Cargando…

Comparison of variant allele frequency and number of mutant molecules as units of measurement for circulating tumor DNA

Quantification of tumor‐specific variants (TSVs) in cell‐free DNA is rapidly evolving as a prognostic and predictive tool in patients with cancer. Currently, both variant allele frequency (VAF) and number of mutant molecules per mL plasma are used as units of measurement to report those TSVs. Howeve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bos, Manouk K., Nasserinejad, Kazem, Jansen, Maurice P. H. M., Angus, Lindsay, Atmodimedjo, Peggy N., de Jonge, Evert, Dinjens, Winand N. M., van Schaik, Ron H. N., Del Re, Marzia, Dubbink, Hendrikus J., Sleijfer, Stefan, Martens, John W. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33070443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12827
_version_ 1783631817024208896
author Bos, Manouk K.
Nasserinejad, Kazem
Jansen, Maurice P. H. M.
Angus, Lindsay
Atmodimedjo, Peggy N.
de Jonge, Evert
Dinjens, Winand N. M.
van Schaik, Ron H. N.
Del Re, Marzia
Dubbink, Hendrikus J.
Sleijfer, Stefan
Martens, John W. M.
author_facet Bos, Manouk K.
Nasserinejad, Kazem
Jansen, Maurice P. H. M.
Angus, Lindsay
Atmodimedjo, Peggy N.
de Jonge, Evert
Dinjens, Winand N. M.
van Schaik, Ron H. N.
Del Re, Marzia
Dubbink, Hendrikus J.
Sleijfer, Stefan
Martens, John W. M.
author_sort Bos, Manouk K.
collection PubMed
description Quantification of tumor‐specific variants (TSVs) in cell‐free DNA is rapidly evolving as a prognostic and predictive tool in patients with cancer. Currently, both variant allele frequency (VAF) and number of mutant molecules per mL plasma are used as units of measurement to report those TSVs. However, it is unknown to what extent both units of measurement agree and what are the factors underlying an existing disagreement. To study the agreement between VAF and mutant molecules in current clinical studies, we analyzed 1116 TSVs from 338 patients identified with next‐generation sequencing (NGS) or digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). On different study cohorts, a Deming regression analysis was performed and its 95% prediction interval was used as surrogate for the limits of agreement between VAF and number of mutant molecules per mL and to identify outliers. VAF and number of mutant molecules per mL plasma yielded greater agreement when using ddPCR than NGS. In case of discordance between VAF and number of mutant molecules per mL, insufficient molecular coverage in NGS and high cell‐free DNA concentration were the main responsible factors. We propose several optimization steps needed to bring monitoring of TSVs in cell‐free DNA to its full potential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7782075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77820752021-01-08 Comparison of variant allele frequency and number of mutant molecules as units of measurement for circulating tumor DNA Bos, Manouk K. Nasserinejad, Kazem Jansen, Maurice P. H. M. Angus, Lindsay Atmodimedjo, Peggy N. de Jonge, Evert Dinjens, Winand N. M. van Schaik, Ron H. N. Del Re, Marzia Dubbink, Hendrikus J. Sleijfer, Stefan Martens, John W. M. Mol Oncol Research Articles Quantification of tumor‐specific variants (TSVs) in cell‐free DNA is rapidly evolving as a prognostic and predictive tool in patients with cancer. Currently, both variant allele frequency (VAF) and number of mutant molecules per mL plasma are used as units of measurement to report those TSVs. However, it is unknown to what extent both units of measurement agree and what are the factors underlying an existing disagreement. To study the agreement between VAF and mutant molecules in current clinical studies, we analyzed 1116 TSVs from 338 patients identified with next‐generation sequencing (NGS) or digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). On different study cohorts, a Deming regression analysis was performed and its 95% prediction interval was used as surrogate for the limits of agreement between VAF and number of mutant molecules per mL and to identify outliers. VAF and number of mutant molecules per mL plasma yielded greater agreement when using ddPCR than NGS. In case of discordance between VAF and number of mutant molecules per mL, insufficient molecular coverage in NGS and high cell‐free DNA concentration were the main responsible factors. We propose several optimization steps needed to bring monitoring of TSVs in cell‐free DNA to its full potential. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-31 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7782075/ /pubmed/33070443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12827 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Molecular Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Bos, Manouk K.
Nasserinejad, Kazem
Jansen, Maurice P. H. M.
Angus, Lindsay
Atmodimedjo, Peggy N.
de Jonge, Evert
Dinjens, Winand N. M.
van Schaik, Ron H. N.
Del Re, Marzia
Dubbink, Hendrikus J.
Sleijfer, Stefan
Martens, John W. M.
Comparison of variant allele frequency and number of mutant molecules as units of measurement for circulating tumor DNA
title Comparison of variant allele frequency and number of mutant molecules as units of measurement for circulating tumor DNA
title_full Comparison of variant allele frequency and number of mutant molecules as units of measurement for circulating tumor DNA
title_fullStr Comparison of variant allele frequency and number of mutant molecules as units of measurement for circulating tumor DNA
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of variant allele frequency and number of mutant molecules as units of measurement for circulating tumor DNA
title_short Comparison of variant allele frequency and number of mutant molecules as units of measurement for circulating tumor DNA
title_sort comparison of variant allele frequency and number of mutant molecules as units of measurement for circulating tumor dna
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33070443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12827
work_keys_str_mv AT bosmanoukk comparisonofvariantallelefrequencyandnumberofmutantmoleculesasunitsofmeasurementforcirculatingtumordna
AT nasserinejadkazem comparisonofvariantallelefrequencyandnumberofmutantmoleculesasunitsofmeasurementforcirculatingtumordna
AT jansenmauricephm comparisonofvariantallelefrequencyandnumberofmutantmoleculesasunitsofmeasurementforcirculatingtumordna
AT anguslindsay comparisonofvariantallelefrequencyandnumberofmutantmoleculesasunitsofmeasurementforcirculatingtumordna
AT atmodimedjopeggyn comparisonofvariantallelefrequencyandnumberofmutantmoleculesasunitsofmeasurementforcirculatingtumordna
AT dejongeevert comparisonofvariantallelefrequencyandnumberofmutantmoleculesasunitsofmeasurementforcirculatingtumordna
AT dinjenswinandnm comparisonofvariantallelefrequencyandnumberofmutantmoleculesasunitsofmeasurementforcirculatingtumordna
AT vanschaikronhn comparisonofvariantallelefrequencyandnumberofmutantmoleculesasunitsofmeasurementforcirculatingtumordna
AT delremarzia comparisonofvariantallelefrequencyandnumberofmutantmoleculesasunitsofmeasurementforcirculatingtumordna
AT dubbinkhendrikusj comparisonofvariantallelefrequencyandnumberofmutantmoleculesasunitsofmeasurementforcirculatingtumordna
AT sleijferstefan comparisonofvariantallelefrequencyandnumberofmutantmoleculesasunitsofmeasurementforcirculatingtumordna
AT martensjohnwm comparisonofvariantallelefrequencyandnumberofmutantmoleculesasunitsofmeasurementforcirculatingtumordna