Cargando…

Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study

Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4–14 months...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Enthoven, Paul, Eddeborn, Fredrik, Abbott, Allan, Schröder, Karin, Fors, Maria, Öberg, Birgitta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33393455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1861719
_version_ 1783631883004805120
author Enthoven, Paul
Eddeborn, Fredrik
Abbott, Allan
Schröder, Karin
Fors, Maria
Öberg, Birgitta
author_facet Enthoven, Paul
Eddeborn, Fredrik
Abbott, Allan
Schröder, Karin
Fors, Maria
Öberg, Birgitta
author_sort Enthoven, Paul
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4–14 months after receiving treatment according to the BetterBack MoC for LBP in primary care in Sweden. Data were analysed using content analysis. Results: When analysing the data, the following theme emerged; “Participant understanding of their treatment for low back pain and self-management strategies—a matter of support systems”, comprising the following categories: “Knowledge translation”, “Interaction and dialogue”, “The health care professional support” and “Form organization”. Participants experienced that they had better knowledge about their LBP and received tools to better manage their health condition. The participants expressed good communication with the treating physiotherapist and provided suggestions to further improve the treatment of LBP. Conclusions: Participants experienced that they had gained new knowledge about their health problems and after the treatment they had the tools to handle their back problems. This suggests that the BetterBack MoC may be used as a basis for a support system to provide valuable tools for self-management for patients with low back pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7782354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77823542021-01-14 Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study Enthoven, Paul Eddeborn, Fredrik Abbott, Allan Schröder, Karin Fors, Maria Öberg, Birgitta Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being Empirical Studies Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4–14 months after receiving treatment according to the BetterBack MoC for LBP in primary care in Sweden. Data were analysed using content analysis. Results: When analysing the data, the following theme emerged; “Participant understanding of their treatment for low back pain and self-management strategies—a matter of support systems”, comprising the following categories: “Knowledge translation”, “Interaction and dialogue”, “The health care professional support” and “Form organization”. Participants experienced that they had better knowledge about their LBP and received tools to better manage their health condition. The participants expressed good communication with the treating physiotherapist and provided suggestions to further improve the treatment of LBP. Conclusions: Participants experienced that they had gained new knowledge about their health problems and after the treatment they had the tools to handle their back problems. This suggests that the BetterBack MoC may be used as a basis for a support system to provide valuable tools for self-management for patients with low back pain. Taylor & Francis 2021-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7782354/ /pubmed/33393455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1861719 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Empirical Studies
Enthoven, Paul
Eddeborn, Fredrik
Abbott, Allan
Schröder, Karin
Fors, Maria
Öberg, Birgitta
Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
title Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
title_full Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
title_short Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
title_sort patients’ experiences of the betterback model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
topic Empirical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33393455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1861719
work_keys_str_mv AT enthovenpaul patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT eddebornfredrik patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT abbottallan patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT schroderkarin patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT forsmaria patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT obergbirgitta patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy