Cargando…

Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the pretreatment methods and sampling time on the sampling of airborne bacteria in hospitals. Methods for the pretreatment of Andersen samplers, namely, non-sterilized, 75% ethanol and autoclaving sampled for 5 min, 10 min and 15 min in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yan, Zhang, Jingwei, Wang, Shumei, Yu, Lingqi, Yu, Hao, Wang, Yuwen, Feng, Lihong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7781652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-020-09668-2
_version_ 1783631719601012736
author Zhao, Yan
Zhang, Jingwei
Wang, Shumei
Yu, Lingqi
Yu, Hao
Wang, Yuwen
Feng, Lihong
author_facet Zhao, Yan
Zhang, Jingwei
Wang, Shumei
Yu, Lingqi
Yu, Hao
Wang, Yuwen
Feng, Lihong
author_sort Zhao, Yan
collection PubMed
description The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the pretreatment methods and sampling time on the sampling of airborne bacteria in hospitals. Methods for the pretreatment of Andersen samplers, namely, non-sterilized, 75% ethanol and autoclaving sampled for 5 min, 10 min and 15 min in the general ward and class 1000 clean operating department, respectively, were studied. Statistical analysis was used to compare the differences in sampling results of airborne bacteria under different pretreatment methods, sampling time and environmental conditions. In the first test, the sampling results of the airborne bacteria obtained by pretreatment of the sampler with 75% ethanol and without pre-treatment were not very different, and the sampling results showed a certain declining trend with the extension of the sampling time. In the second test, the pretreatment effect of autoclaving was significantly better than that of 75% ethanol, and the sampling time had no effect on the sampling results. After removing the influencing factors of the environment, the results were consistent with the results of the second test. It was observed that the Andersen samplers should not be pretreated with 75% ethanol before airborne microbes sampling. The pretreatment should be carried out by autoclaving, and the sampling time has little effect on the sampling results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10453-020-09668-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7781652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77816522021-01-05 Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes Zhao, Yan Zhang, Jingwei Wang, Shumei Yu, Lingqi Yu, Hao Wang, Yuwen Feng, Lihong Aerobiologia (Bologna) Original Paper The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the pretreatment methods and sampling time on the sampling of airborne bacteria in hospitals. Methods for the pretreatment of Andersen samplers, namely, non-sterilized, 75% ethanol and autoclaving sampled for 5 min, 10 min and 15 min in the general ward and class 1000 clean operating department, respectively, were studied. Statistical analysis was used to compare the differences in sampling results of airborne bacteria under different pretreatment methods, sampling time and environmental conditions. In the first test, the sampling results of the airborne bacteria obtained by pretreatment of the sampler with 75% ethanol and without pre-treatment were not very different, and the sampling results showed a certain declining trend with the extension of the sampling time. In the second test, the pretreatment effect of autoclaving was significantly better than that of 75% ethanol, and the sampling time had no effect on the sampling results. After removing the influencing factors of the environment, the results were consistent with the results of the second test. It was observed that the Andersen samplers should not be pretreated with 75% ethanol before airborne microbes sampling. The pretreatment should be carried out by autoclaving, and the sampling time has little effect on the sampling results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10453-020-09668-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2021-01-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7781652/ /pubmed/33424104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-020-09668-2 Text en © Springer Nature B.V. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Zhao, Yan
Zhang, Jingwei
Wang, Shumei
Yu, Lingqi
Yu, Hao
Wang, Yuwen
Feng, Lihong
Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes
title Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes
title_full Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes
title_fullStr Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes
title_short Efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the Andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes
title_sort efficacy of 75% alcohol in pretreatment of the andersen sampler in trapping maximum airborne microbes
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7781652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-020-09668-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyan efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes
AT zhangjingwei efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes
AT wangshumei efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes
AT yulingqi efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes
AT yuhao efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes
AT wangyuwen efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes
AT fenglihong efficacyof75alcoholinpretreatmentoftheandersensamplerintrappingmaximumairbornemicrobes