Cargando…

Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study

PURPOSE: The German Classification of Diverticular Disease was introduced a few years ago. The aim of this study was to determine whether Classification of Diverticular Disease enables an exact stratification of different types of diverticular disease in terms of course and treatment. METHODS: This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lauscher, Johannes C., Lock, Johan F., Aschenbrenner, Katja, Strobel, Rahel M., Leonhardt, Marja, Stroux, Andrea, Weixler, Benjamin, Germer, Christoph-Thomas, Kreis, Martin E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32886196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03721-9
_version_ 1783631902336352256
author Lauscher, Johannes C.
Lock, Johan F.
Aschenbrenner, Katja
Strobel, Rahel M.
Leonhardt, Marja
Stroux, Andrea
Weixler, Benjamin
Germer, Christoph-Thomas
Kreis, Martin E.
author_facet Lauscher, Johannes C.
Lock, Johan F.
Aschenbrenner, Katja
Strobel, Rahel M.
Leonhardt, Marja
Stroux, Andrea
Weixler, Benjamin
Germer, Christoph-Thomas
Kreis, Martin E.
author_sort Lauscher, Johannes C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The German Classification of Diverticular Disease was introduced a few years ago. The aim of this study was to determine whether Classification of Diverticular Disease enables an exact stratification of different types of diverticular disease in terms of course and treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective, bicentric observational trial. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with diverticular disease were prospectively included. The primary endpoint was the rate of recurrence within 2 year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, Quality of life measured by SF-36, frequency of gastrointestinal complaints, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were included. After conservative management, 40% of patients required surgery for recurrence in type 1b vs. 80% in type 2a/b (p = 0.04). Sixty percent of patients with type 2a (micro-abscess) were in need of surgery for recurrence vs. 100% of patients with type 2b (macro-abscess) (p = 0.11). Patients with type 2a reached 123 ± 15 points in the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index compared with 111 ± 14 in type 2b (p = 0.05) and higher scores in the “Mental Component Summary” scale of SF-36 (52 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 13; p = 0.04). Patients with recurrent diverticulitis without complications (type 3b) had less often painful constipation (30% vs. 73%; p = 0.006) when they were operated compared with conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: Differentiation into type 2a and 2b based on abscess size seems reasonable as patients with type 2b required surgery while patients with type 2a may be treated conservatively. Sigmoid colectomy in patients with type 3b seems to have gastrointestinal complaints during long-term follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.drks.de ID: DRKS00005576
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7782437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77824372021-01-11 Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study Lauscher, Johannes C. Lock, Johan F. Aschenbrenner, Katja Strobel, Rahel M. Leonhardt, Marja Stroux, Andrea Weixler, Benjamin Germer, Christoph-Thomas Kreis, Martin E. Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article PURPOSE: The German Classification of Diverticular Disease was introduced a few years ago. The aim of this study was to determine whether Classification of Diverticular Disease enables an exact stratification of different types of diverticular disease in terms of course and treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective, bicentric observational trial. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with diverticular disease were prospectively included. The primary endpoint was the rate of recurrence within 2 year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, Quality of life measured by SF-36, frequency of gastrointestinal complaints, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were included. After conservative management, 40% of patients required surgery for recurrence in type 1b vs. 80% in type 2a/b (p = 0.04). Sixty percent of patients with type 2a (micro-abscess) were in need of surgery for recurrence vs. 100% of patients with type 2b (macro-abscess) (p = 0.11). Patients with type 2a reached 123 ± 15 points in the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index compared with 111 ± 14 in type 2b (p = 0.05) and higher scores in the “Mental Component Summary” scale of SF-36 (52 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 13; p = 0.04). Patients with recurrent diverticulitis without complications (type 3b) had less often painful constipation (30% vs. 73%; p = 0.006) when they were operated compared with conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: Differentiation into type 2a and 2b based on abscess size seems reasonable as patients with type 2b required surgery while patients with type 2a may be treated conservatively. Sigmoid colectomy in patients with type 3b seems to have gastrointestinal complaints during long-term follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.drks.de ID: DRKS00005576 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7782437/ /pubmed/32886196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03721-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lauscher, Johannes C.
Lock, Johan F.
Aschenbrenner, Katja
Strobel, Rahel M.
Leonhardt, Marja
Stroux, Andrea
Weixler, Benjamin
Germer, Christoph-Thomas
Kreis, Martin E.
Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study
title Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study
title_full Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study
title_fullStr Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study
title_short Validation of the German Classification of Diverticular Disease (VADIS)—a prospective bicentric observational study
title_sort validation of the german classification of diverticular disease (vadis)—a prospective bicentric observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32886196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03721-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lauscherjohannesc validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy
AT lockjohanf validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy
AT aschenbrennerkatja validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy
AT strobelrahelm validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy
AT leonhardtmarja validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy
AT strouxandrea validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy
AT weixlerbenjamin validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy
AT germerchristophthomas validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy
AT kreismartine validationofthegermanclassificationofdiverticulardiseasevadisaprospectivebicentricobservationalstudy