Cargando…
Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of amblyopia screening at ages 3–4. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: From a population with no previous screening, a cohort of 2300 children with 3–4 years old attending school (91% of children this age attend school in Portugal), were submitted to a complete ophthalmologi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000599 |
_version_ | 1783632133309333504 |
---|---|
author | Guimaraes, Sandra Soares, Andreia Freitas, Cristina Barros, Pedro Leite, Ricardo Dourado Costa, Patrício Soares Silva, Eduardo D |
author_facet | Guimaraes, Sandra Soares, Andreia Freitas, Cristina Barros, Pedro Leite, Ricardo Dourado Costa, Patrício Soares Silva, Eduardo D |
author_sort | Guimaraes, Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of amblyopia screening at ages 3–4. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: From a population with no previous screening, a cohort of 2300 children with 3–4 years old attending school (91% of children this age attend school in Portugal), were submitted to a complete ophthalmological evaluation. Amblyopia was diagnosed, treated and followed. Amblyopia prevalence, treatment effectiveness, absolute risk reduction (ARR), number needed to screen (NNS) and relative risk reduction (RRR) were estimated. RESULTS: Past/present history of amblyopia was higher than 3.1%–4.2%, depending on amblyopia definition normatives. Screening at age 3–4, had estimated ARR=2.09% (95% CI 1.50% to 2.68%) with a reduced risk of amblyopia in adulthood of 87% (RRR). NNS was 47.8 (95% CI 37.3 to 66.7). Treatment effectiveness of new diagnosis was 88% (83% if we include children already followed). 91% of new amblyopia diagnoses were refractive (of which 100% surpassed amblyopia Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study criteria after treatment), while most strabismic amblyopias were already treated or undertreatment. Only 30% of children with refractive amblyopia risk factors that were not followed by an ophthalmologist, ended up having amblyopia at age 3–4. Eye patch was needed equally in new-diagnosis versus treated-earlier refractive amblyopia. CONCLUSIONS: Screening amblyopia in a whole-population setting at age 3–4 is highly effective. For each 48 children screened at age 3–4, one amblyopia is estimated to be prevented in the future (NNS). Screening earlier may lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatments: Treating all new diagnosis before age 3–4 would have a maximal difference in ARR of 0.3%, with the possible burden of as much as 70% children being unnecessary treated before age 3–4. Involving primary care, with policies for timely referral of suspicious/high-risk preverbal children, plus whole screening at age 3–4 seems a rational/effective way of controlling amblyopia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7783520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77835202021-01-11 Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study Guimaraes, Sandra Soares, Andreia Freitas, Cristina Barros, Pedro Leite, Ricardo Dourado Costa, Patrício Soares Silva, Eduardo D BMJ Open Ophthalmol Paediatric Ophthalmology OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of amblyopia screening at ages 3–4. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: From a population with no previous screening, a cohort of 2300 children with 3–4 years old attending school (91% of children this age attend school in Portugal), were submitted to a complete ophthalmological evaluation. Amblyopia was diagnosed, treated and followed. Amblyopia prevalence, treatment effectiveness, absolute risk reduction (ARR), number needed to screen (NNS) and relative risk reduction (RRR) were estimated. RESULTS: Past/present history of amblyopia was higher than 3.1%–4.2%, depending on amblyopia definition normatives. Screening at age 3–4, had estimated ARR=2.09% (95% CI 1.50% to 2.68%) with a reduced risk of amblyopia in adulthood of 87% (RRR). NNS was 47.8 (95% CI 37.3 to 66.7). Treatment effectiveness of new diagnosis was 88% (83% if we include children already followed). 91% of new amblyopia diagnoses were refractive (of which 100% surpassed amblyopia Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study criteria after treatment), while most strabismic amblyopias were already treated or undertreatment. Only 30% of children with refractive amblyopia risk factors that were not followed by an ophthalmologist, ended up having amblyopia at age 3–4. Eye patch was needed equally in new-diagnosis versus treated-earlier refractive amblyopia. CONCLUSIONS: Screening amblyopia in a whole-population setting at age 3–4 is highly effective. For each 48 children screened at age 3–4, one amblyopia is estimated to be prevented in the future (NNS). Screening earlier may lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatments: Treating all new diagnosis before age 3–4 would have a maximal difference in ARR of 0.3%, with the possible burden of as much as 70% children being unnecessary treated before age 3–4. Involving primary care, with policies for timely referral of suspicious/high-risk preverbal children, plus whole screening at age 3–4 seems a rational/effective way of controlling amblyopia. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7783520/ /pubmed/33437872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000599 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Paediatric Ophthalmology Guimaraes, Sandra Soares, Andreia Freitas, Cristina Barros, Pedro Leite, Ricardo Dourado Costa, Patrício Soares Silva, Eduardo D Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study |
title | Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study |
title_full | Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study |
title_fullStr | Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study |
title_short | Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study |
title_sort | amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study |
topic | Paediatric Ophthalmology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000599 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guimaraessandra amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy AT soaresandreia amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy AT freitascristina amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy AT barrospedro amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy AT leitericardodourado amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy AT costapatriciosoares amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy AT silvaeduardod amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy |