Cargando…

A patient-specific 3D model of the knee to compare the femoral rollback before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is nowadays performed as a standard procedure on a large number of patients suffering from arthrosis. Replacing the knee joint causes changes in the geometry and kinematics of the knee, which are unique to each individual. This research focuses on the method to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mercader, Alexandra, Röttinger, Timon, Bigdeli, Amir, Lüth, Tim C., Röttinger, Heinz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33394191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00319-6
_version_ 1783631940505567232
author Mercader, Alexandra
Röttinger, Timon
Bigdeli, Amir
Lüth, Tim C.
Röttinger, Heinz
author_facet Mercader, Alexandra
Röttinger, Timon
Bigdeli, Amir
Lüth, Tim C.
Röttinger, Heinz
author_sort Mercader, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is nowadays performed as a standard procedure on a large number of patients suffering from arthrosis. Replacing the knee joint causes changes in the geometry and kinematics of the knee, which are unique to each individual. This research focuses on the method to detect these changes after TKA and on the impact on the knee movement. This approach could reduce complications in patients with post-operative pain and reduce the number of revisions. METHODS: A 3D model of a patient’s knee was made by measuring the movement with a medically certified infrared stereo camera. This measurement was combined with the 3D model of the patient’s bones, previously segmented from the CT scan. This model is printed in 3D, one part being the mechanism that follows the movement of the patient, and the other part being the 3D copy of the femur and tibia bones. The knee replacement operation is performed directly on the model and the resulting rollback is being measured before and after TKA. RESULTS: We observe a difference in the rollback before and after TKA on the 3D printed model. The variation in size and shape of the femoral implant compared to the natural femur condyles is one of the reasons for the changes in the rollback effect. The rollback is half as large after the prosthesis insertion, which confirms the fact that the femoral prosthesis geometry influences the knee kinematics. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a first 3D model combining the patient-specific kinematic and the geometry of his bones has been constructed. This model allows the surgeon to validate the plan of the operation, but also to understand the problems and consequences generated by the prosthesis insertion. The rollback is one of the most important motion of the knee joint and this behavior could be quantified, providing comparative analysis of the knee joint before and after the operation. As a future study, the model could be used to analyse more parameters of the TKA such as the impact of different implantation methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40634-020-00319-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7782601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77826012021-01-14 A patient-specific 3D model of the knee to compare the femoral rollback before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) Mercader, Alexandra Röttinger, Timon Bigdeli, Amir Lüth, Tim C. Röttinger, Heinz J Exp Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is nowadays performed as a standard procedure on a large number of patients suffering from arthrosis. Replacing the knee joint causes changes in the geometry and kinematics of the knee, which are unique to each individual. This research focuses on the method to detect these changes after TKA and on the impact on the knee movement. This approach could reduce complications in patients with post-operative pain and reduce the number of revisions. METHODS: A 3D model of a patient’s knee was made by measuring the movement with a medically certified infrared stereo camera. This measurement was combined with the 3D model of the patient’s bones, previously segmented from the CT scan. This model is printed in 3D, one part being the mechanism that follows the movement of the patient, and the other part being the 3D copy of the femur and tibia bones. The knee replacement operation is performed directly on the model and the resulting rollback is being measured before and after TKA. RESULTS: We observe a difference in the rollback before and after TKA on the 3D printed model. The variation in size and shape of the femoral implant compared to the natural femur condyles is one of the reasons for the changes in the rollback effect. The rollback is half as large after the prosthesis insertion, which confirms the fact that the femoral prosthesis geometry influences the knee kinematics. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a first 3D model combining the patient-specific kinematic and the geometry of his bones has been constructed. This model allows the surgeon to validate the plan of the operation, but also to understand the problems and consequences generated by the prosthesis insertion. The rollback is one of the most important motion of the knee joint and this behavior could be quantified, providing comparative analysis of the knee joint before and after the operation. As a future study, the model could be used to analyse more parameters of the TKA such as the impact of different implantation methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40634-020-00319-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7782601/ /pubmed/33394191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00319-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Mercader, Alexandra
Röttinger, Timon
Bigdeli, Amir
Lüth, Tim C.
Röttinger, Heinz
A patient-specific 3D model of the knee to compare the femoral rollback before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
title A patient-specific 3D model of the knee to compare the femoral rollback before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
title_full A patient-specific 3D model of the knee to compare the femoral rollback before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
title_fullStr A patient-specific 3D model of the knee to compare the femoral rollback before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
title_full_unstemmed A patient-specific 3D model of the knee to compare the femoral rollback before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
title_short A patient-specific 3D model of the knee to compare the femoral rollback before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
title_sort patient-specific 3d model of the knee to compare the femoral rollback before and after total knee arthroplasty (tka)
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33394191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00319-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mercaderalexandra apatientspecific3dmodelofthekneetocomparethefemoralrollbackbeforeandaftertotalkneearthroplastytka
AT rottingertimon apatientspecific3dmodelofthekneetocomparethefemoralrollbackbeforeandaftertotalkneearthroplastytka
AT bigdeliamir apatientspecific3dmodelofthekneetocomparethefemoralrollbackbeforeandaftertotalkneearthroplastytka
AT luthtimc apatientspecific3dmodelofthekneetocomparethefemoralrollbackbeforeandaftertotalkneearthroplastytka
AT rottingerheinz apatientspecific3dmodelofthekneetocomparethefemoralrollbackbeforeandaftertotalkneearthroplastytka
AT mercaderalexandra patientspecific3dmodelofthekneetocomparethefemoralrollbackbeforeandaftertotalkneearthroplastytka
AT rottingertimon patientspecific3dmodelofthekneetocomparethefemoralrollbackbeforeandaftertotalkneearthroplastytka
AT bigdeliamir patientspecific3dmodelofthekneetocomparethefemoralrollbackbeforeandaftertotalkneearthroplastytka
AT luthtimc patientspecific3dmodelofthekneetocomparethefemoralrollbackbeforeandaftertotalkneearthroplastytka
AT rottingerheinz patientspecific3dmodelofthekneetocomparethefemoralrollbackbeforeandaftertotalkneearthroplastytka