Cargando…

Lean mass and peak bone mineral density

OBJECTIVES: The association between body composition parameters and peak bone mineral density is not well documented. The aim of this study is to assess the relative contributions of lean mass and fat mass on peak bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: The study involved 416 women and 334 men aged bet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Huy G., Pham, Minh TD., Ho-Pham, Lan T., Nguyen, Tuan V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Osteoporosis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33426311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2020.10.001
_version_ 1783632068895309824
author Nguyen, Huy G.
Pham, Minh TD.
Ho-Pham, Lan T.
Nguyen, Tuan V.
author_facet Nguyen, Huy G.
Pham, Minh TD.
Ho-Pham, Lan T.
Nguyen, Tuan V.
author_sort Nguyen, Huy G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The association between body composition parameters and peak bone mineral density is not well documented. The aim of this study is to assess the relative contributions of lean mass and fat mass on peak bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: The study involved 416 women and 334 men aged between 20 and 30 years who were participants in the population-based Vietnam Osteoporosis Study. Whole body composition parameters (eg, fat mass and lean mass) and BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The association between lean mass and fat mass and BMD was analyzed by the linear regression model using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). RESULTS: Peak BMD in men was higher than women, and the difference was more pronounced at the femoral neck (average difference: 0.123 g/cm(2); 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.105–0.141 g/cm(2)) than at the lumbar spine (average difference 0.019 g/cm(2); 95% CI, 0.005–0.036 g/cm(2)). Results of LASSO regression indicated that lean mass was the only predictor of BMD for either men or women. Each kilogram increase in lean mass was associated with ∼0.01 g/cm(2) increase in BMD. Lean mass alone explained 16% and 36% of variation in lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lean mass, not fat mass, is the main determinant of peak bone mineral density. This finding implies that good physical activity during adulthood can contribute to the maximization of peak bone mass during adulthood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7783218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Osteoporosis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77832182021-01-08 Lean mass and peak bone mineral density Nguyen, Huy G. Pham, Minh TD. Ho-Pham, Lan T. Nguyen, Tuan V. Osteoporos Sarcopenia Original Article OBJECTIVES: The association between body composition parameters and peak bone mineral density is not well documented. The aim of this study is to assess the relative contributions of lean mass and fat mass on peak bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: The study involved 416 women and 334 men aged between 20 and 30 years who were participants in the population-based Vietnam Osteoporosis Study. Whole body composition parameters (eg, fat mass and lean mass) and BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The association between lean mass and fat mass and BMD was analyzed by the linear regression model using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). RESULTS: Peak BMD in men was higher than women, and the difference was more pronounced at the femoral neck (average difference: 0.123 g/cm(2); 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.105–0.141 g/cm(2)) than at the lumbar spine (average difference 0.019 g/cm(2); 95% CI, 0.005–0.036 g/cm(2)). Results of LASSO regression indicated that lean mass was the only predictor of BMD for either men or women. Each kilogram increase in lean mass was associated with ∼0.01 g/cm(2) increase in BMD. Lean mass alone explained 16% and 36% of variation in lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lean mass, not fat mass, is the main determinant of peak bone mineral density. This finding implies that good physical activity during adulthood can contribute to the maximization of peak bone mass during adulthood. Korean Society of Osteoporosis 2020-12 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7783218/ /pubmed/33426311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2020.10.001 Text en © 2020 The Korean Society of Osteoporosis. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Nguyen, Huy G.
Pham, Minh TD.
Ho-Pham, Lan T.
Nguyen, Tuan V.
Lean mass and peak bone mineral density
title Lean mass and peak bone mineral density
title_full Lean mass and peak bone mineral density
title_fullStr Lean mass and peak bone mineral density
title_full_unstemmed Lean mass and peak bone mineral density
title_short Lean mass and peak bone mineral density
title_sort lean mass and peak bone mineral density
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33426311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2020.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenhuyg leanmassandpeakbonemineraldensity
AT phamminhtd leanmassandpeakbonemineraldensity
AT hophamlant leanmassandpeakbonemineraldensity
AT nguyentuanv leanmassandpeakbonemineraldensity