Cargando…

Kinetic analysis of dominant intraprostatic lesion of prostate cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]DCFPyL-PET: comparison to [(18)F]fluorocholine-PET

PURPOSE: Identification of the dominant intraprostatic lesion(s) (DILs) can facilitate diagnosis and treatment by targeting biologically significant intra-prostatic foci. A PSMA ligand, [(18)F]DCFPyL (2-(3-{1-carboxy-5-[(6-[(18)F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Dae-Myoung, Li, Fiona, Bauman, Glenn, Chin, Joseph, Pautler, Stephen, Moussa, Madeleine, Rachinsky, Irina, Valliant, John, Lee, Ting-Yim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33394284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00735-w
_version_ 1783631943149027328
author Yang, Dae-Myoung
Li, Fiona
Bauman, Glenn
Chin, Joseph
Pautler, Stephen
Moussa, Madeleine
Rachinsky, Irina
Valliant, John
Lee, Ting-Yim
author_facet Yang, Dae-Myoung
Li, Fiona
Bauman, Glenn
Chin, Joseph
Pautler, Stephen
Moussa, Madeleine
Rachinsky, Irina
Valliant, John
Lee, Ting-Yim
author_sort Yang, Dae-Myoung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Identification of the dominant intraprostatic lesion(s) (DILs) can facilitate diagnosis and treatment by targeting biologically significant intra-prostatic foci. A PSMA ligand, [(18)F]DCFPyL (2-(3-{1-carboxy-5-[(6-[(18)F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid), is better than choline-based [(18)F]FCH (fluorocholine) in detecting and localizing DIL because of higher tumour contrast, particularly when imaging is delayed to 1 h post-injection. The goal of this study was to investigate whether the different imaging performance of [(18)F]FCH and [(18)F]DCFPyL can be explained by their kinetic behaviour in prostate cancer (PCa) and to evaluate whether DIL can be accurately detected and localized using a short duration dynamic positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS: 19 and 23 PCa patients were evaluated with dynamic [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(18)F]FCH PET, respectively. The dynamic imaging protocol with each tracer had a total imaging time of 22 min and consisted of multiple frames with acquisition times from 10 to 180 s. Tumour and benign tissue regions identified by sextant biopsy were compared using standardized uptake value (SUV) and tracer kinetic parameters from kinetic analysis of time-activity curves. RESULTS: For [(18)F]DCFPyL, logistic regression identified K(i) and k(4) as the optimal model to discriminate tumour from benign tissue (84.2% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity), while only SUV was predictive for [(18)F]FCH (82.6% sensitivity and 87.0% specificity). The higher k(3) (binding) of [(18)F]FCH than [(18)F]DCFPyL explains why [(18)F]FCH SUV can differentiate tumour from benign tissue within minutes of injection. Superior [(18)F]DCFPyL tumour contrast was due to the higher k(4)/k(3) (more rapid washout) in benign tissue compared to tumour tissue. CONCLUSIONS: DIL was detected with good sensitivity and specificity using 22-min dynamic [(18)F]DCFPyL PET and avoids the need for delayed post-injection imaging timepoints. The dissimilar in vivo kinetic behaviour of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(18)F]FCH could explain their different SUV images. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04009174 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7782622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77826222021-01-14 Kinetic analysis of dominant intraprostatic lesion of prostate cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]DCFPyL-PET: comparison to [(18)F]fluorocholine-PET Yang, Dae-Myoung Li, Fiona Bauman, Glenn Chin, Joseph Pautler, Stephen Moussa, Madeleine Rachinsky, Irina Valliant, John Lee, Ting-Yim EJNMMI Res Original Research PURPOSE: Identification of the dominant intraprostatic lesion(s) (DILs) can facilitate diagnosis and treatment by targeting biologically significant intra-prostatic foci. A PSMA ligand, [(18)F]DCFPyL (2-(3-{1-carboxy-5-[(6-[(18)F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid), is better than choline-based [(18)F]FCH (fluorocholine) in detecting and localizing DIL because of higher tumour contrast, particularly when imaging is delayed to 1 h post-injection. The goal of this study was to investigate whether the different imaging performance of [(18)F]FCH and [(18)F]DCFPyL can be explained by their kinetic behaviour in prostate cancer (PCa) and to evaluate whether DIL can be accurately detected and localized using a short duration dynamic positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS: 19 and 23 PCa patients were evaluated with dynamic [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(18)F]FCH PET, respectively. The dynamic imaging protocol with each tracer had a total imaging time of 22 min and consisted of multiple frames with acquisition times from 10 to 180 s. Tumour and benign tissue regions identified by sextant biopsy were compared using standardized uptake value (SUV) and tracer kinetic parameters from kinetic analysis of time-activity curves. RESULTS: For [(18)F]DCFPyL, logistic regression identified K(i) and k(4) as the optimal model to discriminate tumour from benign tissue (84.2% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity), while only SUV was predictive for [(18)F]FCH (82.6% sensitivity and 87.0% specificity). The higher k(3) (binding) of [(18)F]FCH than [(18)F]DCFPyL explains why [(18)F]FCH SUV can differentiate tumour from benign tissue within minutes of injection. Superior [(18)F]DCFPyL tumour contrast was due to the higher k(4)/k(3) (more rapid washout) in benign tissue compared to tumour tissue. CONCLUSIONS: DIL was detected with good sensitivity and specificity using 22-min dynamic [(18)F]DCFPyL PET and avoids the need for delayed post-injection imaging timepoints. The dissimilar in vivo kinetic behaviour of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(18)F]FCH could explain their different SUV images. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04009174 (ClinicalTrials.gov). Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7782622/ /pubmed/33394284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00735-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yang, Dae-Myoung
Li, Fiona
Bauman, Glenn
Chin, Joseph
Pautler, Stephen
Moussa, Madeleine
Rachinsky, Irina
Valliant, John
Lee, Ting-Yim
Kinetic analysis of dominant intraprostatic lesion of prostate cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]DCFPyL-PET: comparison to [(18)F]fluorocholine-PET
title Kinetic analysis of dominant intraprostatic lesion of prostate cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]DCFPyL-PET: comparison to [(18)F]fluorocholine-PET
title_full Kinetic analysis of dominant intraprostatic lesion of prostate cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]DCFPyL-PET: comparison to [(18)F]fluorocholine-PET
title_fullStr Kinetic analysis of dominant intraprostatic lesion of prostate cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]DCFPyL-PET: comparison to [(18)F]fluorocholine-PET
title_full_unstemmed Kinetic analysis of dominant intraprostatic lesion of prostate cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]DCFPyL-PET: comparison to [(18)F]fluorocholine-PET
title_short Kinetic analysis of dominant intraprostatic lesion of prostate cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]DCFPyL-PET: comparison to [(18)F]fluorocholine-PET
title_sort kinetic analysis of dominant intraprostatic lesion of prostate cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)f]dcfpyl-pet: comparison to [(18)f]fluorocholine-pet
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33394284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00735-w
work_keys_str_mv AT yangdaemyoung kineticanalysisofdominantintraprostaticlesionofprostatecancerusingquantitativedynamic18fdcfpylpetcomparisonto18ffluorocholinepet
AT lifiona kineticanalysisofdominantintraprostaticlesionofprostatecancerusingquantitativedynamic18fdcfpylpetcomparisonto18ffluorocholinepet
AT baumanglenn kineticanalysisofdominantintraprostaticlesionofprostatecancerusingquantitativedynamic18fdcfpylpetcomparisonto18ffluorocholinepet
AT chinjoseph kineticanalysisofdominantintraprostaticlesionofprostatecancerusingquantitativedynamic18fdcfpylpetcomparisonto18ffluorocholinepet
AT pautlerstephen kineticanalysisofdominantintraprostaticlesionofprostatecancerusingquantitativedynamic18fdcfpylpetcomparisonto18ffluorocholinepet
AT moussamadeleine kineticanalysisofdominantintraprostaticlesionofprostatecancerusingquantitativedynamic18fdcfpylpetcomparisonto18ffluorocholinepet
AT rachinskyirina kineticanalysisofdominantintraprostaticlesionofprostatecancerusingquantitativedynamic18fdcfpylpetcomparisonto18ffluorocholinepet
AT valliantjohn kineticanalysisofdominantintraprostaticlesionofprostatecancerusingquantitativedynamic18fdcfpylpetcomparisonto18ffluorocholinepet
AT leetingyim kineticanalysisofdominantintraprostaticlesionofprostatecancerusingquantitativedynamic18fdcfpylpetcomparisonto18ffluorocholinepet