Cargando…
Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes
The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the pretreatment methods and sampling time on the sampling of airborne bacteria in hospitals. Methods for the pretreatment of Andersen samplers, namely, non-sterilized, 75% ethanol and autoclaving sampled for 5 min, 10 min and 15 min in the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7781652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-020-09668-2 |
_version_ | 1783631719601012736 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Yan Zhang, Jingwei Wang, Shumei Yu, Lingqi Yu, Hao Wang, Yuwen Feng, Lihong |
author_facet | Zhao, Yan Zhang, Jingwei Wang, Shumei Yu, Lingqi Yu, Hao Wang, Yuwen Feng, Lihong |
author_sort | Zhao, Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the pretreatment methods and sampling time on the sampling of airborne bacteria in hospitals. Methods for the pretreatment of Andersen samplers, namely, non-sterilized, 75% ethanol and autoclaving sampled for 5 min, 10 min and 15 min in the general ward and class 1000 clean operating department, respectively, were studied. Statistical analysis was used to compare the differences in sampling results of airborne bacteria under different pretreatment methods, sampling time and environmental conditions. In the first test, the sampling results of the airborne bacteria obtained by pretreatment of the sampler with 75% ethanol and without pre-treatment were not very different, and the sampling results showed a certain declining trend with the extension of the sampling time. In the second test, the pretreatment effect of autoclaving was significantly better than that of 75% ethanol, and the sampling time had no effect on the sampling results. After removing the influencing factors of the environment, the results were consistent with the results of the second test. It was observed that the Andersen samplers should not be pretreated with 75% ethanol before airborne microbes sampling. The pretreatment should be carried out by autoclaving, and the sampling time has little effect on the sampling results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10453-020-09668-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7781652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77816522021-01-05 Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes Zhao, Yan Zhang, Jingwei Wang, Shumei Yu, Lingqi Yu, Hao Wang, Yuwen Feng, Lihong Aerobiologia (Bologna) Original Paper The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the pretreatment methods and sampling time on the sampling of airborne bacteria in hospitals. Methods for the pretreatment of Andersen samplers, namely, non-sterilized, 75% ethanol and autoclaving sampled for 5 min, 10 min and 15 min in the general ward and class 1000 clean operating department, respectively, were studied. Statistical analysis was used to compare the differences in sampling results of airborne bacteria under different pretreatment methods, sampling time and environmental conditions. In the first test, the sampling results of the airborne bacteria obtained by pretreatment of the sampler with 75% ethanol and without pre-treatment were not very different, and the sampling results showed a certain declining trend with the extension of the sampling time. In the second test, the pretreatment effect of autoclaving was significantly better than that of 75% ethanol, and the sampling time had no effect on the sampling results. After removing the influencing factors of the environment, the results were consistent with the results of the second test. It was observed that the Andersen samplers should not be pretreated with 75% ethanol before airborne microbes sampling. The pretreatment should be carried out by autoclaving, and the sampling time has little effect on the sampling results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10453-020-09668-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2021-01-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7781652/ /pubmed/33424104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-020-09668-2 Text en © Springer Nature B.V. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Zhao, Yan Zhang, Jingwei Wang, Shumei Yu, Lingqi Yu, Hao Wang, Yuwen Feng, Lihong Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes |
title | Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes |
title_full | Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes |
title_short | Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes |
title_sort | efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7781652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-020-09668-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaoyan efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes AT zhangjingwei efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes AT wangshumei efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes AT yulingqi efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes AT yuhao efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes AT wangyuwen efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes AT fenglihong efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes |