoe
Warren, Laura
Axten, David
Cornall, Richard J.
Jones, E. Yvonne
Stuart, David I.
Screaton, Gavin
Ebner, Daniel
Hoosdally, Sarah
Chand, Meera
Crook, Derrick W.
O’Donnell, Anne-Marie
Conlon, Christopher P.
Pouwels, Koen B.
Walker, A. Sarah
Peto, Tim E.A.
Hopkins, Susan
Walker, Timothy M.
Jeffery, Katie
Eyre, David W.
Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers
title Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers
title_full Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers
title_fullStr Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers
title_full_unstemmed Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers
title_short Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers
title_sort antibody status and incidence of sars-cov-2 infection in health care workers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7781098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33369366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2034545
work_keys_str_mv AT lumleysheilaf antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT odonnelldenise antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT stoessernicolee antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT matthewsphilippac antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT howarthalison antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT hatchstephanieb antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT marsdenbriand antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT coxstuart antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT jamestim antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT warrenfiona antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT peckliamj antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT ritterthomasg antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT detoledozoe antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT warrenlaura antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT axtendavid antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT cornallrichardj antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT joneseyvonne antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT stuartdavidi antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT screatongavin antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT ebnerdaniel antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT hoosdallysarah antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT chandmeera antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT crookderrickw antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT odonnellannemarie antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT conlonchristopherp antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT pouwelskoenb antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT walkerasarah antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT petotimea antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT hopkinssusan antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT walkertimothym antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT jefferykatie antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT eyredavidw antibodystatusandincidenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers