Cargando…

An optimal epidural catheter placement site for post-cesarean section analgesia with double-space technique combined spinal–epidural anesthesia: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Epidural anesthesia affects lower extremities, which often prevents early mobilization postoperatively. The incidence of numbness and motor weakness in the lower extremities with respect to epidural catheter placement site in cesarean section (CS) is uncertain. We aimed to investigate th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murata, Yuya, Yamada, Kumiko, Hamaguchi, Yuto, Yamashita, Soichiro, Tanaka, Makoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33398592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40981-020-00405-9
_version_ 1783631947814141952
author Murata, Yuya
Yamada, Kumiko
Hamaguchi, Yuto
Yamashita, Soichiro
Tanaka, Makoto
author_facet Murata, Yuya
Yamada, Kumiko
Hamaguchi, Yuto
Yamashita, Soichiro
Tanaka, Makoto
author_sort Murata, Yuya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epidural anesthesia affects lower extremities, which often prevents early mobilization postoperatively. The incidence of numbness and motor weakness in the lower extremities with respect to epidural catheter placement site in cesarean section (CS) is uncertain. We aimed to investigate the effect of catheter placement site on postoperative lower extremities numbness and motor weakness in patients who received combined spinal–epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for CS including analgesic effects and optimal epidural placement site in CS. METHODS: We retrospectively included 205 patients who underwent CS with CSEA at the University of Tsukuba Hospital between April 2018 and March 2020, and assessed numbness and motor weakness in the lower extremities. We also examined whether differences in the intervertebral space of epidural catheter placement and epidural effect on the lower extremities are related to analgesic effects. ANOVA and Mann–Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of numbness and motor weakness were 67 (33%) and 28 (14%), respectively. All patients with motor weakness had numbness. A more caudal placement was associated with increased incidence of affected lower extremities. There was no significant difference in the analgesic effect depending on the catheter placement site. When the lower extremities were affected, the number of additional analgesics increased (p < 0.001). Patient-controlled epidural analgesia was used for fewer days in patients with motor weakness (p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: In CS, epidural catheter placement at T10–11 or T11–12 interspace is expected to reduce effect on the lower extremities and improve quality of postoperative analgesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7782655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77826552021-01-14 An optimal epidural catheter placement site for post-cesarean section analgesia with double-space technique combined spinal–epidural anesthesia: a retrospective study Murata, Yuya Yamada, Kumiko Hamaguchi, Yuto Yamashita, Soichiro Tanaka, Makoto JA Clin Rep Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: Epidural anesthesia affects lower extremities, which often prevents early mobilization postoperatively. The incidence of numbness and motor weakness in the lower extremities with respect to epidural catheter placement site in cesarean section (CS) is uncertain. We aimed to investigate the effect of catheter placement site on postoperative lower extremities numbness and motor weakness in patients who received combined spinal–epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for CS including analgesic effects and optimal epidural placement site in CS. METHODS: We retrospectively included 205 patients who underwent CS with CSEA at the University of Tsukuba Hospital between April 2018 and March 2020, and assessed numbness and motor weakness in the lower extremities. We also examined whether differences in the intervertebral space of epidural catheter placement and epidural effect on the lower extremities are related to analgesic effects. ANOVA and Mann–Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of numbness and motor weakness were 67 (33%) and 28 (14%), respectively. All patients with motor weakness had numbness. A more caudal placement was associated with increased incidence of affected lower extremities. There was no significant difference in the analgesic effect depending on the catheter placement site. When the lower extremities were affected, the number of additional analgesics increased (p < 0.001). Patient-controlled epidural analgesia was used for fewer days in patients with motor weakness (p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: In CS, epidural catheter placement at T10–11 or T11–12 interspace is expected to reduce effect on the lower extremities and improve quality of postoperative analgesia. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7782655/ /pubmed/33398592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40981-020-00405-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Murata, Yuya
Yamada, Kumiko
Hamaguchi, Yuto
Yamashita, Soichiro
Tanaka, Makoto
An optimal epidural catheter placement site for post-cesarean section analgesia with double-space technique combined spinal–epidural anesthesia: a retrospective study
title An optimal epidural catheter placement site for post-cesarean section analgesia with double-space technique combined spinal–epidural anesthesia: a retrospective study
title_full An optimal epidural catheter placement site for post-cesarean section analgesia with double-space technique combined spinal–epidural anesthesia: a retrospective study
title_fullStr An optimal epidural catheter placement site for post-cesarean section analgesia with double-space technique combined spinal–epidural anesthesia: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed An optimal epidural catheter placement site for post-cesarean section analgesia with double-space technique combined spinal–epidural anesthesia: a retrospective study
title_short An optimal epidural catheter placement site for post-cesarean section analgesia with double-space technique combined spinal–epidural anesthesia: a retrospective study
title_sort optimal epidural catheter placement site for post-cesarean section analgesia with double-space technique combined spinal–epidural anesthesia: a retrospective study
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33398592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40981-020-00405-9
work_keys_str_mv AT muratayuya anoptimalepiduralcatheterplacementsiteforpostcesareansectionanalgesiawithdoublespacetechniquecombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaaretrospectivestudy
AT yamadakumiko anoptimalepiduralcatheterplacementsiteforpostcesareansectionanalgesiawithdoublespacetechniquecombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaaretrospectivestudy
AT hamaguchiyuto anoptimalepiduralcatheterplacementsiteforpostcesareansectionanalgesiawithdoublespacetechniquecombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaaretrospectivestudy
AT yamashitasoichiro anoptimalepiduralcatheterplacementsiteforpostcesareansectionanalgesiawithdoublespacetechniquecombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaaretrospectivestudy
AT tanakamakoto anoptimalepiduralcatheterplacementsiteforpostcesareansectionanalgesiawithdoublespacetechniquecombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaaretrospectivestudy
AT muratayuya optimalepiduralcatheterplacementsiteforpostcesareansectionanalgesiawithdoublespacetechniquecombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaaretrospectivestudy
AT yamadakumiko optimalepiduralcatheterplacementsiteforpostcesareansectionanalgesiawithdoublespacetechniquecombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaaretrospectivestudy
AT hamaguchiyuto optimalepiduralcatheterplacementsiteforpostcesareansectionanalgesiawithdoublespacetechniquecombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaaretrospectivestudy
AT yamashitasoichiro optimalepiduralcatheterplacementsiteforpostcesareansectionanalgesiawithdoublespacetechniquecombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaaretrospectivestudy
AT tanakamakoto optimalepiduralcatheterplacementsiteforpostcesareansectionanalgesiawithdoublespacetechniquecombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaaretrospectivestudy