Cargando…
Paediatric femur fractures—the value of contextual information on judgement in possible child abuse cases: are we bias?
The majority of paediatric femur fractures result from accidental trauma; however, it is important to consider non-accidental trauma, especially in pre-ambulatory children. We study whether irrelevant contextual information subconsciously influences conclusions of healthcare professionals with respe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32556507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03704-6 |
_version_ | 1783631888755195904 |
---|---|
author | Loos, Marie-Louise H. J. Allema, Wies M. Bakx, Roel Stoel, Reinoud D. van Rijn, Rick R. Karst, Wouter A. |
author_facet | Loos, Marie-Louise H. J. Allema, Wies M. Bakx, Roel Stoel, Reinoud D. van Rijn, Rick R. Karst, Wouter A. |
author_sort | Loos, Marie-Louise H. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The majority of paediatric femur fractures result from accidental trauma; however, it is important to consider non-accidental trauma, especially in pre-ambulatory children. We study whether irrelevant contextual information subconsciously influences conclusions of healthcare professionals with respect to whether observations provide evidence for non-accidental trauma. A survey with nine radiographs of femur shaft fractures was designed. Two different clinical histories (vignettes) with contextual information were designed, non-abuse versus abuse context. One of both vignettes was randomly assigned to the radiograph shown to the participant, followed by a question with a 5-point answer scale, which represents a verbal expression of the likelihood ratio of the fracture regarding a non-accidental versus accidental cause. Participants were medical residents and staff members of different specialties from several Dutch hospitals. A total of 172 participants responded. The reported evidential strength of the vignettes with a non-abuse context was 0.19 (n = 784; 95%CI 0.10–0.28) and for the abuse context 0.94 (n = 764; 95%CI 0.86–1.02; p < 0.001). Women reported a stronger evidential strength than men, but both were influenced by context. Emergency department and paediatric doctors were more likely to decide that non-accidental trauma was the cause; paediatric radiologists were the least likely. Experience in years of practice and current function did not prevent participants from being bias. Conclusion: This study shows that the interpretation of medical results by healthcare professionals can be influenced by contextual information, such as low income and marital status, which are irrelevant to the decision as to whether abuse might have occurred. Given the same information about an injury, women, emergency department and paediatric doctors were more likely to decide that non-accidental trauma was the cause, while paediatric radiologists were least likely to decide this outcome. It is important to prevent contextual influence as much as possible, by recognizing it and implementing a management contextual information procedure. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00431-020-03704-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7782380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77823802021-01-11 Paediatric femur fractures—the value of contextual information on judgement in possible child abuse cases: are we bias? Loos, Marie-Louise H. J. Allema, Wies M. Bakx, Roel Stoel, Reinoud D. van Rijn, Rick R. Karst, Wouter A. Eur J Pediatr Original Article The majority of paediatric femur fractures result from accidental trauma; however, it is important to consider non-accidental trauma, especially in pre-ambulatory children. We study whether irrelevant contextual information subconsciously influences conclusions of healthcare professionals with respect to whether observations provide evidence for non-accidental trauma. A survey with nine radiographs of femur shaft fractures was designed. Two different clinical histories (vignettes) with contextual information were designed, non-abuse versus abuse context. One of both vignettes was randomly assigned to the radiograph shown to the participant, followed by a question with a 5-point answer scale, which represents a verbal expression of the likelihood ratio of the fracture regarding a non-accidental versus accidental cause. Participants were medical residents and staff members of different specialties from several Dutch hospitals. A total of 172 participants responded. The reported evidential strength of the vignettes with a non-abuse context was 0.19 (n = 784; 95%CI 0.10–0.28) and for the abuse context 0.94 (n = 764; 95%CI 0.86–1.02; p < 0.001). Women reported a stronger evidential strength than men, but both were influenced by context. Emergency department and paediatric doctors were more likely to decide that non-accidental trauma was the cause; paediatric radiologists were the least likely. Experience in years of practice and current function did not prevent participants from being bias. Conclusion: This study shows that the interpretation of medical results by healthcare professionals can be influenced by contextual information, such as low income and marital status, which are irrelevant to the decision as to whether abuse might have occurred. Given the same information about an injury, women, emergency department and paediatric doctors were more likely to decide that non-accidental trauma was the cause, while paediatric radiologists were least likely to decide this outcome. It is important to prevent contextual influence as much as possible, by recognizing it and implementing a management contextual information procedure. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00431-020-03704-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-06-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7782380/ /pubmed/32556507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03704-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Loos, Marie-Louise H. J. Allema, Wies M. Bakx, Roel Stoel, Reinoud D. van Rijn, Rick R. Karst, Wouter A. Paediatric femur fractures—the value of contextual information on judgement in possible child abuse cases: are we bias? |
title | Paediatric femur fractures—the value of contextual information on judgement in possible child abuse cases: are we bias? |
title_full | Paediatric femur fractures—the value of contextual information on judgement in possible child abuse cases: are we bias? |
title_fullStr | Paediatric femur fractures—the value of contextual information on judgement in possible child abuse cases: are we bias? |
title_full_unstemmed | Paediatric femur fractures—the value of contextual information on judgement in possible child abuse cases: are we bias? |
title_short | Paediatric femur fractures—the value of contextual information on judgement in possible child abuse cases: are we bias? |
title_sort | paediatric femur fractures—the value of contextual information on judgement in possible child abuse cases: are we bias? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32556507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03704-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loosmarielouisehj paediatricfemurfracturesthevalueofcontextualinformationonjudgementinpossiblechildabusecasesarewebias AT allemawiesm paediatricfemurfracturesthevalueofcontextualinformationonjudgementinpossiblechildabusecasesarewebias AT bakxroel paediatricfemurfracturesthevalueofcontextualinformationonjudgementinpossiblechildabusecasesarewebias AT stoelreinoudd paediatricfemurfracturesthevalueofcontextualinformationonjudgementinpossiblechildabusecasesarewebias AT vanrijnrickr paediatricfemurfracturesthevalueofcontextualinformationonjudgementinpossiblechildabusecasesarewebias AT karstwoutera paediatricfemurfracturesthevalueofcontextualinformationonjudgementinpossiblechildabusecasesarewebias |