Cargando…

Availability of point-of-care culture and microscopy in general practice - does it lead to more appropriate use of antibiotics in patients with suspected urinary tract infection?

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common condition in general practice, and urine culture can help reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions. In case of delay of the result, antibiotic treatment can be guided by one or more point-of-care (POC) tests. In Denmark, POC microscopy and P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holm, Anne, Siersma, Volkert, Bjerrum, Lars, Cordoba, Gloria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7781897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33356665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2020.1853697
_version_ 1783631773657202688
author Holm, Anne
Siersma, Volkert
Bjerrum, Lars
Cordoba, Gloria
author_facet Holm, Anne
Siersma, Volkert
Bjerrum, Lars
Cordoba, Gloria
author_sort Holm, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common condition in general practice, and urine culture can help reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions. In case of delay of the result, antibiotic treatment can be guided by one or more point-of-care (POC) tests. In Denmark, POC microscopy and POC urine culture are widely used for this purpose. OBJECTIVES: To investigate if availability of POC microscopy or POC culture in general practice was associated with a more appropriate treatment decision in patients with suspected UTI while waiting for the result from the microbiological laboratory. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted in 2016 in general practice in the Copenhagen area, Denmark. Data on all patients presenting in general practice with symptoms of UTI were registered anonymously and a urine sample was sent for culture at the microbiological laboratory. The association between the availability of POC tests and the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing was assessed with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Seventy-six general practices included 1545 patients (83% female); 71% received appropriate treatment in practices with POC culture available and 65% in practices without POC culture available (p = 0.042). Having a microscope available was not associated with more appropriate treatment (70% vs. 69%, p = 0.54). CONCLUSION: Availability of POC culture marginally increased appropriate treatment while waiting for the result from the microbiological laboratory. Practices should adopt a strategy where they either perform culture within the practice or send urine for culture at the microbiological laboratory. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02698332.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7781897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77818972021-01-14 Availability of point-of-care culture and microscopy in general practice - does it lead to more appropriate use of antibiotics in patients with suspected urinary tract infection? Holm, Anne Siersma, Volkert Bjerrum, Lars Cordoba, Gloria Eur J Gen Pract Original Article BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common condition in general practice, and urine culture can help reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions. In case of delay of the result, antibiotic treatment can be guided by one or more point-of-care (POC) tests. In Denmark, POC microscopy and POC urine culture are widely used for this purpose. OBJECTIVES: To investigate if availability of POC microscopy or POC culture in general practice was associated with a more appropriate treatment decision in patients with suspected UTI while waiting for the result from the microbiological laboratory. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted in 2016 in general practice in the Copenhagen area, Denmark. Data on all patients presenting in general practice with symptoms of UTI were registered anonymously and a urine sample was sent for culture at the microbiological laboratory. The association between the availability of POC tests and the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing was assessed with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Seventy-six general practices included 1545 patients (83% female); 71% received appropriate treatment in practices with POC culture available and 65% in practices without POC culture available (p = 0.042). Having a microscope available was not associated with more appropriate treatment (70% vs. 69%, p = 0.54). CONCLUSION: Availability of POC culture marginally increased appropriate treatment while waiting for the result from the microbiological laboratory. Practices should adopt a strategy where they either perform culture within the practice or send urine for culture at the microbiological laboratory. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02698332. Taylor & Francis 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7781897/ /pubmed/33356665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2020.1853697 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Holm, Anne
Siersma, Volkert
Bjerrum, Lars
Cordoba, Gloria
Availability of point-of-care culture and microscopy in general practice - does it lead to more appropriate use of antibiotics in patients with suspected urinary tract infection?
title Availability of point-of-care culture and microscopy in general practice - does it lead to more appropriate use of antibiotics in patients with suspected urinary tract infection?
title_full Availability of point-of-care culture and microscopy in general practice - does it lead to more appropriate use of antibiotics in patients with suspected urinary tract infection?
title_fullStr Availability of point-of-care culture and microscopy in general practice - does it lead to more appropriate use of antibiotics in patients with suspected urinary tract infection?
title_full_unstemmed Availability of point-of-care culture and microscopy in general practice - does it lead to more appropriate use of antibiotics in patients with suspected urinary tract infection?
title_short Availability of point-of-care culture and microscopy in general practice - does it lead to more appropriate use of antibiotics in patients with suspected urinary tract infection?
title_sort availability of point-of-care culture and microscopy in general practice - does it lead to more appropriate use of antibiotics in patients with suspected urinary tract infection?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7781897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33356665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2020.1853697
work_keys_str_mv AT holmanne availabilityofpointofcarecultureandmicroscopyingeneralpracticedoesitleadtomoreappropriateuseofantibioticsinpatientswithsuspectedurinarytractinfection
AT siersmavolkert availabilityofpointofcarecultureandmicroscopyingeneralpracticedoesitleadtomoreappropriateuseofantibioticsinpatientswithsuspectedurinarytractinfection
AT bjerrumlars availabilityofpointofcarecultureandmicroscopyingeneralpracticedoesitleadtomoreappropriateuseofantibioticsinpatientswithsuspectedurinarytractinfection
AT cordobagloria availabilityofpointofcarecultureandmicroscopyingeneralpracticedoesitleadtomoreappropriateuseofantibioticsinpatientswithsuspectedurinarytractinfection