Cargando…

DentalVibe® versus lignocaine hydrochloride 2% gel in pain reduction during inferior alveolar nerve block in children

BACKGROUND: Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is the most common, painful, and anxiety-provoking procedure involving needle insertion for anesthetic solution deposition. DentalVibe® (DV) delivers vibration at a sustained frequency as a counter-stimulation to the site of injection, thereby allevia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menni, Alekhya Chowdary, Radhakrishna, Ambati Naga, Prasad, M. Ghanashyam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409368
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.6.397
_version_ 1783632099464445952
author Menni, Alekhya Chowdary
Radhakrishna, Ambati Naga
Prasad, M. Ghanashyam
author_facet Menni, Alekhya Chowdary
Radhakrishna, Ambati Naga
Prasad, M. Ghanashyam
author_sort Menni, Alekhya Chowdary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is the most common, painful, and anxiety-provoking procedure involving needle insertion for anesthetic solution deposition. DentalVibe® (DV) delivers vibration at a sustained frequency as a counter-stimulation to the site of injection, thereby alleviating pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of DV and lignocaine hydrochloride 2% gel (Lox 2% jelly) in pain reduction during IANB in children. METHODS: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial was designed with a sample of 60 children (age, 6 to 12 years) requiring bilateral IANB for various dental procedures; DV was used while administering IANB and Lox 2% jelly was used as the topical anesthetic before administering IANB at subsequent appointments. During both appointments, pain perception was measured using the sound, eye, motor (SEM) scale and Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale (WBFPRS); oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and pulse rate were measured using a pulse oximeter before, during, and after the IANB procedure. The obtained values were tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis. Wilcoxon test was used for intergroup comparison, and Friedman test, for intragroup comparison of measured variables at different treatment phases. RESULTS: The medians and interquartile ranges of the WBFPRS scores recorded during the IANB procedure for DV and Lox 2% jelly were 2 (2–4) and 2 (0–2), respectively (P < 0.05). The SEM scale scores, mean SpO(2), and pulse rate did not show any significant differences during the IANB procedure between both treatments. CONCLUSION: Both DV and Lox 2% jelly were found to be effective in pain reduction during IANB in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7783374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77833742021-01-05 DentalVibe® versus lignocaine hydrochloride 2% gel in pain reduction during inferior alveolar nerve block in children Menni, Alekhya Chowdary Radhakrishna, Ambati Naga Prasad, M. Ghanashyam J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is the most common, painful, and anxiety-provoking procedure involving needle insertion for anesthetic solution deposition. DentalVibe® (DV) delivers vibration at a sustained frequency as a counter-stimulation to the site of injection, thereby alleviating pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of DV and lignocaine hydrochloride 2% gel (Lox 2% jelly) in pain reduction during IANB in children. METHODS: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial was designed with a sample of 60 children (age, 6 to 12 years) requiring bilateral IANB for various dental procedures; DV was used while administering IANB and Lox 2% jelly was used as the topical anesthetic before administering IANB at subsequent appointments. During both appointments, pain perception was measured using the sound, eye, motor (SEM) scale and Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale (WBFPRS); oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and pulse rate were measured using a pulse oximeter before, during, and after the IANB procedure. The obtained values were tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis. Wilcoxon test was used for intergroup comparison, and Friedman test, for intragroup comparison of measured variables at different treatment phases. RESULTS: The medians and interquartile ranges of the WBFPRS scores recorded during the IANB procedure for DV and Lox 2% jelly were 2 (2–4) and 2 (0–2), respectively (P < 0.05). The SEM scale scores, mean SpO(2), and pulse rate did not show any significant differences during the IANB procedure between both treatments. CONCLUSION: Both DV and Lox 2% jelly were found to be effective in pain reduction during IANB in children. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2020-12 2020-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7783374/ /pubmed/33409368 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.6.397 Text en Copyright © 2020 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Menni, Alekhya Chowdary
Radhakrishna, Ambati Naga
Prasad, M. Ghanashyam
DentalVibe® versus lignocaine hydrochloride 2% gel in pain reduction during inferior alveolar nerve block in children
title DentalVibe® versus lignocaine hydrochloride 2% gel in pain reduction during inferior alveolar nerve block in children
title_full DentalVibe® versus lignocaine hydrochloride 2% gel in pain reduction during inferior alveolar nerve block in children
title_fullStr DentalVibe® versus lignocaine hydrochloride 2% gel in pain reduction during inferior alveolar nerve block in children
title_full_unstemmed DentalVibe® versus lignocaine hydrochloride 2% gel in pain reduction during inferior alveolar nerve block in children
title_short DentalVibe® versus lignocaine hydrochloride 2% gel in pain reduction during inferior alveolar nerve block in children
title_sort dentalvibe® versus lignocaine hydrochloride 2% gel in pain reduction during inferior alveolar nerve block in children
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409368
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.6.397
work_keys_str_mv AT mennialekhyachowdary dentalvibeversuslignocainehydrochloride2gelinpainreductionduringinferioralveolarnerveblockinchildren
AT radhakrishnaambatinaga dentalvibeversuslignocainehydrochloride2gelinpainreductionduringinferioralveolarnerveblockinchildren
AT prasadmghanashyam dentalvibeversuslignocainehydrochloride2gelinpainreductionduringinferioralveolarnerveblockinchildren