Cargando…
Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study
PURPOSE: The German Classification of Diverticular Disease was introduced a few years ago. The aim of this study was to determine whether Classification of Diverticular Disease enables an exact stratification of different types of diverticular disease in terms of course and treatment. METHODS: This...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32886196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03721-9 |
_version_ | 1783631902336352256 |
---|---|
author | Lauscher, Johannes C. Lock, Johan F. Aschenbrenner, Katja Strobel, Rahel M. Leonhardt, Marja Stroux, Andrea Weixler, Benjamin Germer, Christoph-Thomas Kreis, Martin E. |
author_facet | Lauscher, Johannes C. Lock, Johan F. Aschenbrenner, Katja Strobel, Rahel M. Leonhardt, Marja Stroux, Andrea Weixler, Benjamin Germer, Christoph-Thomas Kreis, Martin E. |
author_sort | Lauscher, Johannes C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The German Classification of Diverticular Disease was introduced a few years ago. The aim of this study was to determine whether Classification of Diverticular Disease enables an exact stratification of different types of diverticular disease in terms of course and treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective, bicentric observational trial. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with diverticular disease were prospectively included. The primary endpoint was the rate of recurrence within 2 year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, Quality of life measured by SF-36, frequency of gastrointestinal complaints, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were included. After conservative management, 40% of patients required surgery for recurrence in type 1b vs. 80% in type 2a/b (p = 0.04). Sixty percent of patients with type 2a (micro-abscess) were in need of surgery for recurrence vs. 100% of patients with type 2b (macro-abscess) (p = 0.11). Patients with type 2a reached 123 ± 15 points in the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index compared with 111 ± 14 in type 2b (p = 0.05) and higher scores in the “Mental Component Summary” scale of SF-36 (52 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 13; p = 0.04). Patients with recurrent diverticulitis without complications (type 3b) had less often painful constipation (30% vs. 73%; p = 0.006) when they were operated compared with conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: Differentiation into type 2a and 2b based on abscess size seems reasonable as patients with type 2b required surgery while patients with type 2a may be treated conservatively. Sigmoid colectomy in patients with type 3b seems to have gastrointestinal complaints during long-term follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.drks.de ID: DRKS00005576 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7782437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77824372021-01-11 Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study Lauscher, Johannes C. Lock, Johan F. Aschenbrenner, Katja Strobel, Rahel M. Leonhardt, Marja Stroux, Andrea Weixler, Benjamin Germer, Christoph-Thomas Kreis, Martin E. Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article PURPOSE: The German Classification of Diverticular Disease was introduced a few years ago. The aim of this study was to determine whether Classification of Diverticular Disease enables an exact stratification of different types of diverticular disease in terms of course and treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective, bicentric observational trial. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with diverticular disease were prospectively included. The primary endpoint was the rate of recurrence within 2 year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, Quality of life measured by SF-36, frequency of gastrointestinal complaints, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were included. After conservative management, 40% of patients required surgery for recurrence in type 1b vs. 80% in type 2a/b (p = 0.04). Sixty percent of patients with type 2a (micro-abscess) were in need of surgery for recurrence vs. 100% of patients with type 2b (macro-abscess) (p = 0.11). Patients with type 2a reached 123 ± 15 points in the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index compared with 111 ± 14 in type 2b (p = 0.05) and higher scores in the “Mental Component Summary” scale of SF-36 (52 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 13; p = 0.04). Patients with recurrent diverticulitis without complications (type 3b) had less often painful constipation (30% vs. 73%; p = 0.006) when they were operated compared with conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: Differentiation into type 2a and 2b based on abscess size seems reasonable as patients with type 2b required surgery while patients with type 2a may be treated conservatively. Sigmoid colectomy in patients with type 3b seems to have gastrointestinal complaints during long-term follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.drks.de ID: DRKS00005576 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7782437/ /pubmed/32886196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03721-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lauscher, Johannes C. Lock, Johan F. Aschenbrenner, Katja Strobel, Rahel M. Leonhardt, Marja Stroux, Andrea Weixler, Benjamin Germer, Christoph-Thomas Kreis, Martin E. Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study |
title | Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study |
title_full | Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study |
title_fullStr | Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study |
title_short | Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study |
title_sort | validation of the german classification of diverticular disease (vadis)—a prospective bicentric observational study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32886196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03721-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lauscherjohannesc validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy AT lockjohanf validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy AT aschenbrennerkatja validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy AT strobelrahelm validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy AT leonhardtmarja validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy AT strouxandrea validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy AT weixlerbenjamin validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy AT germerchristophthomas validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy AT kreismartine validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy |