Cargando…

Nutritional Interventions in Cancer Cachexia: Evidence and Perspectives From Experimental Models

Cancer cachexia is a complex metabolic syndrome characterized by involuntary skeletal muscle loss and is associated with poor clinical outcome, decreased survival and negatively influences cancer therapy. No curative treatments are available for cancer cachexia, but nutritional intervention is recom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Worp, Wouter R. P. H., Schols, Annemie M. W. J., Theys, Jan, van Helvoort, Ardy, Langen, Ramon C. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33415123
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.601329
_version_ 1783632109748879360
author van de Worp, Wouter R. P. H.
Schols, Annemie M. W. J.
Theys, Jan
van Helvoort, Ardy
Langen, Ramon C. J.
author_facet van de Worp, Wouter R. P. H.
Schols, Annemie M. W. J.
Theys, Jan
van Helvoort, Ardy
Langen, Ramon C. J.
author_sort van de Worp, Wouter R. P. H.
collection PubMed
description Cancer cachexia is a complex metabolic syndrome characterized by involuntary skeletal muscle loss and is associated with poor clinical outcome, decreased survival and negatively influences cancer therapy. No curative treatments are available for cancer cachexia, but nutritional intervention is recommended as a cornerstone of multimodal therapy. Optimal nutritional care is pivotal in the treatment of cancer cachexia, and the effects of nutrients may extend beyond provision of adequate energy uptake, targeting different mechanisms or metabolic pathways that are affected or deregulated by cachexia. The evidence to support this notion derived from nutritional intervention studies in experimental models of cancer cachexia is systematically discussed in this review. Moreover, experimental variables and readout parameters to determine skeletal muscle wasting and cachexia are methodologically evaluated to allow critical comparison of similar studies. Single- and multinutrient intervention studies including qualitative modulation of dietary protein, dietary fat, and supplementation with specific nutrients, such as carnitine and creatine, were reviewed for their efficacy to counteract muscle mass loss and its underlying mechanisms in experimental cancer cachexia. Numerous studies showed favorable effects on impaired protein turnover and related metabolic abnormalities of nutritional supplementation in parallel with a beneficial impact on cancer-induced muscle wasting. The combination of high quality nutrients in a multitargeted, multinutrient approach appears specifically promising, preferentially as a multimodal intervention, although more studies investigating the optimal quantity and combination of nutrients are needed. During the review process, a wide variation in timing, duration, dosing, and route of supplementation, as well as a wide variation in animal models were observed. Better standardization in dietary design, and the development of experimental models that better recapitulate the etiology of human cachexia, will further facilitate successful translation of experimentally-based multinutrient, multimodal interventions into clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7783418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77834182021-01-06 Nutritional Interventions in Cancer Cachexia: Evidence and Perspectives From Experimental Models van de Worp, Wouter R. P. H. Schols, Annemie M. W. J. Theys, Jan van Helvoort, Ardy Langen, Ramon C. J. Front Nutr Nutrition Cancer cachexia is a complex metabolic syndrome characterized by involuntary skeletal muscle loss and is associated with poor clinical outcome, decreased survival and negatively influences cancer therapy. No curative treatments are available for cancer cachexia, but nutritional intervention is recommended as a cornerstone of multimodal therapy. Optimal nutritional care is pivotal in the treatment of cancer cachexia, and the effects of nutrients may extend beyond provision of adequate energy uptake, targeting different mechanisms or metabolic pathways that are affected or deregulated by cachexia. The evidence to support this notion derived from nutritional intervention studies in experimental models of cancer cachexia is systematically discussed in this review. Moreover, experimental variables and readout parameters to determine skeletal muscle wasting and cachexia are methodologically evaluated to allow critical comparison of similar studies. Single- and multinutrient intervention studies including qualitative modulation of dietary protein, dietary fat, and supplementation with specific nutrients, such as carnitine and creatine, were reviewed for their efficacy to counteract muscle mass loss and its underlying mechanisms in experimental cancer cachexia. Numerous studies showed favorable effects on impaired protein turnover and related metabolic abnormalities of nutritional supplementation in parallel with a beneficial impact on cancer-induced muscle wasting. The combination of high quality nutrients in a multitargeted, multinutrient approach appears specifically promising, preferentially as a multimodal intervention, although more studies investigating the optimal quantity and combination of nutrients are needed. During the review process, a wide variation in timing, duration, dosing, and route of supplementation, as well as a wide variation in animal models were observed. Better standardization in dietary design, and the development of experimental models that better recapitulate the etiology of human cachexia, will further facilitate successful translation of experimentally-based multinutrient, multimodal interventions into clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7783418/ /pubmed/33415123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.601329 Text en Copyright © 2020 van de Worp, Schols, Theys, van Helvoort and Langen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
van de Worp, Wouter R. P. H.
Schols, Annemie M. W. J.
Theys, Jan
van Helvoort, Ardy
Langen, Ramon C. J.
Nutritional Interventions in Cancer Cachexia: Evidence and Perspectives From Experimental Models
title Nutritional Interventions in Cancer Cachexia: Evidence and Perspectives From Experimental Models
title_full Nutritional Interventions in Cancer Cachexia: Evidence and Perspectives From Experimental Models
title_fullStr Nutritional Interventions in Cancer Cachexia: Evidence and Perspectives From Experimental Models
title_full_unstemmed Nutritional Interventions in Cancer Cachexia: Evidence and Perspectives From Experimental Models
title_short Nutritional Interventions in Cancer Cachexia: Evidence and Perspectives From Experimental Models
title_sort nutritional interventions in cancer cachexia: evidence and perspectives from experimental models
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33415123
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.601329
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeworpwouterrph nutritionalinterventionsincancercachexiaevidenceandperspectivesfromexperimentalmodels
AT scholsannemiemwj nutritionalinterventionsincancercachexiaevidenceandperspectivesfromexperimentalmodels
AT theysjan nutritionalinterventionsincancercachexiaevidenceandperspectivesfromexperimentalmodels
AT vanhelvoortardy nutritionalinterventionsincancercachexiaevidenceandperspectivesfromexperimentalmodels
AT langenramoncj nutritionalinterventionsincancercachexiaevidenceandperspectivesfromexperimentalmodels