Cargando…

The Productivity of Medical Publication on COVID-19 in the First Half of 2020: A Retrospective Analysis of Articles Available in PubMed

Background The control of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic depends on the profound investigation of the virus biology and its consequences. We aimed to analyze the COVID-19 research productivity of authors representing different countries and associations between the number of articl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nowak, Bartosz M, Kamiński, Mikołaj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7781502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409059
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11814
_version_ 1783631690244030464
author Nowak, Bartosz M
Kamiński, Mikołaj
author_facet Nowak, Bartosz M
Kamiński, Mikołaj
author_sort Nowak, Bartosz M
collection PubMed
description Background The control of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic depends on the profound investigation of the virus biology and its consequences. We aimed to analyze the COVID-19 research productivity of authors representing different countries and associations between the number of articles and COVID-19 spread. Methods We retrieved all articles on COVID-19 indexed in PubMed between 31 December 2019 and 30 June 2020. We identified the countries of individual authors’ affiliations. We performed the R Spearman rank correlation test between the number of articles with at least one author from a country per one million citizens and Human Development Index (HDI), a number of COVID-19 cases and deaths per one million citizens before 1 July 2020. Results Overall, we identified 27,815 articles, including 18,225 original contributions, 2,449 reviews, and 69 meta-analyses on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The highest productivity characterized the authors coming from China (n = 11,519 articles with at least one author), followed by the United States of America (n = 9,666) and Italy (n = 7,261). The number of articles on COVID-19 associated with HDI (Rs = 0.79), the numbers of cases (Rs = 0.47), and deaths (Rs = 0.46) (all p < 0.001). Conclusions Early COVID-19 researches were most often authored by researchers from highly developed countries and those affected by the rapid initial spread of SARS-CoV-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7781502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77815022021-01-05 The Productivity of Medical Publication on COVID-19 in the First Half of 2020: A Retrospective Analysis of Articles Available in PubMed Nowak, Bartosz M Kamiński, Mikołaj Cureus Medical Education Background The control of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic depends on the profound investigation of the virus biology and its consequences. We aimed to analyze the COVID-19 research productivity of authors representing different countries and associations between the number of articles and COVID-19 spread. Methods We retrieved all articles on COVID-19 indexed in PubMed between 31 December 2019 and 30 June 2020. We identified the countries of individual authors’ affiliations. We performed the R Spearman rank correlation test between the number of articles with at least one author from a country per one million citizens and Human Development Index (HDI), a number of COVID-19 cases and deaths per one million citizens before 1 July 2020. Results Overall, we identified 27,815 articles, including 18,225 original contributions, 2,449 reviews, and 69 meta-analyses on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The highest productivity characterized the authors coming from China (n = 11,519 articles with at least one author), followed by the United States of America (n = 9,666) and Italy (n = 7,261). The number of articles on COVID-19 associated with HDI (Rs = 0.79), the numbers of cases (Rs = 0.47), and deaths (Rs = 0.46) (all p < 0.001). Conclusions Early COVID-19 researches were most often authored by researchers from highly developed countries and those affected by the rapid initial spread of SARS-CoV-2. Cureus 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7781502/ /pubmed/33409059 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11814 Text en Copyright © 2020, Nowak et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Education
Nowak, Bartosz M
Kamiński, Mikołaj
The Productivity of Medical Publication on COVID-19 in the First Half of 2020: A Retrospective Analysis of Articles Available in PubMed
title The Productivity of Medical Publication on COVID-19 in the First Half of 2020: A Retrospective Analysis of Articles Available in PubMed
title_full The Productivity of Medical Publication on COVID-19 in the First Half of 2020: A Retrospective Analysis of Articles Available in PubMed
title_fullStr The Productivity of Medical Publication on COVID-19 in the First Half of 2020: A Retrospective Analysis of Articles Available in PubMed
title_full_unstemmed The Productivity of Medical Publication on COVID-19 in the First Half of 2020: A Retrospective Analysis of Articles Available in PubMed
title_short The Productivity of Medical Publication on COVID-19 in the First Half of 2020: A Retrospective Analysis of Articles Available in PubMed
title_sort productivity of medical publication on covid-19 in the first half of 2020: a retrospective analysis of articles available in pubmed
topic Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7781502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409059
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11814
work_keys_str_mv AT nowakbartoszm theproductivityofmedicalpublicationoncovid19inthefirsthalfof2020aretrospectiveanalysisofarticlesavailableinpubmed
AT kaminskimikołaj theproductivityofmedicalpublicationoncovid19inthefirsthalfof2020aretrospectiveanalysisofarticlesavailableinpubmed
AT nowakbartoszm productivityofmedicalpublicationoncovid19inthefirsthalfof2020aretrospectiveanalysisofarticlesavailableinpubmed
AT kaminskimikołaj productivityofmedicalpublicationoncovid19inthefirsthalfof2020aretrospectiveanalysisofarticlesavailableinpubmed