Cargando…

Validation and initial results of surveys exploring perspectives on risks and solutions for diagnostic and medication errors in primary care in Sweden

OBJECTIVE: To (1) validate and (2) display initial results of surveys to health care professionals and patients on the importance and mitigation of specified risks for diagnostic and medication errors. DESIGN: For validation, psychometric properties were analysed by assessment of construct validity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernholm, Rita, Wachtler, Caroline, Malm-Willadsen, Karolina, Holzmann, Martin J., Carlsson, Axel C., Nilsson, Gunnar H., Pukk Härenstam, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33307931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1841531
_version_ 1783631803552104448
author Fernholm, Rita
Wachtler, Caroline
Malm-Willadsen, Karolina
Holzmann, Martin J.
Carlsson, Axel C.
Nilsson, Gunnar H.
Pukk Härenstam, Karin
author_facet Fernholm, Rita
Wachtler, Caroline
Malm-Willadsen, Karolina
Holzmann, Martin J.
Carlsson, Axel C.
Nilsson, Gunnar H.
Pukk Härenstam, Karin
author_sort Fernholm, Rita
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To (1) validate and (2) display initial results of surveys to health care professionals and patients on the importance and mitigation of specified risks for diagnostic and medication errors. DESIGN: For validation, psychometric properties were analysed by assessment of construct validity and internal consistency by factor analysis. Non-parametric analyses were used concerning areas of risk, and top ranking of solutions were reported descriptively. SETTING: Primary health care in Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: Health care professionals (HCPs); including physicians, nurses and practice managers, as well as patients who had experienced diagnostic or medication errors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychometric properties of the surveys. Median ratings for risks and top rankings of solutions for professionals and patients. RESULTS: There were 939 respondents to the HCP survey. Construct validity resulted in a model with four dimensions: Patient-provider level; Support systems for every day clinical work; Shared information and cooperation between different caregivers; Risks in the environment. Internal consistency was acceptable with Cronbach’s α values above 0.7. Confirmatory factor analysis generally showed an acceptable fit. Initial results from the professionals showed the importance of continuity of care, a nationwide on-line medical platform and cooperation in transfer of care. The patient survey could not be validated because of low response rate. CONCLUSION: The HCP survey showed some contradicting results regarding model fit and may be tentatively acceptable but validity needs further study. HCP survey answers indicated that relational continuity of care and a nationwide on-line medical platform are highly valued. CURRENT AWARENESS: Health care professionals and patients are rather untapped sources of knowledge regarding patient safety in primary health care: MAIN STATEMENTS: Validation is performed on a new survey capturing rating of risks and solutions. The validation of the health care professional survey is tentatively acceptable. Survey answers indicate that health care professionals’ and patients’ perspectives are complementary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7782021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77820212021-01-14 Validation and initial results of surveys exploring perspectives on risks and solutions for diagnostic and medication errors in primary care in Sweden Fernholm, Rita Wachtler, Caroline Malm-Willadsen, Karolina Holzmann, Martin J. Carlsson, Axel C. Nilsson, Gunnar H. Pukk Härenstam, Karin Scand J Prim Health Care Research Articles OBJECTIVE: To (1) validate and (2) display initial results of surveys to health care professionals and patients on the importance and mitigation of specified risks for diagnostic and medication errors. DESIGN: For validation, psychometric properties were analysed by assessment of construct validity and internal consistency by factor analysis. Non-parametric analyses were used concerning areas of risk, and top ranking of solutions were reported descriptively. SETTING: Primary health care in Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: Health care professionals (HCPs); including physicians, nurses and practice managers, as well as patients who had experienced diagnostic or medication errors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychometric properties of the surveys. Median ratings for risks and top rankings of solutions for professionals and patients. RESULTS: There were 939 respondents to the HCP survey. Construct validity resulted in a model with four dimensions: Patient-provider level; Support systems for every day clinical work; Shared information and cooperation between different caregivers; Risks in the environment. Internal consistency was acceptable with Cronbach’s α values above 0.7. Confirmatory factor analysis generally showed an acceptable fit. Initial results from the professionals showed the importance of continuity of care, a nationwide on-line medical platform and cooperation in transfer of care. The patient survey could not be validated because of low response rate. CONCLUSION: The HCP survey showed some contradicting results regarding model fit and may be tentatively acceptable but validity needs further study. HCP survey answers indicated that relational continuity of care and a nationwide on-line medical platform are highly valued. CURRENT AWARENESS: Health care professionals and patients are rather untapped sources of knowledge regarding patient safety in primary health care: MAIN STATEMENTS: Validation is performed on a new survey capturing rating of risks and solutions. The validation of the health care professional survey is tentatively acceptable. Survey answers indicate that health care professionals’ and patients’ perspectives are complementary. Taylor & Francis 2020-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7782021/ /pubmed/33307931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1841531 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Fernholm, Rita
Wachtler, Caroline
Malm-Willadsen, Karolina
Holzmann, Martin J.
Carlsson, Axel C.
Nilsson, Gunnar H.
Pukk Härenstam, Karin
Validation and initial results of surveys exploring perspectives on risks and solutions for diagnostic and medication errors in primary care in Sweden
title Validation and initial results of surveys exploring perspectives on risks and solutions for diagnostic and medication errors in primary care in Sweden
title_full Validation and initial results of surveys exploring perspectives on risks and solutions for diagnostic and medication errors in primary care in Sweden
title_fullStr Validation and initial results of surveys exploring perspectives on risks and solutions for diagnostic and medication errors in primary care in Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Validation and initial results of surveys exploring perspectives on risks and solutions for diagnostic and medication errors in primary care in Sweden
title_short Validation and initial results of surveys exploring perspectives on risks and solutions for diagnostic and medication errors in primary care in Sweden
title_sort validation and initial results of surveys exploring perspectives on risks and solutions for diagnostic and medication errors in primary care in sweden
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33307931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1841531
work_keys_str_mv AT fernholmrita validationandinitialresultsofsurveysexploringperspectivesonrisksandsolutionsfordiagnosticandmedicationerrorsinprimarycareinsweden
AT wachtlercaroline validationandinitialresultsofsurveysexploringperspectivesonrisksandsolutionsfordiagnosticandmedicationerrorsinprimarycareinsweden
AT malmwilladsenkarolina validationandinitialresultsofsurveysexploringperspectivesonrisksandsolutionsfordiagnosticandmedicationerrorsinprimarycareinsweden
AT holzmannmartinj validationandinitialresultsofsurveysexploringperspectivesonrisksandsolutionsfordiagnosticandmedicationerrorsinprimarycareinsweden
AT carlssonaxelc validationandinitialresultsofsurveysexploringperspectivesonrisksandsolutionsfordiagnosticandmedicationerrorsinprimarycareinsweden
AT nilssongunnarh validationandinitialresultsofsurveysexploringperspectivesonrisksandsolutionsfordiagnosticandmedicationerrorsinprimarycareinsweden
AT pukkharenstamkarin validationandinitialresultsofsurveysexploringperspectivesonrisksandsolutionsfordiagnosticandmedicationerrorsinprimarycareinsweden