Cargando…
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuroendocrine tumour services in England
PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been particular concerns regarding the related impact on specialist tumour services. Neuroendocrine tumour (NET) services are delivered in a highly specialised setting, typically delivered in a small number of centres that fulfil specific criteria as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33400173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02564-2 |
_version_ | 1783631932100182016 |
---|---|
author | Weickert, Martin O. Robbins, Tim Kyrou, Ioannis Hopper, Adam Pearson, Eilish Barber, Thomas M. Kaltsas, Gregory Randeva, Harpal S. |
author_facet | Weickert, Martin O. Robbins, Tim Kyrou, Ioannis Hopper, Adam Pearson, Eilish Barber, Thomas M. Kaltsas, Gregory Randeva, Harpal S. |
author_sort | Weickert, Martin O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been particular concerns regarding the related impact on specialist tumour services. Neuroendocrine tumour (NET) services are delivered in a highly specialised setting, typically delivered in a small number of centres that fulfil specific criteria as defined by the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS). We aimed to address the COVID-19-related impact on specialist NET tumour services in England and other countries. METHODS: Electronic survey addressing patient access and delivery of care distributed to all ENETS Centres of Excellence (CoE) in England and matching number of ENETS CoE elsewhere. Semi-quantitative and qualitative analyses of survey responses were performed. RESULTS: Survey response of ENETS CoE in England was 55% (6/11). Responses from six non-UK ENETS CoE elsewhere were received and analysed in a similar manner. Relevant disruption of various NET services was noted across all responding Centres, which included delayed patient appointments and investigations, reduced availability of treatment modalities including delayed surgical treatment and a major negative impact on research activities. The comparison between English and non-UK ENETS CoE suggested that the former had significantly greater concerns related to future research funding (p = 0.014), whilst having less disruption to multidisciplinary meetings (p = 0.01). A trend was also noted towards virtual patient appointments in ENETS CoE in England vs. elsewhere (p = 0.092). CONCLUSIONS: Restoration of highly specialised NET services following COVID-19 and planning for future service delivery and research funding must take account of the severe challenges encountered during the pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7782563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77825632021-01-05 Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuroendocrine tumour services in England Weickert, Martin O. Robbins, Tim Kyrou, Ioannis Hopper, Adam Pearson, Eilish Barber, Thomas M. Kaltsas, Gregory Randeva, Harpal S. Endocrine Original Article PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been particular concerns regarding the related impact on specialist tumour services. Neuroendocrine tumour (NET) services are delivered in a highly specialised setting, typically delivered in a small number of centres that fulfil specific criteria as defined by the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS). We aimed to address the COVID-19-related impact on specialist NET tumour services in England and other countries. METHODS: Electronic survey addressing patient access and delivery of care distributed to all ENETS Centres of Excellence (CoE) in England and matching number of ENETS CoE elsewhere. Semi-quantitative and qualitative analyses of survey responses were performed. RESULTS: Survey response of ENETS CoE in England was 55% (6/11). Responses from six non-UK ENETS CoE elsewhere were received and analysed in a similar manner. Relevant disruption of various NET services was noted across all responding Centres, which included delayed patient appointments and investigations, reduced availability of treatment modalities including delayed surgical treatment and a major negative impact on research activities. The comparison between English and non-UK ENETS CoE suggested that the former had significantly greater concerns related to future research funding (p = 0.014), whilst having less disruption to multidisciplinary meetings (p = 0.01). A trend was also noted towards virtual patient appointments in ENETS CoE in England vs. elsewhere (p = 0.092). CONCLUSIONS: Restoration of highly specialised NET services following COVID-19 and planning for future service delivery and research funding must take account of the severe challenges encountered during the pandemic. Springer US 2021-01-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7782563/ /pubmed/33400173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02564-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Weickert, Martin O. Robbins, Tim Kyrou, Ioannis Hopper, Adam Pearson, Eilish Barber, Thomas M. Kaltsas, Gregory Randeva, Harpal S. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuroendocrine tumour services in England |
title | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuroendocrine tumour services in England |
title_full | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuroendocrine tumour services in England |
title_fullStr | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuroendocrine tumour services in England |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuroendocrine tumour services in England |
title_short | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuroendocrine tumour services in England |
title_sort | impact of the covid-19 pandemic on neuroendocrine tumour services in england |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33400173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02564-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weickertmartino impactofthecovid19pandemiconneuroendocrinetumourservicesinengland AT robbinstim impactofthecovid19pandemiconneuroendocrinetumourservicesinengland AT kyrouioannis impactofthecovid19pandemiconneuroendocrinetumourservicesinengland AT hopperadam impactofthecovid19pandemiconneuroendocrinetumourservicesinengland AT pearsoneilish impactofthecovid19pandemiconneuroendocrinetumourservicesinengland AT barberthomasm impactofthecovid19pandemiconneuroendocrinetumourservicesinengland AT kaltsasgregory impactofthecovid19pandemiconneuroendocrinetumourservicesinengland AT randevaharpals impactofthecovid19pandemiconneuroendocrinetumourservicesinengland |