Cargando…

A decade of Ecuador´s efforts to raise its health research output: a bibliometric analysis

Background: Over the past decade, the political movement called ‘Revolución Ciudadana’ implemented a variety of policies and interventions (P&I) in Ecuador to improve higher education and strengthen local research capacity. We refer specifically to the ‘Mandato 14’ and the Higher Education Law (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sisa, Ivan, Abad, Andrea, Espinosa, Isabel, Martinez-Cornejo, Isaac, Burbano-Santos, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1855694
_version_ 1783631949879836672
author Sisa, Ivan
Abad, Andrea
Espinosa, Isabel
Martinez-Cornejo, Isaac
Burbano-Santos, Pablo
author_facet Sisa, Ivan
Abad, Andrea
Espinosa, Isabel
Martinez-Cornejo, Isaac
Burbano-Santos, Pablo
author_sort Sisa, Ivan
collection PubMed
description Background: Over the past decade, the political movement called ‘Revolución Ciudadana’ implemented a variety of policies and interventions (P&I) in Ecuador to improve higher education and strengthen local research capacity. We refer specifically to the ‘Mandato 14’ and the Higher Education Law (LOES, Spanish acronym) launched in 2008 and 2010, respectively. Objective: To assess the impact of these P&I (Mandato 14/LOES) on the production of health sciences-related articles (HSRA), and the relationship of these HSRA with the country’s health priorities. Methods: A Scopus search was performed to retrieve HSRA published from 1999 to 2017. Bivariate analysis was used to assess variation between the period I (1999–2008) and period II (2009–2017). Further, we examined the association between the top 10 causes of mortality and the total HSRA output. Results: The final study sample consisted of 2784 articles. After 2008, Ecuadorian production of HSRA increased steadily from 671 to 2133 publications (p<.001). Overall (1999–2017), the most common study design was cross-sectional (32.3%), the primary research focus was in the clinical-surgical area (49.3%), and the academic institutions were the primary drivers of scientific production during period II (56.9% vs. 29.5%, p<.001). Further, we found a decrease in the production of randomized controlled trials (6.7% vs. 1.8%, p<.001). Only 9% of research production involved the primary causes of mortality, and the proportion has remained unchanged over time (8.2% vs. 9.3%, p>.05). Conclusions: Ecuadorian HSRA output increased significantly after 2008. This larger volume of scientific output could be the result to the Mandato 14/LOES implemented in the last decade. However, a low percentage of HSRA are dedicated to addressing the country’s health priorities. Proper planning, execution and monitoring of national health research agendas would reduce the mismatch between health burden and the HSRA output in Ecuador and other low-and middle-income countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7782667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77826672021-01-14 A decade of Ecuador´s efforts to raise its health research output: a bibliometric analysis Sisa, Ivan Abad, Andrea Espinosa, Isabel Martinez-Cornejo, Isaac Burbano-Santos, Pablo Glob Health Action Original Article Background: Over the past decade, the political movement called ‘Revolución Ciudadana’ implemented a variety of policies and interventions (P&I) in Ecuador to improve higher education and strengthen local research capacity. We refer specifically to the ‘Mandato 14’ and the Higher Education Law (LOES, Spanish acronym) launched in 2008 and 2010, respectively. Objective: To assess the impact of these P&I (Mandato 14/LOES) on the production of health sciences-related articles (HSRA), and the relationship of these HSRA with the country’s health priorities. Methods: A Scopus search was performed to retrieve HSRA published from 1999 to 2017. Bivariate analysis was used to assess variation between the period I (1999–2008) and period II (2009–2017). Further, we examined the association between the top 10 causes of mortality and the total HSRA output. Results: The final study sample consisted of 2784 articles. After 2008, Ecuadorian production of HSRA increased steadily from 671 to 2133 publications (p<.001). Overall (1999–2017), the most common study design was cross-sectional (32.3%), the primary research focus was in the clinical-surgical area (49.3%), and the academic institutions were the primary drivers of scientific production during period II (56.9% vs. 29.5%, p<.001). Further, we found a decrease in the production of randomized controlled trials (6.7% vs. 1.8%, p<.001). Only 9% of research production involved the primary causes of mortality, and the proportion has remained unchanged over time (8.2% vs. 9.3%, p>.05). Conclusions: Ecuadorian HSRA output increased significantly after 2008. This larger volume of scientific output could be the result to the Mandato 14/LOES implemented in the last decade. However, a low percentage of HSRA are dedicated to addressing the country’s health priorities. Proper planning, execution and monitoring of national health research agendas would reduce the mismatch between health burden and the HSRA output in Ecuador and other low-and middle-income countries. Taylor & Francis 2020-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7782667/ /pubmed/33357085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1855694 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sisa, Ivan
Abad, Andrea
Espinosa, Isabel
Martinez-Cornejo, Isaac
Burbano-Santos, Pablo
A decade of Ecuador´s efforts to raise its health research output: a bibliometric analysis
title A decade of Ecuador´s efforts to raise its health research output: a bibliometric analysis
title_full A decade of Ecuador´s efforts to raise its health research output: a bibliometric analysis
title_fullStr A decade of Ecuador´s efforts to raise its health research output: a bibliometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed A decade of Ecuador´s efforts to raise its health research output: a bibliometric analysis
title_short A decade of Ecuador´s efforts to raise its health research output: a bibliometric analysis
title_sort decade of ecuador´s efforts to raise its health research output: a bibliometric analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7782667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1855694
work_keys_str_mv AT sisaivan adecadeofecuadorseffortstoraiseitshealthresearchoutputabibliometricanalysis
AT abadandrea adecadeofecuadorseffortstoraiseitshealthresearchoutputabibliometricanalysis
AT espinosaisabel adecadeofecuadorseffortstoraiseitshealthresearchoutputabibliometricanalysis
AT martinezcornejoisaac adecadeofecuadorseffortstoraiseitshealthresearchoutputabibliometricanalysis
AT burbanosantospablo adecadeofecuadorseffortstoraiseitshealthresearchoutputabibliometricanalysis
AT sisaivan decadeofecuadorseffortstoraiseitshealthresearchoutputabibliometricanalysis
AT abadandrea decadeofecuadorseffortstoraiseitshealthresearchoutputabibliometricanalysis
AT espinosaisabel decadeofecuadorseffortstoraiseitshealthresearchoutputabibliometricanalysis
AT martinezcornejoisaac decadeofecuadorseffortstoraiseitshealthresearchoutputabibliometricanalysis
AT burbanosantospablo decadeofecuadorseffortstoraiseitshealthresearchoutputabibliometricanalysis