Cargando…
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of Mifepristone for Treatment of Low-Risk Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
PURPOSE: The effect of mifepristone for treatment of low-risk cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) was monitored by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS: Data were collected from 23 CSP patients with a 10-point risk score <5 (low-risk CSP) and from 23 intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) patients with a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7781728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3725353 |
_version_ | 1783631736291196928 |
---|---|
author | Xiong, Xi Gao, Chun-yan Ying, De-mei Yan, Ping Zhang, Zhi-jia Kuang, Na Tian, Hong-ju Luo, Li Long, Shu-yu Chen, Zheng-qiong |
author_facet | Xiong, Xi Gao, Chun-yan Ying, De-mei Yan, Ping Zhang, Zhi-jia Kuang, Na Tian, Hong-ju Luo, Li Long, Shu-yu Chen, Zheng-qiong |
author_sort | Xiong, Xi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The effect of mifepristone for treatment of low-risk cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) was monitored by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS: Data were collected from 23 CSP patients with a 10-point risk score <5 (low-risk CSP) and from 23 intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) patients with a scar from a previous cesarean delivery. All patients were prescribed 75 mg mifepristone daily for 2 days and underwent transvaginal CEUS before and after administration of mifepristone. On the third day, uterine curettage was performed after transvaginal CEUS. Arrival time (AT), peak intensity (PI), and area under the curve (AUC) around the gestational sac were monitored by CEUS before and after application of mifepristone, and the rate of effective treatment was compared between the two patient groups. RESULTS: No patients experienced side effects from either the CEUS procedure or the mifepristone treatment. Changes in AT, PI, and AUC index from before vs. after mifepristone treatment did not differ significantly between the two groups (all p values >0.05). There was also no significant difference in the rate of effective treatment between the two groups (95.65% in the CSP group vs. 100% in the IUP group; p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on monitoring by CEUS, the effect of mifepristone in low-risk CSP was comparable to that in IUP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7781728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77817282021-01-13 Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of Mifepristone for Treatment of Low-Risk Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Xiong, Xi Gao, Chun-yan Ying, De-mei Yan, Ping Zhang, Zhi-jia Kuang, Na Tian, Hong-ju Luo, Li Long, Shu-yu Chen, Zheng-qiong Contrast Media Mol Imaging Research Article PURPOSE: The effect of mifepristone for treatment of low-risk cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) was monitored by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS: Data were collected from 23 CSP patients with a 10-point risk score <5 (low-risk CSP) and from 23 intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) patients with a scar from a previous cesarean delivery. All patients were prescribed 75 mg mifepristone daily for 2 days and underwent transvaginal CEUS before and after administration of mifepristone. On the third day, uterine curettage was performed after transvaginal CEUS. Arrival time (AT), peak intensity (PI), and area under the curve (AUC) around the gestational sac were monitored by CEUS before and after application of mifepristone, and the rate of effective treatment was compared between the two patient groups. RESULTS: No patients experienced side effects from either the CEUS procedure or the mifepristone treatment. Changes in AT, PI, and AUC index from before vs. after mifepristone treatment did not differ significantly between the two groups (all p values >0.05). There was also no significant difference in the rate of effective treatment between the two groups (95.65% in the CSP group vs. 100% in the IUP group; p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on monitoring by CEUS, the effect of mifepristone in low-risk CSP was comparable to that in IUP. Hindawi 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7781728/ /pubmed/33447168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3725353 Text en Copyright © 2020 Xi Xiong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Xiong, Xi Gao, Chun-yan Ying, De-mei Yan, Ping Zhang, Zhi-jia Kuang, Na Tian, Hong-ju Luo, Li Long, Shu-yu Chen, Zheng-qiong Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of Mifepristone for Treatment of Low-Risk Cesarean Scar Pregnancy |
title | Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of Mifepristone for Treatment of Low-Risk Cesarean Scar Pregnancy |
title_full | Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of Mifepristone for Treatment of Low-Risk Cesarean Scar Pregnancy |
title_fullStr | Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of Mifepristone for Treatment of Low-Risk Cesarean Scar Pregnancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of Mifepristone for Treatment of Low-Risk Cesarean Scar Pregnancy |
title_short | Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of Mifepristone for Treatment of Low-Risk Cesarean Scar Pregnancy |
title_sort | contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation of mifepristone for treatment of low-risk cesarean scar pregnancy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7781728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3725353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiongxi contrastenhancedultrasoundevaluationofmifepristonefortreatmentoflowriskcesareanscarpregnancy AT gaochunyan contrastenhancedultrasoundevaluationofmifepristonefortreatmentoflowriskcesareanscarpregnancy AT yingdemei contrastenhancedultrasoundevaluationofmifepristonefortreatmentoflowriskcesareanscarpregnancy AT yanping contrastenhancedultrasoundevaluationofmifepristonefortreatmentoflowriskcesareanscarpregnancy AT zhangzhijia contrastenhancedultrasoundevaluationofmifepristonefortreatmentoflowriskcesareanscarpregnancy AT kuangna contrastenhancedultrasoundevaluationofmifepristonefortreatmentoflowriskcesareanscarpregnancy AT tianhongju contrastenhancedultrasoundevaluationofmifepristonefortreatmentoflowriskcesareanscarpregnancy AT luoli contrastenhancedultrasoundevaluationofmifepristonefortreatmentoflowriskcesareanscarpregnancy AT longshuyu contrastenhancedultrasoundevaluationofmifepristonefortreatmentoflowriskcesareanscarpregnancy AT chenzhengqiong contrastenhancedultrasoundevaluationofmifepristonefortreatmentoflowriskcesareanscarpregnancy |