Cargando…
Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4–14 months...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33393455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1861719 |
_version_ | 1783631883004805120 |
---|---|
author | Enthoven, Paul Eddeborn, Fredrik Abbott, Allan Schröder, Karin Fors, Maria Öberg, Birgitta |
author_facet | Enthoven, Paul Eddeborn, Fredrik Abbott, Allan Schröder, Karin Fors, Maria Öberg, Birgitta |
author_sort | Enthoven, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4–14 months after receiving treatment according to the BetterBack MoC for LBP in primary care in Sweden. Data were analysed using content analysis. Results: When analysing the data, the following theme emerged; “Participant understanding of their treatment for low back pain and self-management strategies—a matter of support systems”, comprising the following categories: “Knowledge translation”, “Interaction and dialogue”, “The health care professional support” and “Form organization”. Participants experienced that they had better knowledge about their LBP and received tools to better manage their health condition. The participants expressed good communication with the treating physiotherapist and provided suggestions to further improve the treatment of LBP. Conclusions: Participants experienced that they had gained new knowledge about their health problems and after the treatment they had the tools to handle their back problems. This suggests that the BetterBack MoC may be used as a basis for a support system to provide valuable tools for self-management for patients with low back pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7782354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77823542021-01-14 Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study Enthoven, Paul Eddeborn, Fredrik Abbott, Allan Schröder, Karin Fors, Maria Öberg, Birgitta Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being Empirical Studies Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4–14 months after receiving treatment according to the BetterBack MoC for LBP in primary care in Sweden. Data were analysed using content analysis. Results: When analysing the data, the following theme emerged; “Participant understanding of their treatment for low back pain and self-management strategies—a matter of support systems”, comprising the following categories: “Knowledge translation”, “Interaction and dialogue”, “The health care professional support” and “Form organization”. Participants experienced that they had better knowledge about their LBP and received tools to better manage their health condition. The participants expressed good communication with the treating physiotherapist and provided suggestions to further improve the treatment of LBP. Conclusions: Participants experienced that they had gained new knowledge about their health problems and after the treatment they had the tools to handle their back problems. This suggests that the BetterBack MoC may be used as a basis for a support system to provide valuable tools for self-management for patients with low back pain. Taylor & Francis 2021-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7782354/ /pubmed/33393455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1861719 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Empirical Studies Enthoven, Paul Eddeborn, Fredrik Abbott, Allan Schröder, Karin Fors, Maria Öberg, Birgitta Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study |
title | Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study |
title_full | Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study |
title_fullStr | Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study |
title_short | Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study |
title_sort | patients’ experiences of the betterback model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study |
topic | Empirical Studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33393455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1861719 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT enthovenpaul patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT eddebornfredrik patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT abbottallan patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT schroderkarin patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT forsmaria patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT obergbirgitta patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy |