Cargando…
Patients’ experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome – a scoping mixed methods review
PURPOSE: The EU COST Action 15111 collaboration on myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) aims to assess current research and identify knowledge gaps in Europe. Presently, our purpose is to map the effects of non-pharmacological therapies (NPTs) for ME/CFS, and what patients fin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32432991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1764830 |
_version_ | 1783631876401922048 |
---|---|
author | Mengshoel, Anne Marit Helland, Ingrid Bergliot Meeus, Mira Castro-Marrero, Jesus Pheby, Derek Bolle Strand, Elin |
author_facet | Mengshoel, Anne Marit Helland, Ingrid Bergliot Meeus, Mira Castro-Marrero, Jesus Pheby, Derek Bolle Strand, Elin |
author_sort | Mengshoel, Anne Marit |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The EU COST Action 15111 collaboration on myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) aims to assess current research and identify knowledge gaps in Europe. Presently, our purpose is to map the effects of non-pharmacological therapies (NPTs) for ME/CFS, and what patients find important in the treatment process. METHODS: A scoping mixed methods literature review of European studies identified 16 papers fulfiling our inclusion criteria. The quantitative and qualitative studies were synthesized separately in tables. Additionally, extracts from the qualitative studies were subjected to translational analysis. RESULTS: Effect studies addressed cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT, n = 4), multimodal rehabilitation (n = 2) and activity-pacing (n = 2). CBT reduced fatigue scores more than usual care or waiting list controls. The effects of rehabilitation and activity-pacing were inconsistent. The contents, assessment methods and effects of rehabilitation and activity pacing studies varied. For patients, health professionals’ recognition of ME/CFS and support were crucial, but they expressed ambiguous experiences of what the NPTs entail. CONCLUSIONS: Methodological differences make comparisons across NPTs impossible, and from a patient perspective the relevance of the specific contents of NPTs are unclear. Future well-designed studies should focus on developing NPTs tailored to patients’ concerns and evaluation tools reflecting what is essential for patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7782327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77823272021-01-14 Patients’ experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome – a scoping mixed methods review Mengshoel, Anne Marit Helland, Ingrid Bergliot Meeus, Mira Castro-Marrero, Jesus Pheby, Derek Bolle Strand, Elin Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being Review Article PURPOSE: The EU COST Action 15111 collaboration on myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) aims to assess current research and identify knowledge gaps in Europe. Presently, our purpose is to map the effects of non-pharmacological therapies (NPTs) for ME/CFS, and what patients find important in the treatment process. METHODS: A scoping mixed methods literature review of European studies identified 16 papers fulfiling our inclusion criteria. The quantitative and qualitative studies were synthesized separately in tables. Additionally, extracts from the qualitative studies were subjected to translational analysis. RESULTS: Effect studies addressed cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT, n = 4), multimodal rehabilitation (n = 2) and activity-pacing (n = 2). CBT reduced fatigue scores more than usual care or waiting list controls. The effects of rehabilitation and activity-pacing were inconsistent. The contents, assessment methods and effects of rehabilitation and activity pacing studies varied. For patients, health professionals’ recognition of ME/CFS and support were crucial, but they expressed ambiguous experiences of what the NPTs entail. CONCLUSIONS: Methodological differences make comparisons across NPTs impossible, and from a patient perspective the relevance of the specific contents of NPTs are unclear. Future well-designed studies should focus on developing NPTs tailored to patients’ concerns and evaluation tools reflecting what is essential for patients. Taylor & Francis 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7782327/ /pubmed/32432991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1764830 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Mengshoel, Anne Marit Helland, Ingrid Bergliot Meeus, Mira Castro-Marrero, Jesus Pheby, Derek Bolle Strand, Elin Patients’ experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome – a scoping mixed methods review |
title | Patients’ experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome – a scoping mixed methods review |
title_full | Patients’ experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome – a scoping mixed methods review |
title_fullStr | Patients’ experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome – a scoping mixed methods review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients’ experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome – a scoping mixed methods review |
title_short | Patients’ experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome – a scoping mixed methods review |
title_sort | patients’ experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome – a scoping mixed methods review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32432991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1764830 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mengshoelannemarit patientsexperiencesandeffectsofnonpharmacologicaltreatmentformyalgicencephalomyelitischronicfatiguesyndromeascopingmixedmethodsreview AT hellandingridbergliot patientsexperiencesandeffectsofnonpharmacologicaltreatmentformyalgicencephalomyelitischronicfatiguesyndromeascopingmixedmethodsreview AT meeusmira patientsexperiencesandeffectsofnonpharmacologicaltreatmentformyalgicencephalomyelitischronicfatiguesyndromeascopingmixedmethodsreview AT castromarrerojesus patientsexperiencesandeffectsofnonpharmacologicaltreatmentformyalgicencephalomyelitischronicfatiguesyndromeascopingmixedmethodsreview AT phebyderek patientsexperiencesandeffectsofnonpharmacologicaltreatmentformyalgicencephalomyelitischronicfatiguesyndromeascopingmixedmethodsreview AT bollestrandelin patientsexperiencesandeffectsofnonpharmacologicaltreatmentformyalgicencephalomyelitischronicfatiguesyndromeascopingmixedmethodsreview |